|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:33 pm
There's no cell wall in a human's body parts, for we do not have plant cells in our bodies for very long if eaten, and the bacteria aren't being targeted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:37 pm
I disagree. Each individual cell in the body has an outer edge, a wall of sorts. What you describe could be achieved if you find a way to burst those cells. Then the sheer amount of particulate matter combined with blood would overload the body and any orafice would excrete blood. In several cases (limbs for instance) where no orafice is available new holes would erupt in the thinner areas of the skin- like pores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:37 pm
Talon TDS I disagree. Each individual cell in the body has an outer edge, a wall of sorts. What you describe could be achieved if you find a way to burst those cells. Then the sheer amount of particulate matter combined with blood would overload the body and any orafice would excrete blood. In several cases (limbs for instance) where no orafice is available new holes would erupt in the thinner areas of the skin- like pores. Animal cells don't have cell walls, they have a more flexible but still manageable cell membrane. But your theory is almost exactly to what I scheme. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:41 pm
walls, membrane . . . same difference. Still, I agree that technology would be difficult. The easiest ways to do this are to either trick the T-Cells in the body to have the white blood cells attack the membranes of all cells around them, or to make nanotechnology with cutting tools to destroy any cell they come in contact with save bone. We would like to have a man standing as he bursts into a gory mess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:43 pm
Talon TDS walls, membrane . . . same difference. Still, I agree that technology would be difficult. The easiest ways to do this are to either trick the T-Cells in the body to have the white blood cells attack the membranes of all cells around them, or to make nanotechnology with cutting tools to destroy any cell they come in contact with save bone. We would like to have a man standing as he bursts into a gory mess. But I don't want instant termination. This is the tricky part as well. I want a slow torturing feeling, and the exits for the blood were as I said, the eyes, nose, mouth corners, ears, and random pores of the chest, lower abdomen, and back. surprised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:49 pm
That being the case, the effect and the cause are still the same. Only use a lesser amount. The more amount used, the more dramatic the immediate effect. If you use less, it takes longer to terminate the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:50 pm
But we need the technology to be put and used in liquified form while still only reaching a point to where it ONLY effects those areas, if somehow, I say make it harmless to the other parts of the body.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:54 pm
Still, the techonology is not different. Already we are talking about nanites, or a genetically engineered virus. Either way, creation is no more complicated than programming. Have the virus only go for certian types of tissue. Have the nanites only destroy certain types of cells. Either way, it is the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:02 pm
Hooray.
Science wins again. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:03 pm
Only if we can prove it. Right now we have a Theory/Hypothesis that is doable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:04 pm
Talon TDS Only if we can prove it. Right now we have a Theory/Hypothesis that is doable. Yay! Off topic, whaddya think of this GAC for mah aviatar?  (last post of the night)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:09 pm
Well, not my style . . . but I suppose it fits you well enough Tana.
I have yet to get my quest completed, so I have a bit of work to do. I just hope I am not putting you in a bad way by asking that wing favour of you . . . sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:09 pm
No scarf.
What on earth are you talking about??????????
Taking over the world? Terminating _____________???????????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:12 pm
Terminating human beings. No specific target named as yet other than Tana voulenteering as a test subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 3:17 pm
Ah. Why do you want to destroy mankind?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
