|
|
|
|
|
ElladanKenet Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:21 am
I wasn't talking about that at all, Seph.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:32 am
Well the last page of talk on Nightsisters, control over Neutral Force Users and ways of implimenting it beg to differ.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Sephiroth_2000 Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ElladanKenet Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:15 pm
I never once mentioned Nightsisters. That's been you. I've been busy advocating for how we choose who get to be force-adept.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:33 pm
I think I mentionted the nightsisters...however, that was for an example. I didn't mean that we should actually start a group for the nightsisters...or the sorcerers of tund. It was more of 'these are groups of force adepts that exist already in star wars' not 'we should have these groups in the RP'
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sephiroth_2000 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:26 pm
ElladanKenet I never once mentioned Nightsisters. That's been you. I've been busy advocating for how we choose who get to be force-adept. Nightsister was merely mentioned as an example (of which had already been mentioned) of Force Adepts (though not limited to Non-Jedi) which you had mentioned. This topic is about the selection of Jedi/Dark Jedi, not Neutral Force Users. Please stay on topic.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:49 pm
Cmon folks we dont need pages of disagreements and stuff lets get this figured out and get on with it! The most common agreement is no force users in the begging, but gradual acceptance to potential. and training.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ElladanKenet Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Whatever. I won't argue any more.
EDIT- My first comment was about my views on Non-Jedi/Sith Force Adepts. Ok, so I made one comment on them. That was just my view on the situation. Anywho, let's just move on. >>
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:52 pm
I do like the mission system. but i think the complexity of a mission should be more important than who many you do. It can take a good 3 months to wrap up a good story branch.
I also noticed someone brought up Wedge earlier and other occupations. I personally think that being a sole fighter pilot would be rather boring. You don't get to fight face to face so it may become repetitive. To have effective two sided pilot rping you would need a substantial amount of fighters on each side. In addition casualties for a space battle tend to be allot higher than a Jedi strike mission. Unless each person rped a whole squadron, you'd realistically run out of pilots fast.
Back to the Jedi-ish stuff. So we've seen that rp samples don't always get it right the first time. New applicants constantly need to rewrite their samples. And then there was no guarantee that they'd stick with the new style. What if it was an unspoken rule that anyone who missed the rp style the fist time around (brief guild lines would be given-aka no 1st person, paragraph form) Had to stick with not being force sensitive/wielding until they proved them selves competent in the rp requirements.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ElladanKenet Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:14 pm
AvianFlame I do like the mission system. but i think the complexity of a mission should be more important than who many you do. It can take a good 3 months to wrap up a good story branch. I also noticed someone brought up Wedge earlier and other occupations. I personally think that being a sole fighter pilot would be rather boring. You don't get to fight face to face so it may become repetitive. To have effective two sided pilot rping you would need a substantial amount of fighters on each side. In addition casualties for a space battle tend to be allot higher than a Jedi strike mission. Unless each person rped a whole squadron, you'd realistically run out of pilots fast. Back to the Jedi-ish stuff. So we've seen that rp samples don't always get it right the first time. New applicants constantly need to rewrite their samples. And then there was no guarantee that they'd stick with the new style. What if it was an unspoken rule that anyone who missed the rp style the fist time around (brief guild lines would be given-aka no 1st person, paragraph form) Had to stick with not being force sensitive/wielding until they proved them selves competent in the rp requirements. Sounds good
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:48 pm
Thought I'd throw my input in.. haven't read ALL the discussion so far, but this is how I've seen the force user thing done...
Make people, when requesting to join, send a roleplay sample. If they are literate enough, allow them to be Force sensative, then have the jedi masters/sith lords determine if they are accepted into the Jedi, or Sith, or if they are just adepts.
Just an idea... ^^;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|