|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:36 pm
InfernalPenguin Dark Lord Yawgmoth 1313.EXE -my opponent has a bunch of wizard's in play, i play wrath of god, in response he played pyschic trance.-but in response i "rewind" the trance, then he said he can still tap his wizard's to counter my wrath.? No he can't do that. The wizards don't get the ability "tap: Counter target spell" until the trance has resolved. Since you rewound the trance the wizards never get the ability and then god goes boom. And all the wizards cry whee whee all the way to the graveyard xd unless of course you have a wizard that already has that ability... then you could use the wizard, but then again nobaody uses wizards, and you know why? because wizards suck No wizard has the ability "Tap: Counter target spell" the two closest are Daring Apprentice which says "Tap, Sac: Counter Target Spell" and the mono blue Ertai which says "2UU, Tap: Counter Target Spell"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 6:54 am
Dark Lord Yawgmoth InfernalPenguin Dark Lord Yawgmoth 1313.EXE -my opponent has a bunch of wizard''s in play, i play wrath of god, in response he played pyschic trance.-but in response i "rewind" the trance, then he said he can still tap his wizard''s to counter my wrath.? No he can''t do that. The wizards don''t get the ability "tap: Counter target spell" until the trance has resolved. Since you rewound the trance the wizards never get the ability and then god goes boom. And all the wizards cry whee whee all the way to the graveyard xd unless of course you have a wizard that already has that ability... then you could use the wizard, but then again nobaody uses wizards, and you know why? because wizards suck No wizard has the ability "Tap: Counter target spell" the two closest are Daring Apprentice which says "Tap, Sac: Counter Target Spell" and the mono blue Ertai which says "2UU, Tap: Counter Target Spell" You Forget Disruptive Pitmage Which States "Tap: Counter Target Speel unless its controller pays 1"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:43 am
-((my question is still bein' discuss. sweatdrop ))
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 10:44 am
No I was talking about flat out counter abilities sweatdrop not counter target spell unless sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:43 am
Dark Lord Yawgmoth No I was talking about flat out counter abilities sweatdrop not counter target spell unless sweatdrop I see, I am sorry.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 5:50 am
Wow haven't gotten questions in quite some time sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 8:31 am
i was talking about diruptive pathmage, but i was tired and didnt put the full ability. i figuredyall would get the general idea....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:32 pm
-if my opponent has 3 card's left in his library and i casted traumatize on him, wha' would it be.? 1 card or 2.?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:36 pm
1313.EXE -if my opponent has 3 card's left in his library and i casted traumatize on him, wha' would it be.? 1 card or 2.? Traumatize says "rounded down" half of 3 is 1.5 rounded down is 1. So you paid 5 mana to deck him for one card xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 2:46 pm
Dark Lord Yawgmoth 1313.EXE -if my opponent has 3 card's left in his library and i casted traumatize on him, wha' would it be.? 1 card or 2.? Traumatize says "rounded down" half of 3 is 1.5 rounded down is 1. So you paid 5 mana to deck him for one card xd in other words.....not worth it mrgreen
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:04 pm
Dark Lord Yawgmoth 1313.EXE -if my opponent has 3 card's left in his library and i casted traumatize on him, wha' would it be.? 1 card or 2.? Traumatize says "rounded down" half of 3 is 1.5 rounded down is 1. So you paid 5 mana to deck him for one card xd -no. my friend did that to me, i just played reminisce next turn. lol
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:40 pm
gonk ouch that's a kick in his nuts if there ever was one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Dark Lord Yawgmoth gonk ouch that's a kick in his nuts if there ever was one. -wha's that supposed to mean.? stare
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 8:07 pm
1313.EXE Dark Lord Yawgmoth gonk ouch that's a kick in his nuts if there ever was one. -wha's that supposed to mean.? stare your face, that's what! Ok, me and some friends have been wondering, if I play a Biorhythm with no creatures on the field, who dies first? Me or my opponent?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:25 pm
metaljesse 1313.EXE Dark Lord Yawgmoth gonk ouch that's a kick in his nuts if there ever was one. -wha's that supposed to mean.? stare your face, that's what! Ok, me and some friends have been wondering, if I play a Biorhythm with no creatures on the field, who dies first? Me or my opponent? It's supposed to mean that your opponent probably wants to kill you 1313 after getting you down to 2 cards and then you get your deck back sweatdrop As for this question it lies in state-based effect land. If you biorythem and 0 creatures are in play both players life totals are set to 0. After biorythem has resolved ALL state-based effects are checked and applied at once meaning the game sees both your life totals at 0 and both of you die. Ending the game in a draw.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|