|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:16 am
nathan_ngl tsshark one of my rabbis told us, that you can touch a girl only when you need to defance yourself (if she's going to kill - eh,slap you or something) or when it's a formal matter, like if she's an important woman, and it wouldn't be nice if you want shake her hand ( and only if she gives you her hand, you must not give her yours). and again, just formal touch. a little handshake, no more. And to try to make skin contact as brief as possible 3nodding . If you can get by with a nod of your head, even better 3nodding . ahh... yep. all the girls here, here some nods: 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 8:01 am
tsshark nathan_ngl tsshark one of my rabbis told us, that you can touch a girl only when you need to defance yourself (if she's going to kill - eh,slap you or something) or when it's a formal matter, like if she's an important woman, and it wouldn't be nice if you want shake her hand ( and only if she gives you her hand, you must not give her yours). and again, just formal touch. a little handshake, no more. And to try to make skin contact as brief as possible 3nodding . If you can get by with a nod of your head, even better 3nodding . ahh... yep. all the girls here, here some nods: 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding xd Thanks, I think? blaugh
|
 |
 |
|
|
darkphoenix1247 Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 3:02 pm
darkphoenix1247 tsshark nathan_ngl tsshark one of my rabbis told us, that you can touch a girl only when you need to defance yourself (if she's going to kill - eh,slap you or something) or when it's a formal matter, like if she's an important woman, and it wouldn't be nice if you want shake her hand ( and only if she gives you her hand, you must not give her yours). and again, just formal touch. a little handshake, no more. And to try to make skin contact as brief as possible 3nodding . If you can get by with a nod of your head, even better 3nodding . ahh... yep. all the girls here, here some nods: 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding xd Thanks, I think? blaugh don't think, just nod!!! 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:53 pm
tsshark darkphoenix1247 tsshark ahh... yep. all the girls here, here some nods: 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding xd Thanks, I think? blaugh don't think, just nod!!! 3nodding 3nodding Do not question the nods! :: thinks :: Why am I nodding? ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
darkphoenix1247 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:15 am
nathan_ngl tsshark darkphoenix1247 tsshark ahh... yep. all the girls here, here some nods: 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding 3nodding xd Thanks, I think? blaugh don't think, just nod!!! 3nodding 3nodding Do not question the nods! :: thinks :: Why am I nodding? ninja xp But what if you nod so imperceptibly that you don't notice? blaugh Ahem, trying to get back towards discussion, a question: what kind of touch is deemed intimate or not? Also, what does Judaism say about girls hugging their female friends if none are lesbian? xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:02 am
I'm reasonably sure girls can hug and stuff like that. I see grown women doing it at shul and I go to a pretty right-wing, hats over sheitels, black stockings on the women and black hats on the men, seperate staircases into the kiddush area in the basement for heaven's sakes shul. ^^;;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:28 pm
darkphoenix1247 what kind of touch is deemed intimate or not? not sure Quote: Also, what does Judaism say about girls hugging their female friends if none are lesbian? xp um. nothing. it's not even a question. and "orientation" has no bearing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 5:30 pm
darkphoenix1247 Ahem, trying to get back towards discussion, a question: what kind of touch is deemed intimate or not? Also, what does Judaism say about girls hugging their female friends if none are lesbian? xp I deeply appoligize if this is too blunt, but here are the facts: Important to remember - Toutch is HOLY. It is the most powerfull sense we have, however little people actually realise it. the reason for these deep restrictions is because when someone reachest the hight of intimacy with his/her spouse, they do NOT want the image of another person blamming into their mind. And no matter how hard you try, the image of that person will be there. The toutch leaves a mark in your brain. Two people from the opposite sex, that are not married should refrain from toutching eachother (at max, bare skin). Intimate toutching would be toutching body parts that are normally covered (this would include upper arms and legs, stomache, back, etc.). This type of toutching should DEFINATELY be reserved between a man and his wife. The ultimate intimacy* (more than toutching) is so great, that it should be done in complete darkness. Anything before that (toutching, hugging, etc.) can be done in light, whereas the final act should be in darkness. Toutch between two people from the same sex is fine, as long as it doesn't reach a point where parts that are usually covered come in contact. * Ultimate intimacy - sex. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:45 am
nathan_ngl darkphoenix1247 Ahem, trying to get back towards discussion, a question: what kind of touch is deemed intimate or not? Also, what does Judaism say about girls hugging their female friends if none are lesbian? xp I deeply appoligize if this is too blunt, but here are the facts: Important to remember - Toutch is HOLY. It is the most powerfull sense we have, however little people actually realise it. the reason for these deep restrictions is because when someone reachest the hight of intimacy with his/her spouse, they do NOT want the image of another person blamming into their mind. And no matter how hard you try, the image of that person will be there. The toutch leaves a mark in your brain. Two people from the opposite sex, that are not married should refrain from toutching eachother (at max, bare skin). Intimate toutching would be toutching body parts that are normally covered (this would include upper arms and legs, stomache, back, etc.). This type of toutching should DEFINATELY be reserved between a man and his wife. The ultimate intimacy* (more than toutching) is so great, that it should be done in complete darkness. Anything before that (toutching, hugging, etc.) can be done in light, whereas the final act should be in darkness. Toutch between two people from the same sex is fine, as long as it doesn't reach a point where parts that are usually covered come in contact. * Ultimate intimacy - sex. sweatdrop how the hell do you know all this stuff? is it because of that book your dad bought for you? well anyhow, i liked that so called speech 3nodding . you should start learn about the art of lecture biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:58 am
nathan_ngl The ultimate intimacy* (more than toutching) is so great, that it should be done in complete darkness. Anything before that (toutching, hugging, etc.) can be done in light, whereas the final act should be in darkness. "darkness" meaning not in direct light. it doesn't mean total, can't-see-my-hand-in-front-of-my-face darkness.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
darkphoenix1247 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:35 am
cool; thank you guys for the help! 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:38 pm
ZonkotheSane nathan_ngl The ultimate intimacy* (more than toutching) is so great, that it should be done in complete darkness. Anything before that (toutching, hugging, etc.) can be done in light, whereas the final act should be in darkness. "darkness" meaning not in direct light. it doesn't mean total, can't-see-my-hand-in-front-of-my-face darkness. Well, as dark as you can get it, I suppose. No candles or lights in the room... If light leaks in through the doors or windows, that honestly does not have to be blocked sweatdrop . The idea is to obscure view, however so slightly...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|