|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:57 pm
well, i can't help it. I'm a redneck and that's just who i am. and i eat things that city folks usually won't eat. like frog leggs, squirrel, snake, ect. i like the taste of of all of these, and you can't say you don't like, if you havn't tried it. really, it's very good.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:47 pm
I'm not city folk.. And I refuse to eat something I've had as a pet before. Its just not right in my mind at all.
I got laws now...
1. In Miami, it is forbidden to imitate an animal.
2. In Illinois, the law is that a car must be driven with the steering wheel.
3. In West Virginia, only babies can ride in a baby carriage.
4. In Texas, it's against the law for anyone to have a pair of pliers in his or her possession.
5. It is against the law to mispronounce the name of the State of Arkansas in that State.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 1:08 am
XeniaSierra I'm not city folk.. And I refuse to eat something I've had as a pet before. Its just not right in my mind at all.
I got laws now...
1. In Miami, it is forbidden to imitate an animal.
2. In Illinois, the law is that a car must be driven with the steering wheel.
3. In West Virginia, only babies can ride in a baby carriage.
4. In Texas, it's against the law for anyone to have a pair of pliers in his or her possession.
5. It is against the law to mispronounce the name of the State of Arkansas in that State. Lmao, I love it. I like the first one, but what about a dress up party if someone dressed up as a chicken?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:38 am
Tehehe I know. But I probably wouldn't liek it any way as I would be like ewww im eating frogs legs. ANd some how make myself think it tastes sick. I've done that to food before.
Tehehe if someone dressed up as a chicken you would find alod of children runing in the oppisit direction
xD
Tehehe. Most kids are scared of chicken
^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
Littlemissdevil Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 5:58 am
Kids are afraid of chicken? eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:43 am
Most of them. When I was on work experiecne at a zoo. All the little kids that came through the gates between 1-5, cried / ran away / screamed or stood frozen on the spot at the chickens. I was forever chasing them away so kids could go down the path and catch up with their parents.
xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
Littlemissdevil Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:13 am
i gorgot what state it was but you need a liscense to wear high heels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:45 am
Lets see..
In many primitive societies (American Natives, Africans, etc.) it was (if not still is) common practice to delicately mold and shape the heads of newborns immediately after birth, generally into egg or box shapes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:18 pm
Won't that kill the baby?
and why would anybody be afraid of a chicken? they are awesome!
And no, when you chop off their head, they do not run around, they just jump and do flips in the air a bunch of times.
XeniaSierra- If you think about it, people who raise live stock, kill and eat the animals, and technically, they are their pets. So it's not just me and there's nothing wrong with it. People (like me) raise chickens as pets and kill and eat them. what's wrong with that? I also raise sheep and eat them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:24 am
scarthman Won't that kill the baby? Hmmm. confused You would think so. But I guess they got good at it or something. A baby's head is very flexible at birth for obvious reasons, so you could concievably mold it as long as you were gentle about it. Although I'm sure a lot of people messed up, anyway. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:31 am
Crownflame scarthman Won't that kill the baby? Hmmm. confused You would think so. But I guess they got good at it or something. A baby's head is very flexible at birth for obvious reasons, so you could concievably mold it as long as you were gentle about it. Although I'm sure a lot of people messed up, anyway. XD but isn't that called child abuse? i mean, if you mess up, the kid could be a retard for the rest of it's life, or possible die like i said earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:12 am
O.o
Head forming ... eck. Wat wouldnt the head grown out of that shape anyway ? As the dna has made liek everything to fit the body. SO the head would slowly go back to how it was ment to be. But yes it could harm the child scarth. ANd Im sure many children die from it. As that is stil very dangerous to do even though babies bones are more flexable. Mainly becuase you have more when you are younger. For growth and such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Littlemissdevil Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:45 am
Well, a baby's body is mainly cartilige because it tends to get squeezed on its way out of the birth canal. But, I'm sure it wasn't called child abuse in primitive cultures... I mean, Natives left their kids out in the snow so that they could learn survival techniques, and other questionable things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:32 pm
Please stop arguing or 'debating' about what you think is personally right or wrong. This is a fact thread, not an argue or 'debate' thread.
I don't think it's child abuse. Not in primitive cultures, a least. I'm not sure if it's okay in the year 2006, but I don't think it could classify as child abuse =o~ But that is weird. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Littlemissdevil Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:53 pm
xD
Hehehe sorry. I was bored. ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
