|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 8:03 pm
 @Hirun: Wow, what a surefire way to show your maturity.If you can't take it, don't dish it out =/
@Shoy: Calm down, I was kidding. I have enough braincells to tell the difference between adding to a game and changing it entirely, I just though it'd be funny to point out
However, not all of DeGei's ideas change the game entirely. Most of them are just evening out the sides by adding more killer-friendly roles
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 8:40 pm
system malfunction @Hirun: Wow, what a surefire way to show your maturity.If you can't take it, don't dish it out =/
@Shoy: Calm down, I was kidding. I have enough braincells to tell the difference between adding to a game and changing it entirely, I just though it'd be funny to point out
However, not all of DeGei's ideas change the game entirely. Most of them are just evening out the sides by adding more killer-friendly roles 
No offense, but you were being much worse than Hirun, practically stating that he couldn't have a negative opinion on it just because he didn't want to be a tester.
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 8:40 pm
I don't know DG, that sounds a little complicated. I guess it's good that you aren't starting with that one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 8:50 pm
Dukes system malfunction @Hirun: Wow, what a surefire way to show your maturity.If you can't take it, don't dish it out =/
@Shoy: Calm down, I was kidding. I have enough braincells to tell the difference between adding to a game and changing it entirely, I just though it'd be funny to point out
However, not all of DeGei's ideas change the game entirely. Most of them are just evening out the sides by adding more killer-friendly roles
No offense, but you were being much worse than Hirun, practically stating that he couldn't have a negative opinion on it just because he didn't want to be a tester.
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
Can you have a definate opinion on something you know almost nothing about? It's just common sense
And I don't really care if you think that, because you have no proof. If I thought he was just trying to start his own sniper game, I wouldn't have let him use my guild. Why would I want to compete with my favorite guild? Besides, he's testing how different roles would work with eachother and how certain rules would work. I think a KH-based game is a bit silly myself, but I won't know if it could be fun or not until I've seen it in action
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:28 pm
Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:41 pm
DeGei Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed. Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:51 pm
OMGG KIRAA/DEATHNOTEE <3
I should TOTALLY Join XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:54 pm
KingShoy DeGei Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed. Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3" With that attitude, we wouldnt have Mario 64, Sonic&Knuckles, or that Megaman game with Tron Bonne. Which also could lead to no Super Smash brothers as taking the characters out of the original games would be blasphemy in your scenario. Changing things can be good as long as the basics are true to the original, Im not making Shadow the Hedgehog out of the original Sonic here, Im making Ocarina of Time out of the original Legend of Zelda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:12 pm
DeGei KingShoy DeGei Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed. Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3" With that attitude, we wouldnt have Mario 64, Sonic&Knuckles, or that Megaman game with Tron Bonne. Which also could lead to no Super Smash brothers as taking the characters out of the original games would be blasphemy in your scenario. Changing things can be good as long as the basics are true to the original, Im not making Shadow the Hedgehog out of the original Sonic here, Im making Ocarina of Time out of the original Legend of Zelda. By changing the gameplay to Sonic, while still keeping the mindless questing. But again, I wish to stop commenting till I've seen the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:44 am
DeGei Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed.
Might not have been your idea, but nobody else siezed hold of it and took control.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:45 am
DeGei KingShoy DeGei Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed. Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3" With that attitude, we wouldnt have Mario 64, Sonic&Knuckles, or that Megaman game with Tron Bonne. Which also could lead to no Super Smash brothers as taking the characters out of the original games would be blasphemy in your scenario. Changing things can be good as long as the basics are true to the original, Im not making Shadow the Hedgehog out of the original Sonic here, Im making Ocarina of Time out of the original Legend of Zelda.
No... you're really much more making Shadow out of Sonic than Ocarina out of Zelda. You're DRASTICALLY changing things, same as Shadow did with the Sonic franchise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:02 am
Dukes DeGei KingShoy DeGei Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed. Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3" With that attitude, we wouldnt have Mario 64, Sonic&Knuckles, or that Megaman game with Tron Bonne. Which also could lead to no Super Smash brothers as taking the characters out of the original games would be blasphemy in your scenario. Changing things can be good as long as the basics are true to the original, Im not making Shadow the Hedgehog out of the original Sonic here, Im making Ocarina of Time out of the original Legend of Zelda.
No... you're really much more making Shadow out of Sonic than Ocarina out of Zelda. You're DRASTICALLY changing things, same as Shadow did with the Sonic franchise.
Shadow changed the feel of the game from a speed platformer, to a shooter. Ocarina took Zelda basics and expanded into a 3D world. Im not entirely remaking the Sniper game, Im working with the basics and mixing and matching them to a new setup and adding in natural expansions to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:05 am
DeGei Dukes DeGei KingShoy DeGei Dukes
DeGei's stating that this is just to test potential scenarios for the game, but that's just bull if you ask me. I think he just wants to be a GM, after all, once the testers have played the scenario, what's the point of reusing it in the main game? Seriously.
As I said before, this wasnt even my idea, it evolved from the previous discussion of changing the game at all. And why wouldnt we reuse them? I mean the sniper game is at round ten now, so its been reused 9 times, why are we still playing it? So the roles can be redistributed and strategies can be changed. Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3" With that attitude, we wouldnt have Mario 64, Sonic&Knuckles, or that Megaman game with Tron Bonne. Which also could lead to no Super Smash brothers as taking the characters out of the original games would be blasphemy in your scenario. Changing things can be good as long as the basics are true to the original, Im not making Shadow the Hedgehog out of the original Sonic here, Im making Ocarina of Time out of the original Legend of Zelda.
No... you're really much more making Shadow out of Sonic than Ocarina out of Zelda. You're DRASTICALLY changing things, same as Shadow did with the Sonic franchise.
Shadow changed the feel of the game from a speed platformer, to a shooter. Ocarina took Zelda basics and expanded into a 3D world. Im not entirely remaking the Sniper game, Im working with the basics and mixing and matching them to a new setup and adding in natural expansions to that.
No.. you're taking the idea of a game with a killer and people finding the killers, that' it, tossing out the rest of what makes the sniper game, and pushing other junk in. It won't be the sniper game anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:08 am
Dukes DeGei Dukes DeGei KingShoy Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3" With that attitude, we wouldnt have Mario 64, Sonic&Knuckles, or that Megaman game with Tron Bonne. Which also could lead to no Super Smash brothers as taking the characters out of the original games would be blasphemy in your scenario. Changing things can be good as long as the basics are true to the original, Im not making Shadow the Hedgehog out of the original Sonic here, Im making Ocarina of Time out of the original Legend of Zelda.
No... you're really much more making Shadow out of Sonic than Ocarina out of Zelda. You're DRASTICALLY changing things, same as Shadow did with the Sonic franchise.
Shadow changed the feel of the game from a speed platformer, to a shooter. Ocarina took Zelda basics and expanded into a 3D world. Im not entirely remaking the Sniper game, Im working with the basics and mixing and matching them to a new setup and adding in natural expansions to that.
No.. you're taking the idea of a game with a killer and people finding the killers, that' it, tossing out the rest of what makes the sniper game, and pushing other junk in. It won't be the sniper game anymore.
What makes the sniper game the Sniper Game in your opinion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:15 am
DeGei Dukes DeGei Dukes DeGei KingShoy Capcom has done the same thing with Megaman. They're going on 25 Years. Sega is still using Sonic. Nintendo has Mario. If you've got a winning formula, why change it? That's like taking Christmas and saying: "Sorry, No more Jesus or Santa. We give you, TURBO TERMINATOR X. For Christmas, you no longer give gifts to each other, you buy them to sediate yourself for annihlation. :3" With that attitude, we wouldnt have Mario 64, Sonic&Knuckles, or that Megaman game with Tron Bonne. Which also could lead to no Super Smash brothers as taking the characters out of the original games would be blasphemy in your scenario. Changing things can be good as long as the basics are true to the original, Im not making Shadow the Hedgehog out of the original Sonic here, Im making Ocarina of Time out of the original Legend of Zelda.
No... you're really much more making Shadow out of Sonic than Ocarina out of Zelda. You're DRASTICALLY changing things, same as Shadow did with the Sonic franchise.
Shadow changed the feel of the game from a speed platformer, to a shooter. Ocarina took Zelda basics and expanded into a 3D world. Im not entirely remaking the Sniper game, Im working with the basics and mixing and matching them to a new setup and adding in natural expansions to that.
No.. you're taking the idea of a game with a killer and people finding the killers, that' it, tossing out the rest of what makes the sniper game, and pushing other junk in. It won't be the sniper game anymore.
What makes the sniper game the Sniper Game in your opinion? I know you're asking Dukes, but I'm answering too. What makes the Sniper Game, the sniper game? The fact that it's Gaia related in almost every aspect. We have a Sniper, who snipes, but of course. We have a G-Team, note: Logan, Edmund, Leon. We have Newsreporter, we have the GCDers, which this came from, and a Jail. It's not based off some shitty anime we like to watch on Toonami, or game we played last thursday. It's about what 70% of this forum sits down infront of their computer on this very website for at least 3 hours a day, and hangs out with the people they know at. Almost everyone knows the plot to this website, so there's no confusion, there's no way to get misled. The game simply is what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
