|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:22 pm
Here's the sig, in it's entirety, since things were taken out of context, in this thread.
Enjoy.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 9:52 pm
Unfortunately, it doesn't change the fact that forcing women to chose option A is no better than society forcing women to chose option B.
Nice as your sentiments may be, they are entirely misguided. You aren't freeing women. You are merely substituting one form of opression for another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:37 am
Mcphee Here's the sig, in it's entirety, since things were taken out of context, in this thread.
Enjoy.
But thanks for posting it. You've saved me going through someone's randosig and their vomit inducing anti-choice banners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:05 am
"Women don't have testicles, so why should men?"
In all honesty, the "men don't get abortions" claim is complete and utter bullshit. Anybody else up for tracking down the people who say that, marching over to their houses, slapping them upon the head with a wet noodle while shouting, "No s**t, Sherlock Holmes!" into their faces?
As you can tell, I have issues with the human race.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:50 am
The sig is composed entirely of emotional appeals. It's a vortex of fallacies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:42 pm
Eshmasesh The sig is composed entirely of emotional appeals. It's a vortex of fallacies.
Pro-life is about HUMAN life, not antibacterial life.
And emotional appeals? "She could have been raped!" is as emotional an appeal as anything in that signature.
You guys want to talk about signatures, and what's what, take a look at your own signatures, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:23 pm
Men don't have to go through nine months of pregnancy and hours of childbirth. So why should women?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:28 pm
Mcphee
Pro-life is about HUMAN life, not antibacterial life.
So, you're saying that Pro-life is only about humans, even though we are actually animals with an overinflated ego?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:31 pm
Yi Min Men don't have to go through nine months of pregnancy and hours of childbirth. So why should women? Seconded. And, to add to that, they do not need to radically change their daily lifestyles when they become expecting fathers, so why should women?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:22 pm
Asexual-Slut~Enya Yi Min Men don't have to go through nine months of pregnancy and hours of childbirth. So why should women? Seconded. And, to add to that, they do not need to radically change their daily lifestyles when they become expecting fathers, so why should women?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:29 pm
MipsyKitten Asexual-Slut~Enya Yi Min Men don't have to go through nine months of pregnancy and hours of childbirth. So why should women? Seconded. And, to add to that, they do not need to radically change their daily lifestyles when they become expecting fathers, so why should women? I second that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 9:14 pm
MipsyKitten Asexual-Slut~Enya Yi Min Men don't have to go through nine months of pregnancy and hours of childbirth. So why should women? Seconded. And, to add to that, they do not need to radically change their daily lifestyles when they become expecting fathers, so why should women? Yay. I am loved. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:16 am
MipsyKitten Mcphee Here's the sig, in it's entirety, since things were taken out of context, in this thread.
Enjoy.
But thanks for posting it. You've saved me going through someone's randosig and their vomit inducing anti-choice banners. This banner pissed me off. So I used the awesome power of The Gimp, and made a reply.  I don't get this idea some Pro-Lifers have that women who get abortions are forced to do so. Is it because they believe that no woman would choose to kill a fetus?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:37 am
Asexual-Slut~Enya Yi Min Men don't have to go through nine months of pregnancy and hours of childbirth. So why should women? Seconded. And, to add to that, they do not need to radically change their daily lifestyles when they become expecting fathers, so why should women? Men aren't expected to just not ******** unless they don't want their uterus filled wiht baby; Why should women be? I have a C&P I got from someone: But what I really wanted to ask these people, the ones who were insisting that if a woman didn't want a baby she should just keep her panties pulled up, was this: What would you do if you fell for this girl and she told you, "I'm sorry, I can't ever have sex with you. I don't want a baby." Does anyone really think they'd just accept that and say, "Sure honey, I can live without sex."? ******** NO! They wouldn't! They'd try to convince her it would be okay, they can use protection, look, I have condoms AND birth control pills, AND you can get the morning after pill (never mind that America seems set to allow pharmacists full right to refuse to sell it), and if she still said, no, birth control can fail and I really don't want a baby, they'd DUMP HER. Why is it always "keep your panties up" and not "keep your c**k in your own pants instead of in her v****a, dickwad"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:46 am
Forcing someone to choose option A because society might be forcing her to choose option B does NOT solve the problem. All it does is substitute one problem for another, one that is equally bad.
If McPhee, or the creator of the signature, really gave two shits about women, they should realize this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
