Welcome to Gaia! ::

I heard this great quote not too long ago that I felt people should apply tot he third HP movie. "Never judge a book by the movie". sweatdrop Though I'll probably go see the fourth out of pure loyalty.

Edit: I removed the stupid

I know what you mean about bad movies. I have seen some horrible ones in my day...You ever hear of the book Fahrenheit 451? Well...they made a movie out of it... for your own sake, don't see it.

Anyway, I know nothing of this "new villain" of which you speak...not for Harry Potter, anyway...do you mean for the Hitchhiker's Guide movie? ...

'Sokay. It happens. sweatdrop

I know. I was severely disappointed in the third movie. I know they'll have to cut some stuff out of the fourth movie, in order to keep the time somewhere under, oh...12 hours, but I hope they don't leave out or change anything I'm really looking forward to. That's what really irritated me about the third movie. >_O;

I know... the two first movies were okay... but the third... hello? it's was totally f*cked... *shakes head* I'm gonna see nr. 4 too out of pure loyalty, and am gonna buy it too... sweatdrop but the hopes are somewhat low after nr. 3... crying

I wasn't entirely disappointed about the third movie ( and the third book is my fav becuase Sirius kicks in), yeah I was angry at how Remus turned out to be but at the end accepted him, it's wasn't exactly the image I have of him. The atmosphere of the movie was awesome though, I bit more creepy thatn the book was supposed to. The dementors were awesome. I heard people saying Alfonso should had make the fifth one intead the third one since the fifth book involves more mystery.

Then again Alfonso changed the childish face of the character in previous movies. I heard he went to few british school and observe the teenagers, how they dress and all, and not all of them were tidy like the first two movie, beside you heard what Tonks says when she see the dursley's tidy house and Harry's messy room "ah that's much better" Means wizards aren't tidy and organized people. sweatdrop

I can say that the third one and what we had seen from the forth one looks magical thatn the first two. I liked Alfonso's touches on each scene. He placed so many detail, felings, mystery in each scene that Colombus lacked of. So we can easyly differe Alfonso's and Colombus's work. The firt two were ok, but I found them rushy and I dunno I felt like there was something missing. (And it's not details from the book that they cut.)

I can point that Colombus did a mistake to where he placed the Woomping Willow. Alfonso asked J.K Rowling for a map of the Hogwarts Grounds before working with the scenario, castle, lake and even the Woomping willow. I liked the third one because the atmosphere of the ground was more faifthful to the book. Hogwarts is much more than a castle with bricks and Alfonso added the touch Colombus was missing. And we'll see more of it in the fourth one. 3nodding Hopefully.

And maybe I'll end up liking the fourth one or continue to like the third one (each time I see it, I can fee myself at hogwarts and just make me want to write stories, the other two did not gave me that feeling) wink

I don't know if the Marauders were in the third book as much as the fourth and fifth. Lupin and Sirius didn't tell much about James and Wormtail, if I remember correctly. *shrug* Just an poinion, I gues.