|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:37 pm
Yeah, see, that's why I'm tending to think that Ythan and BDG might not be cannibals. I was so far off with a clue that, looking back, was so easy to solve if we just googled it. Makes me look uber-suspicious.
But you never know. We have only narrowed a few people out of the equation (DDK and Donde)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:43 pm
What I don't get, though, is DEB's clue. So far all it's done is seemingly point us in a completely wrong direction with Kaenko. Even if you err on the side of caution and keep Donde Esta and DDK in the list of suspects, how does it apply to any of them?
Do you think it's possible we might be interpreting my clue the "and without emotion" part of my clue wrong with the mood bubbles?
<.<;;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:44 pm
I like how all the quiet people playing and not delivering still get to vote on a cannibal and not have as big as a risk of being eaten. >:
IM LOOKING AT YOU DONDE, AKELA, NECCA AND FIG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:48 pm
I work 8 or more hour days, shut your face. D:
these clues confuse me and I have to catch up before work everyday.
if a body catch a body
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quotable Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:51 pm
Fig Ivy I work 8 or more hour days, shut your face. D:
these clues confuse me and I have to catch up before work everyday. if a body catch a body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:53 pm
@Fig- I hear you girl. I'm starting work on Monday. And these clues are hella confusing. My interpretations of them are not at all what everyone else is guessing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:53 pm
Morde @Fig- I hear you girl. I'm starting work on Monday. And these clues are hella confusing. My interpretations of them are not at all what everyone else is guessing. Because, you know, mine have been spot on every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:59 pm
Clone the Sputterer Morde @Fig- I hear you girl. I'm starting work on Monday. And these clues are hella confusing. My interpretations of them are not at all what everyone else is guessing. Because, you know, mine have been spot on every time. D: That's not what I was suggesting at all.
I just think some of my interpretations have been lame. With the pointing one I assumed it was like 'it's too early to start accusing people'. I highly doubt that's what Lyd meant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quotable Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:25 pm
I did put my two cents in on my day off..
about who was pointing at who.. O:
if a body catch a body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:34 pm
Sors Has anyone else noticed that the cannibals went right down the line of clues until they got to Clone and then completely skipped him and went straight for VC?
I'm fairly sure that's a muck up on their part. And it proves Clone's clue is fake and Clone is a cannibal.
And hey, I'm not a cannibal, I'm pointing guys. emo  WHY DON'T PEOPLE READ MY POSTS!?!? Dirtay Emo Bunny I don't think Clone is cannibal because he contributes way too much. I also don't think he could get into situations like with Ythan and Brandon on purpose.
Also, notice the pattern of the cannibals' dinners? It goes in clue order but skips over Clone. I think this is to try and make us think it's him, since so many people were gunning for him last time. And that'd be another stupid mistake of ours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:37 pm
The only riddles I remember from The Hobbit are the other one about fish and the one about Bilbo's pocket but I used google.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:42 pm
Ythan II The only riddles I remember from The Hobbit are the other one about fish and the one about Bilbo's pocket but I used google. UHM. I remember, fish, teeth, mountains, egg, time, dark and that one with the sun and stuff... But it's like my favourite book. >>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:47 pm
Clone the Sputterer Apparently the clue is an allusion to the Hobbit: Quote: No legs lay on one leg, Two-legs sat near on three-legs, Four legs got some. In The Hobbit, the answer to the riddle is Quote: Fish on a little table, man at table sitting on a stool, the cat has the bones . Well now, Lydia changed got some to got eaten. If we take the answer from The Hobbit, then the cats are getting eaten. I don't think she would try to tell us that the cats are cannibals by having them be eaten. Well if the cat has the bones, then the cat(s) would be the cannibal(s)...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:51 pm
Dirtay Emo Bunny Clone the Sputterer Apparently the clue is an allusion to the Hobbit: Quote: No legs lay on one leg, Two-legs sat near on three-legs, Four legs got some. In The Hobbit, the answer to the riddle is Quote: Fish on a little table, man at table sitting on a stool, the cat has the bones . Well now, Lydia changed got some to got eaten. If we take the answer from The Hobbit, then the cats are getting eaten. I don't think she would try to tell us that the cats are cannibals by having them be eaten. Well if the cat has the bones, then the cat(s) would be the cannibal(s)... Right. They have the bones in the Hobbit but in this clue, she changed "got some" to "got eaten," so the cat's wouldn't have any bones... they'd just be ... bones. Wouldn't they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:58 pm
Dirtay Emo Bunny Clone the Sputterer Apparently the clue is an allusion to the Hobbit: Quote: No legs lay on one leg, Two-legs sat near on three-legs, Four legs got some. In The Hobbit, the answer to the riddle is Quote: Fish on a little table, man at table sitting on a stool, the cat has the bones . Well now, Lydia changed got some to got eaten. If we take the answer from The Hobbit, then the cats are getting eaten. I don't think she would try to tell us that the cats are cannibals by having them be eaten. Well if the cat has the bones, then the cat(s) would be the cannibal(s)...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
