|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 6:18 pm
Devaroze Oh that sucks.. I just finished converting my Catachan Devil squad, like 20 min ago. I wanted to use them for close combat... now I can only use them as vets with a BS of 4 instead of WS of 4... stare Welcome to 40K game of the ever changeing rules...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 6:50 pm
Lozt_1 Devaroze Oh that sucks.. I just finished converting my Catachan Devil squad, like 20 min ago. I wanted to use them for close combat... now I can only use them as vets with a BS of 4 instead of WS of 4... stare Welcome to 40K game of the ever changeing rules... This is why I stick to makeing beautiful gameing talbes then sell them off after like 2 games. I rarely play anymore.. I just model and create scenery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 11:07 pm
Devaroze Lozt_1 Devaroze Oh that sucks.. I just finished converting my Catachan Devil squad, like 20 min ago. I wanted to use them for close combat... now I can only use them as vets with a BS of 4 instead of WS of 4... stare Welcome to 40K game of the ever changeing rules... This is why I stick to makeing beautiful gameing talbes then sell them off after like 2 games. I rarely play anymore.. I just model and create scenery. It is understandable. As it is, I am not good at the modelling terrain thing, so I go with what I am good at. mrgreen Beating others down HARD. mrgreen mrgreen twisted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 1:05 pm
thats another thing i want to do(make a table top warzone) because i know how because my dad has built 1 befor and i watched him mkae the seanery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 1:44 pm
Devaroze Oh that sucks.. I just finished converting my Catachan Devil squad, like 20 min ago. I wanted to use them for close combat... now I can only use them as vets with a BS of 4 instead of WS of 4... stare What are you going on about ? Catachan Devil squads in Deathworld Vet. Armies have a WS of 4 and a BS4 of 4. And all Deathworld Vets. have a minimum WS of 4. And besides, attached Deathworld Vet. units from Codex: Catachans have been illegal for a long time now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 8:13 pm
WalkingTree Devaroze Oh that sucks.. I just finished converting my Catachan Devil squad, like 20 min ago. I wanted to use them for close combat... now I can only use them as vets with a BS of 4 instead of WS of 4... stare What are you going on about ? Catachan Devil squads in Deathworld Vet. Armies have a WS of 4 and a BS4 of 4. And all Deathworld Vets. have a minimum WS of 4. And besides, attached Deathworld Vet. units from Codex: Catachans have been illegal for a long time now. how are the Catachans illegal?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 8:24 pm
Hans Mueller WalkingTree Devaroze Oh that sucks.. I just finished converting my Catachan Devil squad, like 20 min ago. I wanted to use them for close combat... now I can only use them as vets with a BS of 4 instead of WS of 4... stare What are you going on about ? Catachan Devil squads in Deathworld Vet. Armies have a WS of 4 and a BS4 of 4. And all Deathworld Vets. have a minimum WS of 4. And besides, attached Deathworld Vet. units from Codex: Catachans have been illegal for a long time now. how are the Catachans illegal? Good point considering they were the only codex without an FAQ from 3rd to 4th...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:20 am
Lozt_1 Hans Mueller WalkingTree Devaroze Oh that sucks.. I just finished converting my Catachan Devil squad, like 20 min ago. I wanted to use them for close combat... now I can only use them as vets with a BS of 4 instead of WS of 4... stare What are you going on about ? Catachan Devil squads in Deathworld Vet. Armies have a WS of 4 and a BS4 of 4. And all Deathworld Vets. have a minimum WS of 4. And besides, attached Deathworld Vet. units from Codex: Catachans have been illegal for a long time now. how are the Catachans illegal? Good point considering they were the only codex without an FAQ from 3rd to 4th... unless im understanding this wrong, how could the Catachans be illegal?, because there just another IG army but from another world instead of being cadian or steel legions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 11:46 am
Ehm, GW has re-released the Catachan codex on their web-site in PDF form. Quite a surprise eh? You can find it here!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 12:35 pm
yea... i dont see how the catchans are illegal... as long as you're usin their codex, you should be perfectly fine.... (except maybe a tourny, but sice GW just released the online CODEX:CATCHANS, they would probably be legal...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 2:13 pm
EsgarBlackpoxs yea... i dont see how the catchans are illegal... as long as you're usin their codex, you should be perfectly fine.... (except maybe a tourny, but sice GW just released the online CODEX:CATCHANS, they would probably be legal...) Even if you couldn't use the old Codex: Catachans you could still use the rules for them stated in Codex: Imperial Guard. You just don't get all the nifty special rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:58 pm
thats like saying steal legion, tallarn, mordian, or tanith are illeagel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Are the Tallarn an actual army tho? When I was considering starting a Guard army I looked around for their rules everywhere and alway came up empty handed. I couldn't even find a Fan Site listing house rules for them. Actually, I couldn't even find any models for them that weren't Heavy Weapons in the Archivesof GW. I suppose somewhere they must have a little bit of Fluff at the very least, but are the actually a "codified" army? At any point? The Heavy Metal painters seem to think so, but no one else agrees so far as I can tell. I think they just like the fact that painting things dun and khaki hides the occasional mistake really well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:39 pm
EsgarBlackpoxs yea... i dont see how the catchans are illegal... as long as you're usin their codex, you should be perfectly fine.... (except maybe a tourny, but sice GW just released the online CODEX:CATCHANS, they would probably be legal...) The PDF version is perfectly legal for tournies unless the organizer states differently...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:59 am
A new Tallarn army list will be released in Imperial Armour 3: The Taros Campaign along with a list for the Elysian Drop Troops and a new Tau Sept world force. Though alot of people here will call me an idiot, question my sexual prefences and bloodlines when bringing up Forge World. stare
If you want some fluff on old Imperial Guard armies, try the internet or get your hands on a 3rd Edition codex, it has a short history of most of the major Guard forces.
No army is illegal, where do people get the idea actually? The 'Chan codex had some revisions and is thrown on the web into PDF form probably as an excuse for the jungle rules in the back. With all this Lustria crap going on around here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
