|
|
|
|
|
RMS-141--XekuEins--Type-3 Crew
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:37 pm
OH!
Okay! ^.^
Cool dramallama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:43 pm
wow now how did this get so off topic? i have to go with ZAFT's ZGMF-X31S Abyss. that is the best damn underwater ms i have ever seen. next being the EFF's GAT-707E Forbidden Vortex. now if we are just talking about mp units i have to go with the GAT-706S Deep Forbidden and then ZAFT's UMF-5 ZnO. (no i haven't just seen seed i just think thier under water ms are better than any of the other series's.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:28 am
gundam fan zero wow now how did this get so off topic? **Slowly raises hand*** sweatdrop Heh heh.... ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:58 pm
i blaim u. now post something at least slightly relivent to make up for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:33 am
gonk But I know so very little!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:11 pm
then do something i like to call research. read up on it, or at the very least put what u do know. and when i say that i mean revlivent things, not more random crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:19 pm
Wow, dude, if you read the main title of the whole guild you will see RANDOMNESS in the title.
Topics always go off in random directions.
You dont have to bite off her head just because she was the one who made it random.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:21 pm
um i wasn't. if i was my post would have been all caps and much more rude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 3:19 pm
anyways, seed units suck major a**. I would rather have a Zeonic Company Hygogg then a crappy a** Vortex, much less the Abyss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS-141--XekuEins--Type-3 Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:17 pm
really then tell me why they are better ms and more advanced? give me a decent reason why u thonk they "suck a**". otherwise u have no reason to say such things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:11 am
Guh like I have time in my life for research.
And if you must know I base how I like a gundam off three measly standards. (Mostly because like I said before I don't have time for research-> thats what Xeku's for 3nodding heart lol I should add afourth standard.... ninja )
A) Is it cool looking and do I like the colors.
B) (If I've seen the show-> which is sorta rare T.T) Do I / Did I like the pilot and/or what type of gundam it is. Did I think they matched etc....
annnd C) Whether or not it gets destryoed in the story (Why like something thats gonna go bye bye?)
(My fourth one can be-> if Xeku [and Demon too...sometimes] tell me stuff that makes me like 'em. I have absolutely nooo problem with any biases they might have ^.^)
And BTW my randomness is not crap. I personally find it highly enjoyable and I'm sorry if you have a problem with it but ( to pull a move from my first grade repetoire) I was here first and no one else said they hated it so xp .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:25 pm
i was just joking i like randomness too. though some of my friends hate me at times for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:39 pm
gundam fan zero really then tell me why they are better ms and more advanced? give me a decent reason why u thonk they "suck a**". otherwise u have no reason to say such things. dude, U.C. and Seed are different series, one based off of probable science and the other uber godlike actions. Seed units for one suck becuase first season units (excluding the 2 ubers at the end) used batteries. U.C. units from the start used ultracompact fusion reactors. another fact, beam weapons don't work under water no matter what anyone says. Basically seed underwater units are just make believe compared to the future science underwater units of U.C. timeline
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS-141--XekuEins--Type-3 Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:51 pm
Why don't they work underwater?
'lectricity??? neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
