|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:28 am
Montigo Dominic *Re-appears after being gone for like a day or two and gives you PFK* heh... *runs away* It just gets worse. Fast food and genetically modified chicken parts.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 4:07 pm
didn't we agree to try to cut back on the fast food keithing?
Or was that just for that day...?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:50 pm
Montigo Dominic didn't we agree to try to cut back on the fast food keithing? Or was that just for that day...? No, it was in general. Somehow in my twisted brain I thought you were referring to KFC when you typed PFK. What does "PFK" mean anyway...?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 9:57 pm
Keithing No, it was in general. Somehow in my twisted brain I thought you were referring to KFC when you typed PFK. What does "PFK" mean anyway...? Go to Quebec, KFC is called PFK there. So your first assumption was correct.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 11:14 pm
Montigo Dominic Keithing No, it was in general. Somehow in my twisted brain I thought you were referring to KFC when you typed PFK. What does "PFK" mean anyway...? Go to Quebec, KFC is called PFK there. So your first assumption was correct. Strange, considering French has been severely cut back here. "Poulet Frit Kentucky." I sure as hell didn't know.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:45 pm
Montigo Dominic Keithing No, it was in general. Somehow in my twisted brain I thought you were referring to KFC when you typed PFK. What does "PFK" mean anyway...? Go to Quebec, KFC is called PFK there. So your first assumption was correct. crying And it's still disgusting.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 10:46 pm
Indeed. A duly treated chunk of chicken by any other name would be just as greasy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:00 pm
Kokoryta crying And it's still disgusting. You know it :p If they drop a piece on the floor, they throw it back in the grease it kills everything on the surface.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:31 pm
Montigo Dominic If they drop a piece on the floor, they throw it back in the grease it kills everything on the surface. It kills, but what about cleaning? I beginning to think the layer of breaded grit is part of the "secret recipe." eek
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:20 pm
JoVo CannibalisticSpork Vague CannibalisticSpork When I finally got comfortable with myself and got the attitude of "I could care less what people think" things got a little bit easier... How did caring what they think make it easier? I said I could care less what people thought... as in I don't care what people think of me...And he's saying that if you could care less, then you must care now, which contradicts the context of your statement. In other words, Vague is telling you that your diction is shoddy via the use of irony. Indeed. Now if you had said you couldn't care less, that would mean you cared so little that it was not possible to care less, which is what people are usually trying to convey when saying something of that sort. Shimbo-kun I DID have a few traumatizing experiences, but none of them affected me psychologically. ??? JoVo]
We care because we love. 3nodding [/quote] A little harsh in places, but... heart
[quote="Pogo stare It's Sporky! You don't look too young to me, though... maybe if you shaved. JoVo *let 's go over your shoes* eek Pell Pogo? The chicken? Or was that pojo?? hmmm... pollo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:30 pm
Vague JoVo *let 's go over your shoes* eek Funny. I thought the third person singular present form of the verb to let was lets.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:37 pm
JoVo Vague JoVo *let 's go over your shoes* eek Funny. I thought the third person singular present form of the verb to let was lets. It is. The apostrophe was yours, I just highlighted it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:43 pm
Go to my journal for pictures of me (and one of teffy) with cowz0rs...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|