|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:13 pm
l-Kathulu-l I will random kill someone dammit. Or random roll and let that person pick someone to kill. 2 hours THAT'S VIOLENT. VOTE: KATH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:16 pm
"And so ends Day One where we voted to kill our only Admin. The angry mob of players dragged Kathulu out of his house and hung him as the brightest decoration on their town's Christmas Tree. Then without an Admin they all stood around like retarded turkeys, unable to act.
And the one Jewish Family in town gave no ********>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:17 pm
Sweet Amber Lynne im really not sure what the best thing to do is, we've tried the not lynching thing but the mafia has a good chance of getting ahead if we end up lynching a townie but then if we do lynch and we lose a townie were down a man and the mafia gets ahead. Either way it seems its a 50/50 risk i guess now its a matter of if we take the risk or not. It is not a 50/50 risk. We have 100% greater chance to kill a mafia if we vote. (0% to not vote at all. 100%, not 100% garunteed boom headshot dead mafia)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:19 pm
Tonberry Crunch "And so ends Day One where we voted to kill our only Admin. The angry mob of players dragged Kathulu out of his house and hung him as the brightest decoration on their town's Christmas Tree. Then without an Admin they all stood around like retarded turkeys, unable to act.
And the one Jewish Family in town gave no ******** class="clear"> Don't mobs typically have active people in them? HEYO.like they were doing after he explained the roles, anyway
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:27 pm
Same Boat as Ton. I got on to send out the Secret Santa names earlier today, and had blinders on. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:29 pm
Things happen. I almost forgot about it but then remembered. At least the only issue getting in the way is work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:30 pm
I'm feeling that it'd be best to act. But I'm going to wait until 11 or 11:30 to vote so some inactives can cease to exist. (Cease to exist in the sense that they are no longer inactive)
And would look at that, action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:31 pm
Tonberry Crunch I'm feeling that it'd be best to act. But I'm going to wait until 11 or 11:30 to vote so some inactives can cease to exist. (Cease to exist in the sense that they are no longer inactive)
And would look at that, action. Fun Fact: Inactives aren't always mafia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:40 pm
So far Amber and Dessy have roused my suspicions. I'll probably throw a vote on one of them if nothing else happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:41 pm
Cabron LaSwan Dessy seemed really solid in her pinpoint of the town roles, but every mafia role besides the spy ended in a question mark. I don't know if this is legitimate confusion or feigned ignorance, but I thought I'd point it out.
I always feel like not voting on Day 1 is a waste.
Also what Kuzo said, not all inactives are always mafia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:41 pm
Kuzodav Tonberry Crunch I'm feeling that it'd be best to act. But I'm going to wait until 11 or 11:30 to vote so some inactives can cease to exist. (Cease to exist in the sense that they are no longer inactive)
And would look at that, action. Fun Fact: Inactives aren't always mafia. They are, however, always useless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:43 pm
Obviously.
I still want to see how they act. And take time to analyze.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:45 pm
-Dessynea- This. This all over.
I'm making sure I understand the roles/saying the ones I don't.
Good Guys:
Frosty - Role blocker He can stop anyone from moving, because he is a ******** snowman and can do that.
The Not Good Guys:
Easter Rabbit - Dies and mafia loses? He needs to stay alive, or the Good Guys win
The Ice King - Another role blocker? He will FREEZE a d**k because he can. No one will move once he has ******** YOU OVER I dunno, it seems pretty straightforward to me. The two roleblockers' descriptions have the same phrase in them, but only the potentially incriminating one seemed to confuse you. I'm just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:46 pm
Cabron LaSwan Kuzodav Tonberry Crunch I'm feeling that it'd be best to act. But I'm going to wait until 11 or 11:30 to vote so some inactives can cease to exist. (Cease to exist in the sense that they are no longer inactive)
And would look at that, action. Fun Fact: Inactives aren't always mafia. They are, however, always useless. But then if not a threat, a waste of a vote. That's why I'm looking at irregular post patterns instead of just inactives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:47 pm
Kuzodav Cabron LaSwan Kuzodav Tonberry Crunch I'm feeling that it'd be best to act. But I'm going to wait until 11 or 11:30 to vote so some inactives can cease to exist. (Cease to exist in the sense that they are no longer inactive)
And would look at that, action. Fun Fact: Inactives aren't always mafia. They are, however, always useless. But then if not a threat, a waste of a vote. That's why I'm looking at irregular post patterns instead of just inactives. It's day one; I don't think posting patterns are the way to go. I'd rather apply some pressure and see if someone cracks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
