|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:44 am
Curium I know I'm not a moderator or anything, but I don't think we're allowed to have abortion debates in Fire Fall. Fortunately for all of us, there's a sticky for the purpose of clarifying what is or isn't allowed. Let's see what it has to say: Quote: ARGUMENTS WE DON'T WANT TO SEE AGAIN Evolution vs. Creationism: We see the same arguments over and over in this particular debate. Most of them have been addressed in the Talk Origins FAQ. Please refer to the FAQ before starting any threads on the topic. If your particular question or argument is not addressed there, then feel free to start a thread on the subject. Homosexuality and Christianity: Again, we see the same arguments over and over again. Most (if not all) of these have been addressed in The Thesis by Ananel. Please read over The Thesis carefully before starting any thread on the subject. If your particular argument or question is not addressed by The Thesis, then starting a thread would not be out of order. Catholics (and Mormons, Adventists and other sects): Do not start any threads arguing for or against the correctness in interpretation and belief of one sect over another. Such threads will be locked and the OP will be warned. Subsequent violations will resulting in the violator being banned from the guild. Debate away! My two cents: Abortion is a-okay, from a moral and (more importantly) legal standpoint. A fetus is not a person. Just as an apple is not a tree, a fetus is not a person. But I have no way to justify this from a Biblical standpoint, which is why I've stayed out of this discussion so far (and will continue to do so, unless someone mounts a secular argument).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:46 am
Sinner My two cents: Abortion is a-okay, from a moral and (more importantly) legal standpoint. A fetus is not a person. Just as an apple is not a tree, a fetus is not a person. But I have no way to justify this from a Biblical standpoint, which is why I've stayed out of this discussion so far (and will continue to do so, unless someone mounts a secular argument). Here's my shot at a secular arguement. The fetus falls under all scientific classifications for life. It consumes sustinance, it grows, it has the capacity to reproduce (at least, the same capacity for any pre-pubescent animal), and has the capacity to 'think' (in the same way animals can, albeit). There's a few more, but I seem to have forgotten them right now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:32 pm
Cometh The Inquisitor Sinner My two cents: Abortion is a-okay, from a moral and (more importantly) legal standpoint. A fetus is not a person. Just as an apple is not a tree, a fetus is not a person. But I have no way to justify this from a Biblical standpoint, which is why I've stayed out of this discussion so far (and will continue to do so, unless someone mounts a secular argument). Here's my shot at a secular arguement. The fetus falls under all scientific classifications for life. It consumes sustinance, it grows, it has the capacity to reproduce (at least, the same capacity for any pre-pubescent animal), and has the capacity to 'think' (in the same way animals can, albeit). There's a few more, but I seem to have forgotten them right now. Yeah, I'm going to have to go with the "Congratulations, you've proven it's a mouse." line here. We all saw this coming, right? I admit, the exact point where a non-person becomes a person is a very sticky subject, but abortions tend to be done far before the fetus enters a grey area.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:10 pm
Sinner Curium I know I'm not a moderator or anything, but I don't think we're allowed to have abortion debates in Fire Fall. Fortunately for all of us, there's a sticky for the purpose of clarifying what is or isn't allowed. Let's see what it has to say: Quote: ARGUMENTS WE DON'T WANT TO SEE AGAIN Evolution vs. Creationism: We see the same arguments over and over in this particular debate. Most of them have been addressed in the Talk Origins FAQ. Please refer to the FAQ before starting any threads on the topic. If your particular question or argument is not addressed there, then feel free to start a thread on the subject. Homosexuality and Christianity: Again, we see the same arguments over and over again. Most (if not all) of these have been addressed in The Thesis by Ananel. Please read over The Thesis carefully before starting any thread on the subject. If your particular argument or question is not addressed by The Thesis, then starting a thread would not be out of order. Catholics (and Mormons, Adventists and other sects): Do not start any threads arguing for or against the correctness in interpretation and belief of one sect over another. Such threads will be locked and the OP will be warned. Subsequent violations will resulting in the violator being banned from the guild. Debate away! I had read that previously, but I had thought before someone told us if we wanted to debate on abortion then we had to take it to the ED abortion thread. I guess I was wrong...thank you for clarifying.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 4:49 pm
Sinner I admit, the exact point where a non-person becomes a person is a very sticky subject, but abortions tend to be done far before the fetus enters a grey area. Quite true. I, personally believe that, since it has the capacity to be a human being, once conceived, the fetus is afforded all rights of any other human being.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:34 pm
Cometh The Inquisitor Sinner I admit, the exact point where a non-person becomes a person is a very sticky subject, but abortions tend to be done far before the fetus enters a grey area. Quite true. I, personally believe that, since it has the capacity to be a human being, once conceived, the fetus is afforded all rights of any other human being. And I'd like to take this moment to point out that you can backtrack that even farther. A sperm and an egg have the capacity to be a human being. If you have a sperm and an egg, but you don't combine them, you are taking something that has the capacity to be a human being and killing it. Merely being a fetus isn't a particularly strong distinction.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:10 pm
Holypimp foomonster Since I'm tired of christians saying stuff like "abortion is wrong, the bible said so", I shall show you each passages of the bible that clearly advocate abortion. Hosea 9:11-16 Hosea prays for God’s intervention. “Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer. Give them, 0 Lord: what wilt thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. . .Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit: yea though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.”Numbers 31:17 (Moses) “Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every women that hath known man by lying with him.”Yes, god is saying to kill all the suspected pregnant women, which also kills the fetus. Hosea 13:16 God promises to dash to pieces the infants of Samaria and the “their women with child shall be ripped up”. Having the unborn child taken out of the womb...mmhmm, that sounds very pro-life to me. Edit: Hey, do you see this note? Yeah, start following what it says. DO NOT USE YOUR SIGNATURE IN THIS GUILD. IT HAS A CURSE WORD AND IS OFFENSIVE. I disagree with you completally. First off when God was talking to moses he was talking about the women who had sex outside the security of marriage, which is Strictly forbidden In the Bible, and the punishment back then was to be stoned to death. As far as the samaritans there is probabally some reason that they are being ripped up. Instead of taking only certain verses look at the entire context of the verse. The Bible does clearly state in case im mistaken that Murder is wrong...the definiton of murder is the taking of someones life...whether you want to believe it or not and whether the government wants to believe it or not The BABY NOT FETUS is alive at conception and CAN FEEL PAIN I have to agree with you on the fact that a "fetus" can feel pain. i don't remember being in the womb (of course), but i can tell u a little story from my "womb life" that might help. so... it was near time for me to be born (i don't know HOW close, but pretty darn close), and lo and behold, my umbilical(sp?) cord was wrapped around my throat! my mom says that the doctor says that i was struggling a lot to get that thing off of around my neck (i almost died from it)... as a result of this i was born with a hernia (because my umbilical cord was pulling on my stomach)..... if i wasn't really "a living thing", then how come i didn't want to die?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:35 pm
NinjaGirl16 I have to agree with you on the fact that a "fetus" can feel pain. i don't remember being in the womb (of course), but i can tell u a little story from my "womb life" that might help. so... it was near time for me to be born (i don't know HOW close, but pretty darn close), and lo and behold, my umbilical(sp?) cord was wrapped around my throat! my mom says that the doctor says that i was struggling a lot to get that thing off of around my neck (i almost died from it)... as a result of this i was born with a hernia (because my umbilical cord was pulling on my stomach)..... if i wasn't really "a living thing", then how come i didn't want to die? Since this is a rather secular argument, I think I'll address this one. The question is not whether or not the fetus is living. Plenty of things are living. Muscles are living. And the question is not whether or not the fetus thinks. Plenty of things think. Mice think. And the question is not whether or not the fetus has a will to live. Plenty of things have a will to live. Cows have a will to live. But all of these things can be killed, legally and ethically, without too much of a problem. So your reasons for preserving the life of the fetus obviously do not apply, since the same reasons could apply to other beings which we have no problem killing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:03 pm
Sinner NinjaGirl16 I have to agree with you on the fact that a "fetus" can feel pain. i don't remember being in the womb (of course), but i can tell u a little story from my "womb life" that might help. so... it was near time for me to be born (i don't know HOW close, but pretty darn close), and lo and behold, my umbilical(sp?) cord was wrapped around my throat! my mom says that the doctor says that i was struggling a lot to get that thing off of around my neck (i almost died from it)... as a result of this i was born with a hernia (because my umbilical cord was pulling on my stomach)..... if i wasn't really "a living thing", then how come i didn't want to die? Since this is a rather secular argument, I think I'll address this one. The question is not whether or not the fetus is living. Plenty of things are living. Muscles are living. And the question is not whether or not the fetus thinks. Plenty of things think. Mice think. And the question is not whether or not the fetus has a will to live. Plenty of things have a will to live. Cows have a will to live. But all of these things can be killed, legally and ethically, without too much of a problem. So your reasons for preserving the life of the fetus obviously do not apply, since the same reasons could apply to other beings which we have no problem killing. that was not my "main reason" for preserving the life of a fetus. i was simply notifying foomonster that a fetus can feel. i would talk more, but i just got a phone call and have to gather information about some references for a mission's trip... i'll be back in about an hour and 45 minutes... somewhere in there
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:22 pm
Sinner And I'd like to take this moment to point out that you can backtrack that even farther. A sperm and an egg have the capacity to be a human being. If you have a sperm and an egg, but you don't combine them, you are taking something that has the capacity to be a human being and killing it. Merely being a fetus isn't a particularly strong distinction. I'd say that the sperm and the egg have the capacity (though not hte likelyhood) of becoming something that has the capacity to become a human. This disqualifies them from rights.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:27 pm
NinjaGirl16 I have to agree with you on the fact that a "fetus" can feel pain. i don't remember being in the womb (of course), but i can tell u a little story from my "womb life" that might help. so... it was near time for me to be born (i don't know HOW close, but pretty darn close), and lo and behold, my umbilical(sp?) cord was wrapped around my throat! my mom says that the doctor says that i was struggling a lot to get that thing off of around my neck (i almost died from it)... as a result of this i was born with a hernia (because my umbilical cord was pulling on my stomach)..... if i wasn't really "a living thing", then how come i didn't want to die? That doesn't seem rght... I though one didn't have long-term potentiation untill around two.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:59 pm
Cometh The Inquisitor NinjaGirl16 I have to agree with you on the fact that a "fetus" can feel pain. i don't remember being in the womb (of course), but i can tell u a little story from my "womb life" that might help. so... it was near time for me to be born (i don't know HOW close, but pretty darn close), and lo and behold, my umbilical(sp?) cord was wrapped around my throat! my mom says that the doctor says that i was struggling a lot to get that thing off of around my neck (i almost died from it)... as a result of this i was born with a hernia (because my umbilical cord was pulling on my stomach)..... if i wasn't really "a living thing", then how come i didn't want to die? That doesn't seem rght... I though one didn't have long-term potentiation untill around two. by "potentiation" u r refering to physiological action, correct?... just making sure i understand wut u're saying(don't know how soon i can respond to wutever u say cuz i'm still waiting for the mission's trip ppl to call back)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:05 pm
NinjaGirl16 by "potentiation" u r refering to physiological action, correct?... just making sure i understand wut u're saying(don't know how soon i can respond to wutever u say cuz i'm still waiting for the mission's trip ppl to call back) Wikipedia Long-term memory (LTM) is memory that can last as little as 30 seconds or as long as decades. It differs structurally and functionally from working memory or short-term memory, which ostensibly stores items for only around 30 seconds. Biologically, short-term memory is a temporary potentiation of neural connections that can become long-term memory through the process of rehearsal and meaningful association. The proposed mechanism by which short-term memories move into LTM storage is via long-term potentiation, which leads to a physical change in the structure of neurons. Notably, the time scale involved at each level of memory processing remains under investigation. That's what I mean. [EDIT] NinjaGirl16 i would talk more, but i just got a phone call and have to gather information about some references for a mission's trip... i'll be back in about an hour and 45 minutes... somewhere in there Hey, I just got done filling out my passport for a missions trip to Jamaica this summer.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:29 pm
Cometh The Inquisitor I'd say that the sperm and the egg have the capacity (though not hte likelyhood) of becoming something that has the capacity to become a human. This disqualifies them from rights. Wait, how the deuce does a fetus have the "likelihood", but not an egg and a sperm? And if the mother plans on having an abortion, doesn't that mean that the "likelihood" of the fetus becoming a human is greatly reduced, disqualifying it from its rights as a human?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:33 pm
Sinner Wait, how the deuce does a fetus have the "likelihood", but not an egg and a sperm? Because of the fact that we get an entirely new set of sperm every few days or so (the old ones die and are absorbed... Or something like that), and the females menstruate (killing a few eggs). The likely hood of a sperm becoming a human is so extremely small, it's not even worht it to consider it. Quote: And if the mother plans on having an abortion, doesn't that mean that the "likelihood" of the fetus becoming a human is greatly reduced, disqualifying it from its rights as a human? Murder vastly reduces a persons likelyhood of living, that does not mean that the person has no rights to live.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|