|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:20 pm
i8th Wonder Of The World Yea, but at least we know Vick won't go to Seattle, because its always raining Cats and Dogs. Get it, Cats and Dogs. Eh? I know, bad joke =P. Anyway, how'd we get from talking about Favre to Vick? To answer somebodys question earlier, I think he will stay retired for good this time (At least I hope). VERY VERY VERY annoying story...but we are where we are...lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:24 pm
vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada Itachi-Uchiha-Sama00 Did you get dropped on your head as a baby dude? That aint funny. Nope, just defending Vick from all the PETA bullshit. The way I see it mathematically, 12 dogs = 1 human. Vick killed what, four?Dogs have the IQ equivalant to a 5 year old child. Now what would you think if he had killed a kid? I am not a dog lover by any means, but when you go out and kill something just because you are pissed makes you worse than the lowliest of the low. He does not deserve to be back. He knew what he was doing and I do not believe for one sec that he is sorry for what he did. He is only sorry for getting caught and having his stuff taken away. You know a dog might be as big as a smurf, but I could give two shits if a smurf dies. See and the difference between a five year old and a dog, is that a five year old kids life has meaning. To be quite fair, a dogs does not. I own two dogs and I love them two death, but Vick got these pets from a pound. Regardless they would have been dead. Dante Stallworth killed someone and served twenty-four days, so if thats how "justice is served", Vick served way too much time behind bars.There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Hmm.. Both answers are plausible.... But I'd say it was an accident... Of-course in that guys defense Vick may have accidently electrocuted dogs, accidently tied bricks to the dogs legs and let them swim, also maybe the noos accidently slipped onto the dogs neck and whatever was under him slipped, vick accidently made a rape stand and the female dogs decided under their own will to mount it. But then again, that was all on purpose.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:39 pm
IndianapolisColtsFan vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada Itachi-Uchiha-Sama00 Did you get dropped on your head as a baby dude? That aint funny. Nope, just defending Vick from all the PETA bullshit. The way I see it mathematically, 12 dogs = 1 human. Vick killed what, four?Dogs have the IQ equivalant to a 5 year old child. Now what would you think if he had killed a kid? I am not a dog lover by any means, but when you go out and kill something just because you are pissed makes you worse than the lowliest of the low. He does not deserve to be back. He knew what he was doing and I do not believe for one sec that he is sorry for what he did. He is only sorry for getting caught and having his stuff taken away. You know a dog might be as big as a smurf, but I could give two shits if a smurf dies. See and the difference between a five year old and a dog, is that a five year old kids life has meaning. To be quite fair, a dogs does not. I own two dogs and I love them two death, but Vick got these pets from a pound. Regardless they would have been dead. Dante Stallworth killed someone and served twenty-four days, so if thats how "justice is served", Vick served way too much time behind bars.There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Hmm.. Both answers are plausible.... But I'd say it was an accident... Of-course in that guys defense Vick may have accidently electrocuted dogs, accidently tied bricks to the dogs legs and let them swim, also maybe the noos accidently slipped onto the dogs neck and whatever was under him slipped, vick accidently made a rape stand and the female dogs decided under their own will to mount it. But then again, that was all on purpose. OMFG eek smile biggrin xd blaugh rofl
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:41 pm
Now, the rape stand....actually there are a lot of breeders that use that not just people who are trying to breed fighting dogs...so in his defence animal lovers sometimes use that because they are having a problem getting two dogs to mate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:48 pm
beachbabe_always Now, the rape stand....actually there are a lot of breeders that use that not just people who are trying to breed fighting dogs...so in his defence animal lovers sometimes use that because they are having a problem getting two dogs to mate. That could sound feasable.... though extremely unlikely
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:56 pm
vegito61283 beachbabe_always Now, the rape stand....actually there are a lot of breeders that use that not just people who are trying to breed fighting dogs...so in his defence animal lovers sometimes use that because they are having a problem getting two dogs to mate. That could sound feasable.... though extremely unlikelyWhen two dogs are having trouble reproducing they use all sorts of things to try to help. You would be amazed. Trust me a few of my friends throughout my life breed dogs and my dad's family usto do it as an extra source of income to put food on the table. Not saying that every breeder is all about it but sometimes the physics doesn't work out unless they have help of these crazy things. Not saying that I would use it if I was trainer or that he would need one for breeding dogs but it could be logical to use one. Again I am not really into the whole dog fighting scene but compairing dogs to children is rediculous. You can never put a child down like you could a dog. I am not saying its right the way he used them for entertainment but the compairisons to people is rediculous.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:35 am
vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada Itachi-Uchiha-Sama00 Did you get dropped on your head as a baby dude? That aint funny. Nope, just defending Vick from all the PETA bullshit. The way I see it mathematically, 12 dogs = 1 human. Vick killed what, four?Dogs have the IQ equivalant to a 5 year old child. Now what would you think if he had killed a kid? I am not a dog lover by any means, but when you go out and kill something just because you are pissed makes you worse than the lowliest of the low. He does not deserve to be back. He knew what he was doing and I do not believe for one sec that he is sorry for what he did. He is only sorry for getting caught and having his stuff taken away. You know a dog might be as big as a smurf, but I could give two shits if a smurf dies. See and the difference between a five year old and a dog, is that a five year old kids life has meaning. To be quite fair, a dogs does not. I own two dogs and I love them two death, but Vick got these pets from a pound. Regardless they would have been dead. Dante Stallworth killed someone and served twenty-four days, so if thats how "justice is served", Vick served way too much time behind bars.There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Yeah, he couldn't deny it because he stayed with the guy. All I'm saying is, I'd rather have my kid kill a few puppies than drive drunk over the limit and kill someone.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 5:42 am
TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada Itachi-Uchiha-Sama00 Did you get dropped on your head as a baby dude? That aint funny. Nope, just defending Vick from all the PETA bullshit. The way I see it mathematically, 12 dogs = 1 human. Vick killed what, four?Dogs have the IQ equivalant to a 5 year old child. Now what would you think if he had killed a kid? I am not a dog lover by any means, but when you go out and kill something just because you are pissed makes you worse than the lowliest of the low. He does not deserve to be back. He knew what he was doing and I do not believe for one sec that he is sorry for what he did. He is only sorry for getting caught and having his stuff taken away. You know a dog might be as big as a smurf, but I could give two shits if a smurf dies. See and the difference between a five year old and a dog, is that a five year old kids life has meaning. To be quite fair, a dogs does not. I own two dogs and I love them two death, but Vick got these pets from a pound. Regardless they would have been dead. Dante Stallworth killed someone and served twenty-four days, so if thats how "justice is served", Vick served way too much time behind bars.There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Yeah, he couldn't deny it because he stayed with the guy. All I'm saying is, I'd rather have my kid kill a few puppies than drive drunk over the limit and kill someone.Many people have a much higher tolerance level than the legal limit, In fact some people still act normal at the legal limit, other people maybe throwing up falling down drunk. Stallworth seemed normal, and would have most likely hit and killed the guy if he hadn't been drinking. Vick also personally helped in the killing of about 8 dogs not 4, and it wasn't like he put them down, he electrocuted, drowned, and hung dogs that weren't fighting good enough for him, maybe Atlanta should hold him down and drown him cause he didn't play good enough for us. When somebody kills a police dog they get the punishment that they would for killing a human police officer. The NFL is not a right, it is a privilege and Vick, Stallworth, and others are lucky to still be able to play in the league at all. Oh the dogs that would die anyway in the pound, do you realize how much a puppy American blue female pittbull is worth? around a couple thousand for a good one, so in other words Vick killed him self about 9,600 dollars worth of living breathing animals. Well this has gone on way to long, thanks to Someone who clearly doesn't know English, let's get back to a QB who is actually worth the time, Brett Favre.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:00 am
Oreion TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 Dogs have the IQ equivalant to a 5 year old child. Now what would you think if he had killed a kid? I am not a dog lover by any means, but when you go out and kill something just because you are pissed makes you worse than the lowliest of the low. He does not deserve to be back. He knew what he was doing and I do not believe for one sec that he is sorry for what he did. He is only sorry for getting caught and having his stuff taken away. You know a dog might be as big as a smurf, but I could give two shits if a smurf dies. See and the difference between a five year old and a dog, is that a five year old kids life has meaning. To be quite fair, a dogs does not. I own two dogs and I love them two death, but Vick got these pets from a pound. Regardless they would have been dead. Dante Stallworth killed someone and served twenty-four days, so if thats how "justice is served", Vick served way too much time behind bars.There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Yeah, he couldn't deny it because he stayed with the guy. All I'm saying is, I'd rather have my kid kill a few puppies than drive drunk over the limit and kill someone.Many people have a much higher tolerance level than the legal limit, In fact some people still act normal at the legal limit, other people maybe throwing up falling down drunk. Stallworth seemed normal, and would have most likely hit and killed the guy if he hadn't been drinking. Vick also personally helped in the killing of about 8 dogs not 4, and it wasn't like he put them down, he electrocuted, drowned, and hung dogs that weren't fighting good enough for him, maybe Atlanta should hold him down and drown him cause he didn't play good enough for us. When somebody kills a police dog they get the punishment that they would for killing a human police officer. The NFL is not a right, it is a privilege and Vick, Stallworth, and others are lucky to still be able to play in the league at all. Oh the dogs that would die anyway in the pound, do you realize how much a puppy American blue female pittbull is worth? around a couple thousand for a good one, so in other words Vick killed him self about 9,600 dollars worth of living breathing animals. Well this has gone on way to long, thanks to Someone who clearly doesn't know English, let's get back to a QB who is actually worth the time, Brett Favre. Being able to walk and talk normally shouldn't mean that you should be driving a car. Just cause you don't show signs of being intoxicated doesn't mean it doesn't effect your reaction time, your ability to observe things excetra. And weither or not you think he is a good player or not is a seperate issue then weither or not you think he is a good guy. People make bad decisions and if you can accept that players like Chad Johnson beats women, or things of that nature then you need to see past the dog fighting thing the same way. I think higher of a man who would have a dog fighting ring then a man that drives drunk on a regular basis or a guy that beats the crap out of and rapes women on a regular basis. Not saying that dogs lives don't matter but again, dogs can be put down, people even if they want you to can't. Assisted suicide is only legal I think in one state in the us but putting down sick dogs is legal I think in all of them. Not saying that putting a sick dog down is equal to killing one but its all relative. And just because you don't like a QB doesn't mean he is nessiarily not work time to talk about. I have to say after Farve's stunt I would debate wheither he is worth time to talk about. He was known as the QB that just loved the game but to do what he did there was no love of the game there, there was love of the fame, the control, and self indulgence.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:10 am
beachbabe_always Oreion TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 Dogs have the IQ equivalant to a 5 year old child. Now what would you think if he had killed a kid? I am not a dog lover by any means, but when you go out and kill something just because you are pissed makes you worse than the lowliest of the low. He does not deserve to be back. He knew what he was doing and I do not believe for one sec that he is sorry for what he did. He is only sorry for getting caught and having his stuff taken away. You know a dog might be as big as a smurf, but I could give two shits if a smurf dies. See and the difference between a five year old and a dog, is that a five year old kids life has meaning. To be quite fair, a dogs does not. I own two dogs and I love them two death, but Vick got these pets from a pound. Regardless they would have been dead. Dante Stallworth killed someone and served twenty-four days, so if thats how "justice is served", Vick served way too much time behind bars.There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Yeah, he couldn't deny it because he stayed with the guy. All I'm saying is, I'd rather have my kid kill a few puppies than drive drunk over the limit and kill someone.Many people have a much higher tolerance level than the legal limit, In fact some people still act normal at the legal limit, other people maybe throwing up falling down drunk. Stallworth seemed normal, and would have most likely hit and killed the guy if he hadn't been drinking. Vick also personally helped in the killing of about 8 dogs not 4, and it wasn't like he put them down, he electrocuted, drowned, and hung dogs that weren't fighting good enough for him, maybe Atlanta should hold him down and drown him cause he didn't play good enough for us. When somebody kills a police dog they get the punishment that they would for killing a human police officer. The NFL is not a right, it is a privilege and Vick, Stallworth, and others are lucky to still be able to play in the league at all. Oh the dogs that would die anyway in the pound, do you realize how much a puppy American blue female pittbull is worth? around a couple thousand for a good one, so in other words Vick killed him self about 9,600 dollars worth of living breathing animals. Well this has gone on way to long, thanks to Someone who clearly doesn't know English, let's get back to a QB who is actually worth the time, Brett Favre. Being able to walk and talk normally shouldn't mean that you should be driving a car. Just cause you don't show signs of being intoxicated doesn't mean it doesn't effect your reaction time, your ability to observe things excetra. And weither or not you think he is a good player or not is a seperate issue then weither or not you think he is a good guy. People make bad decisions and if you can accept that players like Chad Johnson beats women, or things of that nature then you need to see past the dog fighting thing the same way. I think higher of a man who would have a dog fighting ring then a man that drives drunk on a regular basis or a guy that beats the crap out of and rapes women on a regular basis. Not saying that dogs lives don't matter but again, dogs can be put down, people even if they want you to can't. Assisted suicide is only legal I think in one state in the us but putting down sick dogs is legal I think in all of them. Not saying that putting a sick dog down is equal to killing one but its all relative. And just because you don't like a QB doesn't mean he is nessiarily not work time to talk about. I have to say after Farve's stunt I would debate wheither he is worth time to talk about. He was known as the QB that just loved the game but to do what he did there was no love of the game there, there was love of the fame, the control, and self indulgence. The Vikings kept this going, Favre told them almost 2 weeks ago that he wasn't going to be able to play, they kept calling him asking him to come back, gave his number to their player so they could ask him to come back because they new their QB's are all garbage, they feed the media with most of their information. Favre was the best QB last year, the year before and every other year he was in the league, Favre was one of a kind, who played hurt, played when family died, didn't matter he went out their and played. Also i didn't condone Johnson, Burress, Stallworth, Vick or anyone else, in my opinion you get one chance then your gone, and it doesn't matter if you are Vick, or Peyton Manning.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:08 am
vegito61283 IndianapolisColtsFan vegito61283 TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 Dogs have the IQ equivalant to a 5 year old child. Now what would you think if he had killed a kid? I am not a dog lover by any means, but when you go out and kill something just because you are pissed makes you worse than the lowliest of the low. He does not deserve to be back. He knew what he was doing and I do not believe for one sec that he is sorry for what he did. He is only sorry for getting caught and having his stuff taken away. You know a dog might be as big as a smurf, but I could give two shits if a smurf dies. See and the difference between a five year old and a dog, is that a five year old kids life has meaning. To be quite fair, a dogs does not. I own two dogs and I love them two death, but Vick got these pets from a pound. Regardless they would have been dead. Dante Stallworth killed someone and served twenty-four days, so if thats how "justice is served", Vick served way too much time behind bars.There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Hmm.. Both answers are plausible.... But I'd say it was an accident... Of-course in that guys defense Vick may have accidently electrocuted dogs, accidently tied bricks to the dogs legs and let them swim, also maybe the noos accidently slipped onto the dogs neck and whatever was under him slipped, vick accidently made a rape stand and the female dogs decided under their own will to mount it. But then again, that was all on purpose. OMFG eek smile biggrin xd blaugh rofl I laugh at this, lol.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:18 pm
Oreion beachbabe_always Oreion TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Yeah, he couldn't deny it because he stayed with the guy. All I'm saying is, I'd rather have my kid kill a few puppies than drive drunk over the limit and kill someone.Many people have a much higher tolerance level than the legal limit, In fact some people still act normal at the legal limit, other people maybe throwing up falling down drunk. Stallworth seemed normal, and would have most likely hit and killed the guy if he hadn't been drinking. Vick also personally helped in the killing of about 8 dogs not 4, and it wasn't like he put them down, he electrocuted, drowned, and hung dogs that weren't fighting good enough for him, maybe Atlanta should hold him down and drown him cause he didn't play good enough for us. When somebody kills a police dog they get the punishment that they would for killing a human police officer. The NFL is not a right, it is a privilege and Vick, Stallworth, and others are lucky to still be able to play in the league at all. Oh the dogs that would die anyway in the pound, do you realize how much a puppy American blue female pittbull is worth? around a couple thousand for a good one, so in other words Vick killed him self about 9,600 dollars worth of living breathing animals. Well this has gone on way to long, thanks to Someone who clearly doesn't know English, let's get back to a QB who is actually worth the time, Brett Favre. Being able to walk and talk normally shouldn't mean that you should be driving a car. Just cause you don't show signs of being intoxicated doesn't mean it doesn't effect your reaction time, your ability to observe things excetra. And weither or not you think he is a good player or not is a seperate issue then weither or not you think he is a good guy. People make bad decisions and if you can accept that players like Chad Johnson beats women, or things of that nature then you need to see past the dog fighting thing the same way. I think higher of a man who would have a dog fighting ring then a man that drives drunk on a regular basis or a guy that beats the crap out of and rapes women on a regular basis. Not saying that dogs lives don't matter but again, dogs can be put down, people even if they want you to can't. Assisted suicide is only legal I think in one state in the us but putting down sick dogs is legal I think in all of them. Not saying that putting a sick dog down is equal to killing one but its all relative. And just because you don't like a QB doesn't mean he is nessiarily not work time to talk about. I have to say after Farve's stunt I would debate wheither he is worth time to talk about. He was known as the QB that just loved the game but to do what he did there was no love of the game there, there was love of the fame, the control, and self indulgence. The Vikings kept this going, Favre told them almost 2 weeks ago that he wasn't going to be able to play, they kept calling him asking him to come back, gave his number to their player so they could ask him to come back because they new their QB's are all garbage, they feed the media with most of their information. Favre was the best QB last year, the year before and every other year he was in the league, Favre was one of a kind, who played hurt, played when family died, didn't matter he went out their and played. Also i didn't condone Johnson, Burress, Stallworth, Vick or anyone else, in my opinion you get one chance then your gone, and it doesn't matter if you are Vick, or Peyton Manning. Are you high!? The only reason people thought Brett Favre last year was good is because he's living by his name, just like Charles Woodson. The best QB last year? The guy threw as many interceptions as he did touchdowns. He didn't even lead his team to the playoffs when they were (9-3) and threw for only 3000 yards or so. But you know what? Let's forget people who did better like Jason Campbell, Kurt Warner, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, Donovan McNabb, Jay Cutler, Aaron Rodgers, Matt Cassell, Peyton Manning, Ben Roethlisberger, Joe Flacco, Matt Ryan, Jake Delhomme, Chad Pennington, Phillip Rivers... anyone else I'm missing?
Sure, he was one of a kind with his just-keep-going attitude. But if Ryan Leaf or Joey Harrington had done the same, would they be the best? I think Brett Favre is an over-dramatic little fairyboy who is far past his prime and who needs to leave the media alone like the attention whore he is. There are 32 other quarterbacks out there who deserve to start, and they don't need a guy on a walker coming in and taking their spot simply because of his first and last name.
Oh yeah, I can speak English. Remember to capitalize your I's when you speak in first person. (:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:15 pm
TBC x CptCanada Oreion beachbabe_always Oreion TBC x CptCanada vegito61283 There is a difference from the Stallworth and Vick situations. Stallworth had not intent and it was dark with the guy wearing dark clothes along with running into the street not giving him time to stop. The guy did it about 30ft from the crosswalk. The one cop who was sitting a few intersections down where Dante was came from said he didnt even see anything wrong with Stallworth when he passed. Was not even speeding or using a cell phone. Now out of your remark about the justice of the situation, Vick served only 2 years for killing "defensless animals" and then denied it all the way till he had no choice. Stallworth did not deny a single thing and even went and pleaded guilty against the better judgment of his lawyer. Answer me this though. If you were going down a dark street and all of a sudden a guy wearing dark clothing came running across the street less than around 10 feet and you hit him, what would you think? Would you have accepted the accusation that you murdered him or would you say it was nothing but an unfortunate accident? Yeah, he couldn't deny it because he stayed with the guy. All I'm saying is, I'd rather have my kid kill a few puppies than drive drunk over the limit and kill someone.Many people have a much higher tolerance level than the legal limit, In fact some people still act normal at the legal limit, other people maybe throwing up falling down drunk. Stallworth seemed normal, and would have most likely hit and killed the guy if he hadn't been drinking. Vick also personally helped in the killing of about 8 dogs not 4, and it wasn't like he put them down, he electrocuted, drowned, and hung dogs that weren't fighting good enough for him, maybe Atlanta should hold him down and drown him cause he didn't play good enough for us. When somebody kills a police dog they get the punishment that they would for killing a human police officer. The NFL is not a right, it is a privilege and Vick, Stallworth, and others are lucky to still be able to play in the league at all. Oh the dogs that would die anyway in the pound, do you realize how much a puppy American blue female pittbull is worth? around a couple thousand for a good one, so in other words Vick killed him self about 9,600 dollars worth of living breathing animals. Well this has gone on way to long, thanks to Someone who clearly doesn't know English, let's get back to a QB who is actually worth the time, Brett Favre. Being able to walk and talk normally shouldn't mean that you should be driving a car. Just cause you don't show signs of being intoxicated doesn't mean it doesn't effect your reaction time, your ability to observe things excetra. And weither or not you think he is a good player or not is a seperate issue then weither or not you think he is a good guy. People make bad decisions and if you can accept that players like Chad Johnson beats women, or things of that nature then you need to see past the dog fighting thing the same way. I think higher of a man who would have a dog fighting ring then a man that drives drunk on a regular basis or a guy that beats the crap out of and rapes women on a regular basis. Not saying that dogs lives don't matter but again, dogs can be put down, people even if they want you to can't. Assisted suicide is only legal I think in one state in the us but putting down sick dogs is legal I think in all of them. Not saying that putting a sick dog down is equal to killing one but its all relative. And just because you don't like a QB doesn't mean he is nessiarily not work time to talk about. I have to say after Farve's stunt I would debate wheither he is worth time to talk about. He was known as the QB that just loved the game but to do what he did there was no love of the game there, there was love of the fame, the control, and self indulgence. The Vikings kept this going, Favre told them almost 2 weeks ago that he wasn't going to be able to play, they kept calling him asking him to come back, gave his number to their player so they could ask him to come back because they new their QB's are all garbage, they feed the media with most of their information. Favre was the best QB last year, the year before and every other year he was in the league, Favre was one of a kind, who played hurt, played when family died, didn't matter he went out their and played. Also i didn't condone Johnson, Burress, Stallworth, Vick or anyone else, in my opinion you get one chance then your gone, and it doesn't matter if you are Vick, or Peyton Manning. Are you high!? The only reason people thought Brett Favre last year was good is because he's living by his name, just like Charles Woodson. The best QB last year? The guy threw as many interceptions as he did touchdowns. He didn't even lead his team to the playoffs when they were (9-3) and threw for only 3000 yards or so. But you know what? Let's forget people who did better like Jason Campbell, Kurt Warner, Tony Romo, Eli Manning, Donovan McNabb, Jay Cutler, Aaron Rodgers, Matt Cassell, Peyton Manning, Ben Roethlisberger, Joe Flacco, Matt Ryan, Jake Delhomme, Chad Pennington, Phillip Rivers... anyone else I'm missing?
Sure, he was one of a kind with his just-keep-going attitude. But if Ryan Leaf or Joey Harrington had done the same, would they be the best? I think Brett Favre is an over-dramatic little fairyboy who is far past his prime and who needs to leave the media alone like the attention whore he is. There are 32 other quarterbacks out there who deserve to start, and they don't need a guy on a walker coming in and taking their spot simply because of his first and last name.
Oh yeah, I can speak English. Remember to capitalize your I's when you speak in first person. (:Well I wasn't talking to you about that now was I, I was talking about the guy that got us off Favre and on Vick. Favre last year looked good, until he tore a muscle in his arm, lest see you go out and throw the ball up and down the field with a partial tear in your arm. Favre said 2 weeks ago that he was done, the media and the Vikings kept it going. Do you want to know why Favre is so talked about? because he is a legend. Favre is better than any Texas QB Meredith, Aikman, Staubach doesn't matter he was better than they were. Whats up with the fairy boy? Favre has more heart, determination, and was tougher than anybody else.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 4:41 pm
Yeah, I guess you're right about Staubach and Aikman. After all, didn't they go to eight superbowls combined? Thats just awful.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:18 am
TBC x CptCanada Yeah, I guess you're right about Staubach and Aikman. After all, didn't they go to eight superbowls combined? Thats just awful. You forgot Meredith too, and yes Favre is better than them. They may have been on a better team, so it's basically the Manning-Brady competition, Manning is better but Brady is on the better team.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|