Welcome to Gaia! ::

Loving Kindness: A Buddhism Guild

Back to Guilds

A Buddhism Guild for all Gaians, Buddhist or not 

Tags: buddhism, philosophy, religion, dharma, health 

Reply Loving Kindness: A Buddhism Guild
The Different Disciplines (Sects) Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Starlight Orchid

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 6:10 pm


WOW, this is so helpful. Thank you guys!
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 10:39 pm


Harry Parachute
This turned out a lot longer than I anticipated, but it’s still rushed. I’ll edit the stuff later, I’m sure.

Theravada, Sanskrit for "Way of the Elders" I think.

The first form of Buddhism. They stick to the fundamentals, straight tripitika and dhammapada as previously mentioned, but I’m pretty sure they also have a few post-canonical sutras. Their goal is to reach a state of perfect peace where both aversion and desire are extinguished and they escape the cycle of death and rebirth. A person in such a state becomes an "Arhat".

Mahayana, Sanskrit for "Greater Vehicle".

Again as previously mentioned, where the defining characteristic of Theravada is one of wisdom, the mission statement of Mahayana is one of compassion. The goal is not just to become enlightened, but to be your own full and complete Buddha, to stay involved in the world and help others achieve enlightenment as a Bodhisattva. Many Mahayana practitioners point to the Buddha's dying words of (paraphrasing, maybe) "Become a lamp unto yourself" as a message to advance beyond the core teachings.

Theravada practitioners don't consider this heresy. They even consider the goal of becoming a Bodhisattva more noble than simple self-enlightenemt and that it could be achieveable. However, they state that only a few need to take this route. Also, the best way to lead others to peace is through example more than anything else.

A very important concept of Mahayana Buddhism is "upaya". A sanskrit word often translated as "skillful means", sometimes "liberative technique". Basically, it means that the five basic precepts, depending on the situation, can be broken if it's done in the name of compassion or with aim to create Bodhicitta, a state of mind where the target can develop thought conducive to enlightenment.

I think one of the key Sutras in Mahayana might be found in a section of the Lotus Sutra. A Bodhisattva (or was it the Buddha? I forget) was passing a burning house and saw children inside, playing, oblivious to the flames. He knew that if he told them there was a fire, there was a chance they wouldn't believe him. Instead, he said he had wonderful toys for them to play with. They immediately rushed out before the flames took the house down.

Clearly it's False Speech, but the ends justified the means. Theravada would probably excuse this breach of conduct, but are in general much less lenient. There’s a parable about a monk who, for some reason, had to break one precept. He chose to get drunk. When he was sleeping in a barn a goat woke him up, so he killed it, breaking the precept of ahimsa, or non-violence, then went and had sex with the daughter of his lodger, breaking the third precept concerning improper sexual relations, and so on.

Zen Buddhism.

Off-shoot of Mahayana, way I understand the origins in China with Ch'an Buddhism was a mix of Mahayana Buddhism and Taoism. The difference between Zen and standard Mahayana lies in what might be understood as, to draw a analogy to Christianity, Original Sin.

Most Buddhists believe that as they practice the doctrines of Buddhism and generate fruitful karma they build themselves up, spiritually, until they achieve nirvana. In their natural state, human beings are entirely entwined in samsara, the illusiory world.

In Zen Buddhism, you are already a Buddha underneath all the programming the world's wrapped you up in. You just don't know it yet. Practicing Buddhism through Zen is about revealing yourself (or lack of self, rather). This comes from the idea of the Tao, of inherent naturalness that gets smothered by societal norms, ideologies, language, and even senses and feelings.

Comes from Ch'an, or "Meditation" Buddhism in China, brought there from India by a prince named Bodhidharma. They focus less on Sutras and scriptures and more on, yep, meditation and what they call "mind-to-mind transmission" of doctrine from teacher to student.

Now, I'm not too sure if the two forms of Ch'an Buddhism, Northern and Southern, correlate respectively to Soto and Rinzai Zen Buddhism in Japan or if Soto and Rinzai Zen both come from Southern Ch'an Buddhism exclusively (I know Southern Ch'an became dominant over time since the split of Ch'an around the 730's), but I'll go ahead and see if I can talk about the different groups regardless of their origins.

Northern Ch'an Buddhism's a gradual enlightenment bunch. Slowly over time through self-reflection you achieve the goal of enlightenment. This is similar to Soto Zen, where Meditation or "Zazen" is a key practice.

Southern Ch'an Buddhism's about sudden enlightenment, or satori (Japanese term, dunno the Chinese for it). It focuses on mental and physical strain and discomfort to dislodge the ego or reveal the paradox and dependent causation of the physical world. This is where “kung-an” or, in Japanese, “koan” comes from. They serve as a verbal exercise that reveals the limitations of language and thought.

(I’m not sure if the Samurai were more based in Rinzai Zen or in Tendai Buddhism, the latter of which is a form of Mahayana Buddhism based almost solely on the Lotus Sutra and various interpretations of it by the founders and teachers. Lotus Sutra has a lot to do with the concept of Dependent Causation, which has to deal with how things, in being completely dependent and interconnected, are inherently empty and without essence. Very similar to Zen, actually.)

Pure Land (Ching-t’u)Buddhism

Where Ch’an and Zen was the form of Buddhism that intellectuals and monks took up, the lay people by and large followed this form. Not too dissimilar from Christianity, it talks about enlightenment only being attainable through complete surrender to the Buddha of Salvation or Light, known as Amitabha or Amita Buddha. Core sutra’s the Pure Land Scripture, but one can go to Heaven, the Buddha-world to the far west, simply by reciting the name of the Amita Buddha over and over. Reason why things are so simple in this religion has to do with the belief that teachings degenerate over time. Pure Land Buddhists believe humans and the teachings of the Buddha have degenerated so much by now that enlightenment is only attainable through grace and surrender.

Vajrayana Buddhism, Sanskrit for “Diamond Vehicle” or “Vehicle of the Thunderbolt”
Also Tantric Buddhism.

Imagine the three different big schools of Buddhism as three different plans for a person on one tall building’s rooftop to get on the rooftop of an adjacent tall building.

The Theravada Buddhist would say the best thing to do is take the stairs down, walk across the street, and climb the stairs up.

The Mahayana Buddhist would say the best thing to do is take the elevator down, walk across the street, and take the elevator up.

The Vajrayana Buddhist would say the best thing to do is back up, get a good running start, and jump from one rooftop to the other. Just make sure not to miss…

Basically, Vajrayana Buddhism considers itself the quickest and most dangerous path to nirvana. It places a very, very high value in the relationship between the teacher and the student. The student offers the teacher “body, speech and mind” in exchange for tutelage. After that, the student has to do whatever the teacher says. If the teacher says to eat fish guts, live in a hole, or even to chop off a finger, the student has to do it. The Story of Milarepa is a good book to read concerning this kind of relationship.

Tantra’s part of both Hindu and Buddhist teachings, but I’m not sure if the terminology of Right-handed and Left-handed or White and Red Tantra apply to Buddhism, or just to Hinduism. I’ll talk about them anyway.

Right-handed or White Tantra is the more mainstream of the two. Idea behind it boils down to viewing all things as unification between male and female, light and dark, that everything is a symbolic act of achieving a sort of monistic universality. In Hindu Tantric practices this relates to the kundaleen, where perfect posture and breathing opens up the charkas along your spine to allow Siva to move up your body to your mind, where Sakti waits. When they meet, it’s symbolic of the cosmos, in male and female form, entwining in your body and your being an internalization of all that is.

Left-handed or Red Tantra takes things a bit further. Their credo is “Turn and Face the Monster”. That means do inappropriate things and face the horrible side of yourself to see that there is, in fact, no duality between good and bad, there is only what is. (Or what isn’t. The largest difference between Hindu and Buddhist thought has to deal with whether the world is all secretly one-thing, “Atman”, or no-thing, “Sunyasa”) This is why the Tantric holy man will go into the graveyard and eat the left-over bones of cremated people to sanctify it. Other people would be ostracized for defiling himself and the procession during a funeral, but the Tantric lies outside of pure and impure, so he gets away with it. This idea of the illusiory seperate parts coming together to form the true union and oneness is also where all that sex-stuff comes into play.

(Most Tantric teachers don’t let Westerners practice this form of Tantra, mainly because we’ve been raised in a society that focuses on the form of the person, rather than the person him or herself, thereby not allowing us to connect with anything beyond the aggregates or gunas.)

Offshoot of this in Japan’s called Shingon. Don’t know too much about it. Was a rival of the Tendai school. The Tendai school was very austere and very ascetic where the Shingon school's very esoteric. Mostly appealed to artists and court nobility.

Tibetan Buddhism is a form of Vajrayana Buddhism that has at its root the Sand Mandala, where they symbolically create the Kalachakra (translated as both “Wheel of Time” and “Wheel of Death”) and then destroy it.

The reason why Vajrayana Buddhism is viewed as dangerous has to deal with the concern that you’ll mistake the means for the end. When you cross a river with a boat, you don’t then try to carry the boat on your back. This can become very destructive when the means involve sex, violence, anger, dazzling idols, and the like, and those things can be a big part of this school.

I’m burnt out. Hope this is helpful.

Edited a little.


i know i am late in the game, buti loved this so much that i postponed replying to an important message to read it end to end. i also wish to share it in my guild for discussion. smile you have single-handedly rekindled my desire to explore Buddhism. i have been finding myself attracted again to Zen more and more lately...

Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200

Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:18 pm


now, i have a friend who says he follows a Buddhist school which doesn't believe in attaining Budhism, but rather follows a philosophical lifestyle based on the teachings put into practical form. they have no real belief in Samsara and Reincarnation. i am a bit confused, and would like to know more about this school of thought, such as what it's called.
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 11:05 pm


Chieftain Twilight
now, i have a friend who says he follows a Buddhist school which doesn't believe in attaining Budhism, but rather follows a philosophical lifestyle based on the teachings put into practical form. they have no real belief in Samsara and Reincarnation. i am a bit confused, and would like to know more about this school of thought, such as what it's called.


It's called the "Ignoring Things the Buddha Taught Because I Find Them Inconvenient" School. It is primarily practiced by new Western converts who also subscribe to the "We Don't Need No Stinking Teachers" tradition. Generally, these followers find greener pastures in some other religion or pastime pretty quickly. wink

davidm843


Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:02 am


davidm843
Chieftain Twilight
now, i have a friend who says he follows a Buddhist school which doesn't believe in attaining Budhism, but rather follows a philosophical lifestyle based on the teachings put into practical form. they have no real belief in Samsara and Reincarnation. i am a bit confused, and would like to know more about this school of thought, such as what it's called.


It's called the "Ignoring Things the Buddha Taught Because I Find Them Inconvenient" School. It is primarily practiced by new Western converts who also subscribe to the "We Don't Need No Stinking Teachers" tradition. Generally, these followers find greener pastures in some other religion or pastime pretty quickly. wink


wow. confused this is the second time in a row i have read very harshly judgemental self-righteous statements from you, and it bothers me. look, just because it's different doesn't mean it's ignorant. as i said, they believe in the Buddha's scriptures, they just see it through an atheistic lense. and there is no "lack of need of teachers", they still listen to a Buddhist Master of that sect, and they still read the Sutras, and they still consider the Buddha's Teachings and contemplate what they mean. please, listen to what is being said, and try to see things from more than one point of view. do not judge so harshly.
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:50 am


Chieftain Twilight
now, i have a friend who says he follows a Buddhist school which doesn't believe in attaining Budhism, but rather follows a philosophical lifestyle based on the teachings put into practical form. they have no real belief in Samsara and Reincarnation. i am a bit confused, and would like to know more about this school of thought, such as what it's called.
You know, I have no idea what that school is. You might want to ask your friend.

Cranium Squirrel
Captain

Friendly Trickster


Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:34 am


Byaggha
Chieftain Twilight
now, i have a friend who says he follows a Buddhist school which doesn't believe in attaining Budhism, but rather follows a philosophical lifestyle based on the teachings put into practical form. they have no real belief in Samsara and Reincarnation. i am a bit confused, and would like to know more about this school of thought, such as what it's called.
You know, I have no idea what that school is. You might want to ask your friend.

hm... alright, i'll squeeze some more info out of him. xd he realy seems to be my best source of info on it anyway.

just thought i'd share it with you guys, cause it sounded intriguing. smile thought you might wanna hear about it to, and that maybe any of you already had and would be willing to tell me more about it.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:25 am


Chieftain Twilight
hm... alright, i'll squeeze some more info out of him. xd he realy seems to be my best source of info on it anyway.

just thought i'd share it with you guys, cause it sounded intriguing. smile thought you might wanna hear about it to, and that maybe any of you already had and would be willing to tell me more about it.
Sounds a bit like overapplication of the kalama sutra, right on into Buddhism sans esoterica. biggrin No idea if it qualifies as an actual school of yet, but that's what I'm getting from it.

Cranium Squirrel
Captain

Friendly Trickster


Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:17 am


Byaggha
Chieftain Twilight
hm... alright, i'll squeeze some more info out of him. xd he realy seems to be my best source of info on it anyway.

just thought i'd share it with you guys, cause it sounded intriguing. smile thought you might wanna hear about it to, and that maybe any of you already had and would be willing to tell me more about it.
Sounds a bit like overapplication of the kalama sutra, right on into Buddhism sans esoterica. biggrin No idea if it qualifies as an actual school of yet, but that's what I'm getting from it.


huh. i guess that would make sense. can you link me to those things?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 7:28 am


Chieftain Twilight
huh. i guess that would make sense. can you link me to those things?
I can link you to the kalama sutra (which is sometimes called the Buddha's charter of free inquiry)...not so much on Buddhism sans esoterica. It's not something I kept in my linklist. One sec.

Here you go.

Oh wait, I may have something from atheist writer Sam Harris on this idea: Killing the Buddha.

Cranium Squirrel
Captain

Friendly Trickster


Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 8:14 am


Byaggha
Chieftain Twilight
huh. i guess that would make sense. can you link me to those things?
I can link you to the kalama sutra (which is sometimes called the Buddha's charter of free inquiry)...not so much on Buddhism sans esoterica. It's not something I kept in my linklist. One sec.

Here you go.

Oh wait, I may have something from atheist writer Sam Harris on this idea: Killing the Buddha.


ooh, thank you dear. ^.^
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:00 am


Chieftain Twilight
now, i have a friend who says he follows a Buddhist school which doesn't believe in attaining Budhism, but rather follows a philosophical lifestyle based on the teachings put into practical form. they have no real belief in Samsara and Reincarnation. i am a bit confused, and would like to know more about this school of thought, such as what it's called.


The concepts of samsara and rebirth are integral teachings of Buddhism. Without them, the rest of the teachings fail to make sense. It's pretty much like a Christian saying he doesn't believe in Jesus or God.

Some people confuse meditation with Buddhism. One doesn't have to be Buddhist to meditate. Some people claim to be Buddhist because they think it's cool, or they are trying to be different. One doesn't HAVE to subscribe to any set of beliefs in Buddhism, but it really doesn't make any sense to call one self a Buddhist, but reject the teachings.

davidm843


Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:06 am


davidm843
Chieftain Twilight
now, i have a friend who says he follows a Buddhist school which doesn't believe in attaining Budhism, but rather follows a philosophical lifestyle based on the teachings put into practical form. they have no real belief in Samsara and Reincarnation. i am a bit confused, and would like to know more about this school of thought, such as what it's called.


The concepts of samsara and rebirth are integral teachings of Buddhism. Without them, the rest of the teachings fail to make sense. It's pretty much like a Christian saying he doesn't believe in Jesus or God.

Some people confuse meditation with Buddhism. One doesn't have to be Buddhist to meditate. Some people claim to be Buddhist because they think it's cool, or they are trying to be different. One doesn't HAVE to subscribe to any set of beliefs in Buddhism, but it really doesn't make any sense to call one self a Buddhist, but reject the teachings.


well, as i said, i'm not even clea on what exactly it is. he says it's Buddhism, but not realy. i'll just have to find out more about it, but i can't realy discuss the topic of this sect because i don't know anything about it. xp
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 9:59 am


well, he says it's call Ni'Chiren Buddhism.

apperrantly he says that
Quote:
please, listen to what is being said, and try to see things from more than one point of view. do not judge so harshly.
is about the summary of it. to basically listen and learn, to learn from the faults of others, to learn to learn. the idea behind it is to read your own inner enlightenment and reach revelations of yourself.

Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200

Cranium Squirrel
Captain

Friendly Trickster

PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 11:14 am


Ah, the Lotus Sutra kids. Not a fan of the sutra as a writing myself, despite my occasional Mahayana leanings, just because it tends to discard...like, most of the older teachings based on the fact that they are old, and according to the sutra, they're unneeded.

From what I've seen, the practice they're with is a very stripped down Buddhism on the whole - there's a belief among the sect that claims all you need to do to accrue good merit is chant the name of the Lotus Sutra over and over. Not really sure how that works, but I've been told it's a focuser.

More power to your friend if it's working for him, but it ain't my personal cup. 3nodding

Here's their website.
Reply
Loving Kindness: A Buddhism Guild

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum