|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:45 pm
NUUUUU ITZ A TRAP! KYOSUKE, BEWARE THE OF THE HOMOSEXUAL CAFE OWNER!!!!!!!
just felt like being random
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:20 pm
In the immortal words of Admiral "It's a Trap!" Ackbar; "IT'S A TRAP!"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:32 pm
Just chillin, got home from school not too long ago. I'll be MIA for a bit, gatta refocus on my writing, as well as I have a job interview. If this interview falls through, I do have a back up that'll take me, it's just... a morning job...
But yea, for most part, i wont really be around, I'll still post when I can, (like now) but other then that, good luck trying to find me; I got s**t to do and not enough night light to do it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
RIP IN PEACE RIP Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travis Celendel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:15 pm
Trust me Vain, I know exactly what you mean. I'm lucky enoough to be able to take a break before the company says Go and I have to write a sequel.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:48 am
OMG, what a load of bullshit for a UN resolution. Not to mention horrible grammar: Quote: Argument: UN Law "Rights of Minorities and Women" BAD!!! Article I say "No one race or culture is better than another." What mean "better"? UN law not tell what "better" mean. This not protect any rights. Article II say "Males and Females should be treated as equals. Whether it be in the workplace or at home". What mean "equals"? UN law not tell what "equal" mean. This not protect any rights. Article III say "Not a single religion or belief is better or more right than another." This not tell what "better" mean either. Not tell what "right" mean. This not protect any rights. Article IV say: "One should have the right to express their love for a member of the same sex." What "express their love" mean? UN law not say. This not protect any rights. UN law use word "should" too much. Not strong word. UN law not protect rights of minorities. Only mention "race" once in preamble part. Mention "race or culture" in Article I. Never mention again. UN law not protect rights of women. Only say "should be treated as equals" in Article II. Never mention again. UN law "Discrimination Accord" protect some rights. "Discrimination Accord" GOOD!!! "Discrimination Accord" still protect rights after this repealed. "Rights of Minorities and Women" not protect any rights. UN Law "Rights of Minorities and Women" do nothing, just happy words to make UN people feel good. Stand in way of new law that protect rights. UN Law "Rights of Minorities and Women" BAD!!! UN repeal. Votes For: 647 Votes Against: 372 I can't believe people are actually voting for this one
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIP IN PEACE RIP Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:27 am
And people wonder why i refuse to join the UN.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:46 am
meh. could be worse. The Hulk (SMASH!!!) makes a decent point though, there being no clearly defined explanation of what Race is. Also, he states that the wording is weak and that it really protects nothing.(I know I SHOULD stop killing people, but its so damn fun...) The Hulk UN Law "Rights of Minorities and Women" do nothing, just happy words to make UN people feel good. Stand in way of new law that protect rights.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Travis Celendel Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:56 am
Yes, but that same argument is a double-edge sword. Yes, it may not clearly define everything, but that is to protect those same rights; with clear definitions, people would be able to abuse those definitions to form loopholes in those same definite laws. Loopholes still exist, but not on such a high scale as they would if this law was more sspecific. And also, the propasal to "Get rid of this so new laws that do protect rights" is completely flawed as well as hypocritical, as getting rid of it only allows the discrimination to get more prevalent while such people wait for supposed new laws that in the end will be no better or more helpful than the current one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:35 am
It really doesn't matter. That will probably fail because it seems like a spam proposal. Those are actually not "legal" to propose so it will probably be killed before it get's enacted. I'll read it later and see before I vote on it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:45 pm
Now things oughtta get interesting, with Nuba bringing up valid points to Shlag(A few lines courtesy of the movie 300) and laughing at her threats. Which, he is telling the truth, if he dies, the seal is lost to them, and Auctoritania will procure it to "Purge" the Torasian Threat. Of course, that won't happen, as I don't plan on having Nuba die
Oh, and the whole "We love our Emperor he is god and you are filth and we are better than you because he says so" deal is awesome, in is making this plot more fun than I had originally expected
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:18 pm
They're based on the Warhammer 40K's Space Marines. The God Emperor is truly the closest thing to a God that a man can reach. He's been alive for I believe 30,000 years. He's such a strong psyker that he's used a beacon for all ships in the Warp. That's saying something when your psychic powers are strong enough to pierce into parallel universe.
And as for Sal Torasian Space Marines being based off of the Imperial Space Marines, they wont be budged. All of them are genetically enhanced, and their training pushes out all room for doubt that the Emperor is in fact their God. Especially among the elite units like the Blue Nymphs. Even when questioned about their faith, they're unwavering in their devotion. So nothing Nuba says will ever even come remotely close to nudge them from it. For they know that when they question their devotion, bad things happen. And I don't mean being executed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:55 pm
We will start to find out much more about Shlag and the Space Marines.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:10 pm
I'm voting for the repeal of that UN mandate. That way it goes away.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:41 pm
OMG, Yes! I found out today Shaw's called on Monday, they want me in for a second interview as soon as I am available. So I am going down there tomorrow to setup a date. If it goes as well as the past interview, I will ahve a job(Finally!)
Ryu, I am thinking of having Kaguya assault Taki with Tengu, after he ,eets with his superiors. And you might want to check your post, I don't think Shizue would be beating up on Nuba at this moment blaugh
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|