|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:07 pm
I have a couple mules in here in case something happens to my main account I can get to you guys easier.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:09 pm
Divinus Cruor I have a couple mules in here in case something happens to my main account I can get to you guys easier. well no using them!!! rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:10 pm
In order to prevent use of mules, if the person who breaks the chain is not a normal member that we see posting in here, the chain is still active.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:11 pm
Divinus Cruor I have a couple mules in here in case something happens to my main account I can get to you guys easier. Even after the bannings?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:13 pm
I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently.
I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:19 pm
Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. ok, but since we're doing it so only regular member can break a chain, mules won't matter. If a stab/counterstab chain is started and the person who breaks it is unrecognized by the stabbers, the chain is still active.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:22 pm
Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. ok, but since we're doing it so only regular member can break a chain, mules won't matter. If a stab/counterstab chain is started and the person who breaks it is unrecognized by the stabbers, the chain is still active. shouldnt the ref be in charge of declaring the chain active/inactive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:26 pm
MegaTherion777 Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. ok, but since we're doing it so only regular member can break a chain, mules won't matter. If a stab/counterstab chain is started and the person who breaks it is unrecognized by the stabbers, the chain is still active. shouldnt the ref be in charge of declaring the chain active/inactive? Yes, but these are just ground rules being set to help make it fair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:29 pm
Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. ok, but since we're doing it so only regular member can break a chain, mules won't matter. If a stab/counterstab chain is started and the person who breaks it is unrecognized by the stabbers, the chain is still active. shouldnt the ref be in charge of declaring the chain active/inactive? Yes, but these are just ground rules being set to help make it fair. well let's just say that if they don't recognize the interrupter, PM me the link and i will review it and make a post declaring whether their chain is still active or not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:31 pm
MegaTherion777 Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. ok, but since we're doing it so only regular member can break a chain, mules won't matter. If a stab/counterstab chain is started and the person who breaks it is unrecognized by the stabbers, the chain is still active. shouldnt the ref be in charge of declaring the chain active/inactive? Yes, but these are just ground rules being set to help make it fair. well let's just say that if they don't recognize the interrupter, PM me the link and i will review it and make a post declaring whether their chain is still active or not sounds good, but if they stab after the post and before your ruling, they are disqualified (unless it's posted at the same time).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:32 pm
Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Gravechylde MegaTherion777 Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. ok, but since we're doing it so only regular member can break a chain, mules won't matter. If a stab/counterstab chain is started and the person who breaks it is unrecognized by the stabbers, the chain is still active. shouldnt the ref be in charge of declaring the chain active/inactive? Yes, but these are just ground rules being set to help make it fair. well let's just say that if they don't recognize the interrupter, PM me the link and i will review it and make a post declaring whether their chain is still active or not sounds good, but if they stab after the post and before your ruling, they are disqualified (unless it's posted at the same time). yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:41 pm
Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. I just looked and neither of those two are in the member list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:57 pm
Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. I just looked and neither of those two are in the member list. You have been banned from Metal Reign by Gravechylde. Gravechylde also provided this reason for this action: You are being banned for inactivity. You are welcome to join back again, but if you don't post you'll end up being banned again. ________________________________________________________________________ Thought you were going to PM them first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:01 pm
Divinus Cruor Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. I just looked and neither of those two are in the member list. You have been banned from Metal Reign by Gravechylde. Gravechylde also provided this reason for this action: You are being banned for inactivity. You are welcome to join back again, but if you don't post you'll end up being banned again. ________________________________________________________________________ Thought you were going to PM them first. PMing all would've taken WAY too long, even just the bannings took a while to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:14 pm
Gravechylde Divinus Cruor Gravechylde Divinus Cruor I think the first mule fell with the bannings. But my other mule is still here. He came recently. I agree with you Grave, and to avoid confusion adn misunderstandings, my mules are Svennson and Ghostly Devotion. I just looked and neither of those two are in the member list. You have been banned from Metal Reign by Gravechylde. Gravechylde also provided this reason for this action: You are being banned for inactivity. You are welcome to join back again, but if you don't post you'll end up being banned again. ________________________________________________________________________ Thought you were going to PM them first. PMing all would've taken WAY too long, even just the bannings took a while to do. but GD was just one month old in the guild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
