|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 4:14 pm
Miriam The Bat The sig IS indeed too wide. It's over 500 pixels wide. Nice though biggrin I hate Deviantart AND Sheezyart, especially since Sheezy took away all of the adult art and insulted the artists who draw adult art. Where would you suggest I get hosted then? 3nodding (thanks, I'll try an resize it...)
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:13 pm
http://www.rocketsoft.gm-school.uni.cc/RSUpload.phpThis is a fairly decent place. The only problem is you have to save all your upload URLs into a notepad document or something because it doesn't make a little gallery of uploads for you like Photobucket. But it also doesn't resize your image and make it look crappy when the file size or image size is too large for their liking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:18 pm
Miriam The Bat The sig IS indeed too wide. It's over 500 pixels wide. Nice though biggrin I hate Deviantart AND Sheezyart, especially since Sheezy took away all of the adult art and insulted the artists who draw adult art. The hell? THey insulted the adult artists too? I thought they only stopped allowing it because the servers they host art on wouldn't let them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:20 pm
Whenever I go to france I see all the museums and they have pictures of naked women, so what's wrong with them removing all the nudity?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:25 pm
guiou126 Whenever I go to france I see all the museums and they have pictures of naked women, so what's wrong with them removing all the nudity? Apparently nudity is only art if the one who made said art has been dead for about two hundred or so years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 6:20 pm
k, so where should kit put her picture?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 6:30 pm
guiou126 k, so where should kit put her picture? plural. I have many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 6:53 pm
DuoTH Miriam The Bat The sig IS indeed too wide. It's over 500 pixels wide. Nice though biggrin I hate Deviantart AND Sheezyart, especially since Sheezy took away all of the adult art and insulted the artists who draw adult art. The hell? THey insulted the adult artists too? I thought they only stopped allowing it because the servers they host art on wouldn't let them. From what I've read: - SheezyArt was not allowed have adult art in the first place, but thought they could get away with it. - Many mods and admins on SheezyArt were underage. - When SheezyArt became popular, they realized they couldn't get away with it, so started claiming they wanted to make Sheezy a "family friendly" place. - One of the admins of Sheezy responded, when questioned about the "mature" art, that they would keep all the art but delete all the smut. He also made comments about the adult art not being real art.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 7:22 pm
why wouldn't they consider that art, they painte stuff like that in the 19th century and it was ok. but if they put it online, people start saying it's smut?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 9:16 pm
Miriam The Bat DuoTH Miriam The Bat The sig IS indeed too wide. It's over 500 pixels wide. Nice though biggrin I hate Deviantart AND Sheezyart, especially since Sheezy took away all of the adult art and insulted the artists who draw adult art. The hell? THey insulted the adult artists too? I thought they only stopped allowing it because the servers they host art on wouldn't let them. From what I've read: - SheezyArt was not allowed have adult art in the first place, but thought they could get away with it. - Many mods and admins on SheezyArt were underage. - When SheezyArt became popular, they realized they couldn't get away with it, so started claiming they wanted to make Sheezy a "family friendly" place. - One of the admins of Sheezy responded, when questioned about the "mature" art, that they would keep all the art but delete all the smut. He also made comments about the adult art not being real art. God, what a bunch of bullcrap. The kid obviously has never taken an actual art course in their life if they think something isn't art just because there's nudity. I would rant some more about how stupid it is but I think that's something more appropriate for my livejournal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:46 pm
That is true DUOTH, those people are a bunch of crazy Mofos, but what site is ok with nudity?
EDit: wait I figured out a site, but you might wanna stretch the truth on what the drawing is about the site is www.transfur.com Sure It has TF art of animals and people, but it allows nudity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 9:01 am
Kitsycool Tenma Aeon Kitsycool guiou126 You're really good at drawing, kit thanks... whee i can decide where I want my art hosted first... *thinks* I would recommend Sheezyart... It's got a much nicer layout than Deviant, and its user pages are easy to customise. But, then again, why settle for a gallery site, when you can have a site of your own? For this, I'd say T35.com, due to the (probably almost) unlimited space. Does it cost money? Free hosting or none, for now. I'll go have a look at sheezy then.... T35 is freeeeeeee! whee ...Though you have to build your own site first, and remote linking isn't allowed. ninja And as for the nudity thing of Sheezy art... please look at their TOS, located conveintly at a link at the bottom of each page. Part V B), sections 5 and 6 are the important ones when considering nudity, or pornography. V B) 5 Submission media, journals, userpage overrides, and/or web cam allotment containing photographic pornography. V B) 6 Submission media, comments, private messages, journals, userpage overrides, and/or web cam allotment that contains content with explicit descriptions and/or depictions of pornography of any type, bestiality, racial slurs, anti-Semitic or other derogatory remarks about philosophies/religions, and/or offensive remarks based on gender or sexual preference. A pornographic submission is defined as: a) Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal. b) Display of sexual fluidsB. c) Implied or depicted acts of sexual penetration or activity. d) Implied or depicted acts of masturbation. e) Nude humanoid subjects in sexually explicit poses. f) Manipulation of breasts/nipples in a sexual manner. g) Nude humanoid subjects engaging in any form of sexually explicit bondage activity. h) Display of genitalia in a manner alluding to and/or depicting sexual activity or arousal. i) Nude underage photography subjects in any form. j) 'Chibi' and/or underage subjects depicted in one or more of the situations/activities listed within this list of criteria. So, tasteful nudity... yes, straight out porn... no. Or naked Chibis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:06 pm
I remember getting several warnings over a picture of Lilith I drew that had nudity in it. This is the CENSORED versionThe picture above is fine, but in the origional, her dress was actually a see-through nightgown, so you could see her naughty bits. When I submitted it to sheezy art, when adult art was alowed, I labled it as "adult". Later that day, an admin changed it to "mature" and I got a warning for it. A warning? Apparently it automatically sends a warning if an admin changes the rating of your picture, even if they're lessening the rating. Like, a week later, I got ANOTHER warning when a moderator decided to change my picture from Mature to Adult. she said she was discusted with me because she found the picture in the Favorites of someone under the age of 18. Woah, hey, this is my fault? So I told her that an admin gave my picture a mature rating. Well, I eventually got a bunch more warnings as various mods and admins kept changing the picture back and fourth between Mature and Adult. It dosen't matter anymore, because it got deleted when they suddenly decided that anyone who draws porn isn't an artist. They should have listened to their TOS in the first place. And still, I don't know if my poor nekkid Lilith picture is a "mature" picture or an "adult" picture. The detail of her two naught bits was basicly two o's with dots in them up top and a Y on the bottom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:11 pm
Ah yes... I remember that picture from back then... and either your description or journal entry describing that situation.
How silly, that the mod thought that his/her view out-ranked that of an Admin. Did you tell the admin that originally changed the rating of your picture about the mod who decided to change it back?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:25 pm
so you and miriam are saying that SA is made up of cnserned mothers who acually give a rat's a** about the art on their site
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
