|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharkbutt The Orgiastic Crew
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:24 am
Cabron the Swan Wantcookie  You knew something, Sora. You had no basis for suspicion, and yet you pushed and insisted that I was Mafia. There's only one explanation that makes sense to me. Ah, but now I am dead, and you'll get nothing from me. Only a foolishly foolish fool would so foolishly assume that his foolishly foolhardy foolery wouldn't come back to bite him in his foolishly foolish (albeit fine) a** in time, one way or another.
You get what you put in, Herr Fool.  As do you, Frau Redundant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:28 am
Allegro SoThatAznGirl Allegro Clarification: No majority was reached last night, so Scruff was not voted off. The rest of the scene is accurate.
And ratio is now 9:3:1:2, town mad s:kps:neutral.No, because a simple majority has to be reached between all living players. Scruff could have had more votes than the others, but unless it reached the minimum of 8, there would have been no lynch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:31 am
Wantcookie Cabron the Swan Wantcookie You knew something, Sora. You had no basis for suspicion, and yet you pushed and insisted that I was Mafia. There's only one explanation that makes sense to me. Ah, but now I am dead, and you'll get nothing from me. Only a foolishly foolish fool would so foolishly assume that his foolishly foolhardy foolery wouldn't come back to bite him in his foolishly foolish (albeit fine) a** in time, one way or another.
You get what you put in, Herr Fool. As do you, Frau Redundant. 
WHAT WAS THAT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:14 pm
Allegro SoThatAznGirl Allegro Clarification: No majority was reached last night, so Scruff was not voted off. The rest of the scene is accurate.
And ratio is now 9:3:1:2, town mad s:kps:neutral.No, because a simple majority has to be reached between all living players. Scruff could have had more votes than the others, but unless it reached the minimum of 8, there would have been no lynch. Holy crap. THATS what you mean by Majority... ...united we stand?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:22 pm
J of The Wind Allegro SoThatAznGirl Allegro Clarification: No majority was reached last night, so Scruff was not voted off. The rest of the scene is accurate.
And ratio is now 9:3:1:2, town mad s:kps:neutral.No, because a simple majority has to be reached between all living players. Scruff could have had more votes than the others, but unless it reached the minimum of 8, there would have been no lynch. Holy crap. THATS what you mean by Majority... ...united we stand? Hence the "It is Day X. Y players remain. Z number of votes are required for a conviction." I thought it was clear. My bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:30 pm
J of The Wind Allegro SoThatAznGirl Allegro Clarification: No majority was reached last night, so Scruff was not voted off. The rest of the scene is accurate.
And ratio is now 9:3:1:2, town mad s:kps:neutral.No, because a simple majority has to be reached between all living players. Scruff could have had more votes than the others, but unless it reached the minimum of 8, there would have been no lynch. Holy crap. THATS what you mean by Majority... ...united we stand? Pretty much our only option I guess... I thought it was whoever had the most votes would be lynched.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:34 pm
We're trying to eliminate that. After all, what if the mafia had rushed a vote on another player at the end of the day? This requires more cooperation, discussion, and acitivity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:36 pm
Allegro We're trying to eliminate that. After all, what if the mafia had rushed a vote on another player at the end of the day? This requires more cooperation, discussion, and acitivity. So diabolically BRILLIANT! blaugh But definetly tougher...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:54 pm
I don't think we can all be the cooperative. That's something we'll have to think about tonight.
But as for now, I'm just suspicious of Dragn. Hobo was a townie, and all that stuff against him seems kinda suspicious now. And Med is still here. That's all I got.
Anyone sum up the inactives last night?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:26 pm
I feel a bit suspicious of J but that's just me. He hasn't been posting much at all but that may be because he has a tough time to find time for the computer like me right now. I really need to watch people more closely but I'm not really made for this game. sweatdrop
And no offense to Badtz but she seems a tiny bit suspicious too. It could be me though..
Would anyone like to continue this conversation on possible suspects?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:37 pm
I'm afraid I see Cookie's explanation...
What about the people that posted, but didn't do much to help the game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:42 pm
I see. Well, unfortunately I haven't had much time to re-backread because of my babysitting. /: I would've been on earlier today for the lynching but the computer gave me a blue screen and I didn't have the pass to get back on until my cousin got back home. stressed
So Anyways, the point is, I only have my memory to go on. Backreading is not something I can easily do anymore. sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:44 pm
Basically meaning I can't remember much of anyone else posting but not helping with the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:46 pm
Not meaning to say that the people I'm suspecting didn't help. I'm sure Badtz did, but from what I remember, half are bandwagons to Azn's explanations. Course, I could be wrong but that's just memory. xD Always messing up and putting ideas into our heads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
