|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 4:14 pm
Ciel Avec Cafeine Your wording strongly implied that humans were intended to eat meat. "Intended" meaning that something/something intended us to eat meat. Basing an argument on this unknown "something" is ridiculous, which is my problem with your wording. Get it yet? You make it out as you want to, I never implied anything. Get it yet? rolleyes Ciel Avec Cafeine "Can't handle" massive amounts of flesh? No, of course not! NO ONE is saying that! A "balanced non-vegetarian" diet does NOT mean "eating massive amounts of meat". You do not have to be vegetarian to be healthy. Yes, if you can manage a balanced vegetarian diet, it's great for your health. No one is denying that. But meat in moderation is not an automatic death sentence. Yes, they are actually. Thats what I'm debating over. People on this thread are talking about meat eating being natural, and feral humans in the wild being able to survive on it. Your body cannot process raw meat like it can raw fruits vegetables, thats what I'm arguing. If you were to do a completly natural raw, no cooking, no preparation, living in the wild diet (I'm sure there's going to be a bunch of you swarming with 'Well we could cook it!' comments now, which isn't the point.) you woudn't be able to live on raw meat, you'd have to forage and live on fruits and veggies and resort to meat eating only when other foods aren't available. If you can't take the time to read what I said instead of attempting to put words in my mouth "that's your problem".Ciel Avec Cafeine If you want to deny the fact that non-vegetarians have lived to be over 100, or that there are plenty of non-vegetarians that are healthy, well, that's your problem. Again, I never mentioned or commented on the 'living to be over 100' crap, you did.
I'm done with this topic now, feel free to rant all you want.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 10:43 am
Quote: If you truly believe you can survive in the wild with raw meat as a staple of your diet by all means test your theory and prove me wrong. I talk about comparing diets because the fact that vegs function better in general should tell you they're doing something right. Some people seem to be forgetting that this was the better part of human evolution rolleyes The fact that nearly every society, no matter where placed upon the globe, has had meat to be a primary source of nutrients in their diet seems to indicate as such. The only societies which don't traditionally eat meat are those which have religious social constructs banning meat. However, I challenge your claim that the vegetarian diet is healthier. Back it up, Soy Boy. Quote: ILol... what the hell are you on about? I have to be some Olympic wanna-be because I'd rather eat a handful of broccoli then a 10lb chunk of dead cow? So you've given up arguing with human anatomy and comparing the diets themselves that you want to say that all veggies are health nuts? Cause last time I turned on the TV I didn't see vegetarian or vegan products being advertised to people, I see new low carb s**t, low fat meats, chicken fruit salads, etc etc... Crap for meaties that supposedly care about their fitness. People make the choice to go veg for any number of reasons, to clump us all up as health fanatics is just bs. "Olympic wanna-be" =/= "tend to lead healthier lifestyles." Fallacy of the false dichotomy; strawman fallacy. Fact: I haven't given up arguing human "anatomy" (I'd imagine that you mean biology, but that's okay). I have pointed out a logical fallacy in your thinking, that being the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. "Vegetarians tend to be healthier than omnivorous humans, therefore the vegetarian diet is healthier than an omnivorous diet." Such a conclusion fails to look at other trends in the vegetarian movement and their effects on health. Quote: No problem, anytime you feel like spouting garbage as if you've proven something that's obviously crap feel free to look me up. At best humans in the wild would only resort to meat eating when other foods weren't readily available, just like our relatives. I never once said the human body can't consume meat, I said it's not a staple. You guys are acting like you could go out and peel a dead animal off the road and chow down without any effect on you whatsoever, and that's ridiculous. And you want me to concede and say 'oh well sure, of course you could live on that' and I'm not... Most anthropoligists and real scientists are of the conviction that humans did much more hunting than they did gathering in the pre-agricultural era. Dead animals off the road are usually spotted during a state of decay, so the meat is not fresh. Plus, it's on the side of a freeway which is probably contaminated with germs. This is wildly different than hunting an animal and consuming it later on in that day. Quote: I'm done with this topic now, feel free to rant all you want. Translation: "My position has been rendered entirely unteneble, so to save face I'm not going to post in here anymore (though I'll read any new comments).
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:59 am
Yeah I agree with you with the whole post........I'm also tired of having this same argument with people!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:27 pm
Hum.... thats pretty interesting. Man, humans are so weird....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:39 pm
_SummerMystery_ Hum.... thats pretty interesting. Man, humans are so weird.... Yeah we really are, we are the only ones that spend our time on this earth arguing over what we should and should not eat. razz
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:22 pm
Quote: Eating meat has made humans blood-thirsty monsters, even turning on eachother. If people didn't kill animals, you can be sure they wouldn't have started killing eachother, either. At least that is my opinion.
I fight allll the timee, and i dont eat any meat.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:30 pm
We're omnivores.
1) In the case of our abilities to be able to digest certain things. The appendix used to secrete very powerful acids to aid the stomach in the digestion of raw meat. After we discovered fire there was no need for the appendix since the fire helped to break down the meat. The appendix became useless through time as people born with mutations that gave them mal-functioning appendixes were able to survive since fire was used. We now have cases where human beings are no longer born with appendixes. Therefore our bodies had the ability to digest raw meat at one point and still does with the help of fire since we've used it for so long.
2) Cavemen and cavewomen relied heavily upon veggies nearby, while the males hunted (which often resulted in no catch) The rest picked fruits and berries to prepare for food. Meat was a rarity, only until human kind began to hunt strategically with traps and such did meat become more common on their dinner plates. This is why we digest veggies better than meat, after eating a piece of steak you become a bit tired and want to just lie there. That's not the case with veggies. We've relied on veggies for a much longer time than meat. We can still consume meat but we do extremely well with just veggies. We were not "meant" to be either one, carnivore or herbivore, we developed as an omnivoric (don't even know if it's a real word) species but we lean heavily towards vegetarian because our bodies handle it better.
(I'm just going to go as far as i can, i'm really tired, i can tell some of my sentences are completey out of wack but whatever i'm tired but i want to write o__O)
3) We don't have nails, we don't have very strong mucles, not much of anything of speed, but we do have brains. We didn't evolve with any of the more common predator traits because we simply didn't need them. Our species, or rather the environment worked on our brains the most. We have society, working in numbers as an organized unit leads to better results than being solo. Our ability to set traps, break-up herds or scare them over a cliff to their deaths (which is what happened a lot) lead to a lot more food than sharp teeth and claws could have done. We are top predator because of our ability to organize and plan ahead a bit. We can communicate with language and we can shape things in our environment to meet our needs. Point: Only because an animal doesn't have sharp teeth, claws, strenght and speed doesn't mean it's not a predator.
4) It's healthiest to be vegan/vegetarian because of the was our bodies will handle the food. All the nutrients necesarry to thrive can be found in plants, the most argued about being protein can also be found in veggies. We have soy protein! Protein can be found in soy, beans, basically the whole legume family i think, small questities here and there in vegetables like lettuce and such (My eyes just want to strangle me right now @_@). BUT! The nutrients needed to just SURVIVE cannot be acquired in an only-meat diet! This one should be obvious so i won't get into to it. But the real fighting is on vegan/vegetarian versus omnivorism. Both are healthy and can lead to a life reahing and passing 100yrs. of age!, BUT studies have shown you're less likely to become sick if you're a veg person than if you included meat in your diet. You're also non likely to be affected by the avian flu or madcow disease obviously if you're not comsuming meat, there's that plus. And just to throw it in there what you call meat here in the U.S. isn't 100% meat. To let you think about it i'll just say meat doesn't stay good for months out in mother nature, makes you wonder what kind of stuff is put into that "meat". The effects of preservatives, artificial flavoring and coloriung and such aren't COMPLETELY known so i'd just rather be safe than sorry.
AGGGHHH, this is as afar as my brain will let me go, sorry if i wasn't even on the current discussion, i read ther first post and then just begain typing. XP
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:07 pm
the reason why humans have "semi-canine" teeth is because we are omnivores - allowing humans to be able to eat meat as well as plants... so I pretty much agree with what eyeless112987 said... ...DON'T pressure anyone into becoming a vegetarian - it's their own choice!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:39 pm
ScreamingVegan Soymilk_Gun humans are fruitivorous (eating mainly fruit) just like our ancestors our jaw is like that of other herbivours and not hinged for tearing flesh the acidity of our saliva and the strength of our stomach acid bear out the we are plant eaters if you really beleive in creationism the diet in the garden of eden was vegan (Gen 1:29 God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.) yeah, i definately agree with that. even though I'm an atheist, I've read the bible through and through and I'm convinced that if it was all true, "god" meant for humans to be vegans most definately. it's so funny because most christians (not trying to stereotype here, its just my experience) think it's like blasphemy not to eat meat. it's crazy. thanks for the extra facts! sorry, know this is an old post, but im agnostic so im not christian, in fact one of the reasons i hate the religion is for what im about to tell you. it states clearly that man was given dominion over the animals, states that jesus ate fish, has a list of the animals people ARE and arent allowed to eat. no, the bible condones it, which is one of the reasons i hate it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 9:55 pm
heres my take. evolution may take its course, and who knows, meat may have been necessary in the past. on the other hand, im tired of meat eaters claiming that they eat meat because its part of our evolution. our intelligence is part of our evolution as well. whether or not eating meat was necessary in the past has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not it is necessary now. vegeterianism is healthier, so dont tell me we were meant to eat meat because the human body reacts in a way that obviously shows that whether or not we were "meant" to eat it, we are healthier without it. i dont really care if we were or werent "meant" to do anything, and such a claim that we were or werent is irrational. we have the intelligence to balance our diets, and we have the resources to get our necessary vitamins and minerals from plants at a ready supply, so therefore the human mind and culture has evolved to a point where no there is no other right thing to do but denounce meat, whether or not weve needed it in the past, because we do NOT need it now. seems like a bit of a double wammy, all these meat eaters out there our sacrificing their own health in order to kill something. their killing an animal so it can in turn kill them... seems a bit pointless. people need to get out of the hole that theyve buried themselves in and open their eyes and realize that their want for their own selfish conveniences and luxuries is not enough and never will be enough to justify killing another living thing in order to obtain it
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:40 am
Just because that's what you believe doesn't justify it for everyone else. Here's a fact. Some people HAVE to eat meat. There is no way around it. I have been a vegetarian off and on several times for ethical and health reasons, and each time I had to quit because of severe chest pains. I eat meat again, and BAM no more chest pains. Coincedence, each and every single time? I think not. You say we don't "need" to eat meat any more based on what we're capable of doing now. Why is it, then, that many vegans and vegetarians need to take nutritional supplements to make up for the vitamins they're missing from not eating meat? Those who don't end up as skinny, non-physically fit, virtually no muscle-massed twigs. To have to take substitute pills and vitamins to make up for what we're lacking in meat is not a sign that we should be giving up meat. It's the natural way, whether you like it or not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:47 pm
Wow, I never knew all that. Ya learn somethin' new every day. From what I've read, it does seem as though we weren't meant to eat meat, but then again there could be evidence that I haven't learned yet that proves the opposite, so I'll just say that I have no opinion at the moment, but given the information I find it hard to believe that there is any evidence strong enough to prove that humans were supposed to eat meat. Perhaps the human body has evolved a bit in order to use meat as a resource for nutrition, since it can work the opposite way and make it impossible to eat meat without gettin' sick. So whether we were supposed to or not, the majority did.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:45 pm
A person who chooses to exclude meat from their diet will still survive no problem. A person who ONLY eats meat will end up dying. Humans aren't designed to eat meat...if we were, than we could be like them lions and tigers who eat other animals. We aren't carnivores. Humans aren't even anatomically suited to be omnivores, let alone carnivors. Humans are suppose to be herbivores.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:12 pm
Ghost of Ailinea Just because that's what you believe doesn't justify it for everyone else. Here's a fact. Some people HAVE to eat meat. There is no way around it. I have been a vegetarian off and on several times for ethical and health reasons, and each time I had to quit because of severe chest pains. I eat meat again, and BAM no more chest pains. Coincedence, each and every single time? I think not. You say we don't "need" to eat meat any more based on what we're capable of doing now. Why is it, then, that many vegans and vegetarians need to take nutritional supplements to make up for the vitamins they're missing from not eating meat? Those who don't end up as skinny, non-physically fit, virtually no muscle-massed twigs. To have to take substitute pills and vitamins to make up for what we're lacking in meat is not a sign that we should be giving up meat. It's the natural way, whether you like it or not. Here's the fact, NOBODY does. That's funny, I've never heard anywhere about a meatless diet causing chest pains. In fact, I can't even see how that is scientifically possible. Yes, we don't need to eat meat now. Of course vegans need to take supplements, but as a lacto-ovo vegetarian I'm getting everything I need. Even IF I had to take nutritional supplements, again, I don't care. It's annoying, I hear all these people argue that because humans have always eaten meat it is a rational justification for why we eat it now. I see no difference between that and this, and honestly the evolutionary argument is completely irrational. Anyway, even if nutritional supplements were required, WE HAVE THEM. It's called progression. This in itself is somewhat a result of human evolution due to the fact that we haven't always had them, and in order to get them our intelligence first had to grow. I don't need supplements, at a recent doctor's appointment my protein and iron levels came out completely normal. I don't care about all these evolutionary facts about meat. My mindset is simply this: what's best for the world, why is it best, and can we do it? You may not think it's possible for everyone to be healthy as a vegetarian, but science sure as hell does. Yes, it may be harder for some, like some people aren't good iron absorbers, others may have a larger demand for protein. It doesn't matter, with today's technology it can be done. Anyway, it's 1:15 A.M. where I am now, read my rant in my journal if you actually care to see anything else. ( http://www.gaiaonline.com/journal/?mode=view&post_id=13206967 )
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|