|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:10 pm
I must have scared her away...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:13 pm
Thank God. It's, like, Four in the morning here. And this is the second night running I have been in a discussion like this. I'm going book shopping tomorrow and need some beauty sleep but shall not show mercy. That, and I am really enjoying this. She has good grammar, but a twisted view on men and women.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:20 pm
I think that she's still living under the blanket of naivete... There's no way that somebody who's lived in the real world for even three years could hide themselves from a few very simple truths... You have a good night.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:22 pm
I will, don't you worry. I hope I see you around here more. You rock. G'night.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:49 pm
Wow. I've been reading through this and Chipmunk is basically the only one who makes sense, and I'm not just saying that because she's my buddy. And for your information, you didn't scare her off. She has something called a life, and you should check into getting one. And ma’am, you're basically saying that prostitution is okay and should always be okay, but you'd destroy your man if he ever did it. And don't you know that it's a sin to commit adultery? God made someone for everyone, and that can be easily screwed up when an idiot wants to do some random stranger just for the heck of it. It can really hurt people, and you should understand that, so why don't you? And considering your posts started getting shorter and making less sense each time, it's very clear that Chipmunk is winning this thing and you're probably just a prostitute yourself trying to make it legal so that you basically aren't doing anything bad, or should I say “illegal”? Although there is the possibility that you aren't I wouldn't know, considering I don't know you. Prostitution is bad, and that's that. Now what about the men who aren't in a committed relationship? They could save money by just buying a sex toy. It's ready whenever they want it, and they'd save money on possible condoms and also wouldn't have to buy woman after woman. Now if a married man bought one, it would make his wife feel like she was being replaced with a doll. Being in love doesn't mean sex 24/7, and sex should only be for pleasure when the two are either happily married or have lived together for x amount of years. Sex is for people truly in love, not for people who want to womanize. And before you ask, yes, I am indeed Catholic and I'm proud of it. If I have to go all “crazy catholic” on dingbats like you, I will. Sorry if I sounded like a total jerk face there, but I'm just trying to help make an important point, and I seriously am apologizing because I don't like to be mean.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:56 pm
redpandalvr99 Wow. I've been reading through this and Chipmunk is basically the only one who makes sense, and I'm not just saying that because she's my buddy. And for your information, you didn't scare her off. She has something called a life, and you should check into getting one. And ma’am, you're basically saying that prostitution is okay and should always be okay, but you'd destroy your man if he ever did it. And don't you know that it's a sin to commit adultery? God made someone for everyone, and that can be easily screwed up when an idiot wants to do some random stranger just for the heck of it. It can really hurt people, and you should understand that, so why don't you? And considering your posts started getting shorter and making less sense each time, it's very clear that Chipmunk is winning this thing and you're probably just a prostitute yourself trying to make it legal so that you basically aren't doing anything bad, or should I say “illegal”? Although there is the possibility that you aren't I wouldn't know, considering I don't know you. Prostitution is bad, and that's that. Now what about the men who aren't in a committed relationship? They could save money by just buying a sex toy. It's ready whenever they want it, and they'd save money on possible condoms and also wouldn't have to buy woman after woman. Now if a married man bought one, it would make his wife feel like she was being replaced with a doll. Being in love doesn't mean sex 24/7, and sex should only be for pleasure when the two are either happily married or have lived together for x amount of years. Sex is for people truly in love, not for people who want to womanize. And before you ask, yes, I am indeed Catholic and I'm proud of it. If I have to go all “crazy catholic” on dingbats like you, I will. Sorry if I sounded like a total jerk face there, but I'm just trying to help make an important point, and I seriously am apologizing because I don't like to be mean. So, you're telling me that everything I said (which I have researched on my own) makes no sense to you whatsoever, even though I picked her post apart and answered it section by section? My posts got longer as they went on, which clearly means I know what I'm talking about. I'm not for prostitution, whether it's legal or not, but the government could definitely make a lot of money off of it should they decide to ever make legal. The same goes for marijuana (but no hard drugs - meth, cocaine, crack, etc). The reason that they don't do it is because there would be such a backlash from all the different hedge funds and special interest groups. They want the poor right where they can keep them, in prison. If you want to believe in God and Catholicism, be my guest, I won't stop you, but don't bring a religious argument to a debate that clearly is not religious.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:58 pm
P.S. I have a life, it's called school and work. Right now is my downtime, thank you very much.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:14 pm
Yet another person I've scared off. Wonderful! Agnostics FTW!!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:27 pm
Actually, I was mostly talking to Racheal. And I was planning on going to sleep since I have school in the morning and right now it's 12:27AM. The reason I came back on was because I don't think I'll be able to sleep because of this argument. And my dog kept wanting outside.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:30 pm
I'm done with this argument, if you would like to continue it, it will have to be another day. I'm going to go and read some articles about a mining operation here in Wisconsin that is raising a lot of trouble.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:35 pm
Alright. By the way, I must admit that you are good with debates. Did you take a class on that?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:38 pm
No, I just naturally am that good, but only with subjects that I study. Sociology happens to be my forte. That is what I want to be, a sociology teacher. But if I'm wrong about something, I'll listen to what is said and do more research on it. I don't like not knowing about something, you know?
And thank you for the compliment. I need to find out if the college I'm at has a debate team.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:42 pm
You're welcome. I want to take a debate class so things like this make good practice. Well I think you'd be good on a debate team. Now I'll let you focus on those articles, and I hope the problems in Wisconsin stop.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:48 pm
I don't think the problems in Wisconsin will stop until we can get somebody who is competent at making the right budget cuts.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:59 pm
Ahh, I see. Well, I guess it's bed time~
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|