|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 1:14 pm
It takes two to make a baby, though the women are more prominent in the making. And I'm far too diplomatic as a person to say which one's better, both are important in their own ways. Society would collapse if one sort just disappeared neutral
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 2:56 pm
But if women could create an artificial way of adding that extra little chromosome we would out of the job; but even if men were able to replicate an egg it would still need to be grown and nurtured somewhere and, to tell you the truth, men are just to lazy to go through all that work just to make one little pooping, puking, whining, slobbering baby that we'll just boot out of are life when they are 18 rolleyes . So now do you understand, if a women had a child she would actually care (not that some men wouldn't) and men just don't want to do all the work the women would normally do.
PS: I don't think men can breast feed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:24 pm
did anyone actually read it?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:11 am
I did, but I can't come up with a witty retort at the moment. Especially not since my head's quite stuffed with arguments about abortion right now. It was coincidence, really, I was just looking through a Swedish textbook I might be working with and got stuck at a chapter about argumentation, which contained a few articles about abortion. Quite interesting actually 3nodding
PS: It seemed like it was the men that dealed with unexpected pregnancy the worst, the women seemed quite willing to adapt to a new life, so I guess you have a point, Sage rolleyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 3:30 am
*shrugs* I don't feel like talking completely about the subject because of personal reasons...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 11:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 4:42 pm
Yep, my scythe has a good point
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:32 am
Actually, men are supposed to disappear by like 3000 something based on natural gene mutation or something like that. exclaim
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 1:06 pm
That was also the theme for a REALLY crappy movie. Lots of lesbians. Not good lookin' ones, though. Atleast, that was mostly the case. rolleyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 2:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:58 pm
...what's wrong with lesbians? sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 3:31 am
Sounds like a really crappy movie. But it partially makes me a little glad that I ain't gonna be alive by 3000 something because I generally like guys. Most of my friends are guys 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|