|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:11 pm
Jarel Damone TheXFactor Jarel Damone i think that's why i never was really interested in this. no one, myself included, really does guild exclusive characters. perhaps i should, but my problem is i don't really feel like i could limit the jarel character to any one guild. any of the unholy alliance characters have been active in too many feds to limit to just one and in our defense, EEW and EWA used to go hand in hand, so it made sense to use the same characters in both. At one point that was fine, but since EWA's inception, it has evolved and moved away from the EEW association, and doesn't consider it apart of EEW in anyway. Which is way I moved Bryan Bain over to EWA, but since then I've dropped him altogether. this may be true, but at this stage, how can any of us really separate our characters an make them exclusive to only one guild? The same way we do everything else. Just do it. I had Talon dip out on EEW when Speed was closed. Bryan Bain just simply stopped showing up on EWA. Tyson I basically kayfabed him into a singing tour, so he's now out working on his music. But if you really want to drop them without making it look stupid, or they're currently in a feud, try ending it in a pink slip match, or loser leaves town. Or Something, it's not that hard to do it. If you think having your character dropping out of Guild all of a sudden will make them look bad or diminish they're career or whatnot, just take a look at Chris Jericho in the WWE, he was abruptly fired when he lost to Cena. yet no one thought less of him. Unless your a mark and don't know what a good wrestler is. Simply having a character leave a guild will not destroy that character or cause negative thoughts about him or her. Just look at this way, they're moving on to bigger and better things.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:14 pm
Maybe it's time to make it a rule and enforce it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:18 pm
Weird Fox Maybe it's time to make it a rule and enforce it. I'd support it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:22 pm
hmm, one problem with your line of thought. some people only have one or two characters. this would force them to try to come up with characters and they wouldn't like it. and also, we 'd have to figure out where to limit our characters to. this would mean solving the riddle of where our character has had the most impact.
for example, the jarel character has made quite a bit of his career in EEW and WWFG, and recently has done really well in EWA. his younger brother character, has had the most success in EEW. janelle's success is more prominent in EEW right at the moment, but prior to this she did far better in guilds like PAW. in addition to that, she's in the middle of plans in EWA. actually, she'd be the easiest of mines to limit, since EWA has the strongest women's division
but examine other people. Landry's character, for example has major storylines in every one of the mainstream guilds. could he really choose to limit himself to just one guild, and use duality in one of the others maybe?
another example, Brantley has one character, brantley summers. same with freakshow. and freakshow is supposedly getting readyt o retire. do you think they'd really be willing to make up another character when they clearly enjoy only having the one?
then there's chrono, whose character by nature is too cocky and arrogant to limit himself. i, as a guild owner, am not willing to try to force people to do things they don't want to do. that would draw heat down on me like the heat tim caught when he told everyone they had to make WWFG exclusive finishers and profiles, not worth it in the end in my opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:34 pm
Jarel Damone but examine other people. Landry's character, for example has major storylines in every one of the mainstream guilds. could he really choose to limit himself to just one guild, and use duality in one of the others maybe? Exactly. What's this about a guild having exclusive finishers?! rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:39 pm
Screw the rules I have money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:41 pm
Beta Flyer Screw the rules I have money. Share or get out!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:43 pm
Weird Fox Maybe it's time to make it a rule and enforce it. Or maybe not. xd @ Cartwright! First you say, "It won't happen." Then it's, "I'd support it." Now you're against it again. You're opinion is as loose as a Thai whore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:46 pm
Weird Fox Weird Fox Maybe it's time to make it a rule and enforce it. Or maybe not. xd @ Cartwright! First you say, "It won't happen." Then it's, "I'd support it." Now you're against it again. You're opinion is as loose as a Thai whore. Well, you wouldn't want your character limited to sucking a duck off in just one guild would you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:46 pm
Weird Fox Weird Fox Maybe it's time to make it a rule and enforce it. Or maybe not. xd @ Cartwright! First you say, "It won't happen." Then it's, "I'd support it." Now you're against it again. You're opinion is as loose as a Thai whore. Aye? I said it wouldn't happen but I'd support it if it did, that's all good gravy. Keep up old boy! razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 12:47 pm
Beta Flyer Weird Fox Weird Fox Maybe it's time to make it a rule and enforce it. Or maybe not. xd @ Cartwright! First you say, "It won't happen." Then it's, "I'd support it." Now you're against it again. You're opinion is as loose as a Thai whore. Well, you wouldn't want your character limited to sucking a duck off in just one guild would you? That kind of golden character development should be seen everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:30 pm
Beta Flyer Weird Fox Weird Fox Maybe it's time to make it a rule and enforce it. Or maybe not. xd @ Cartwright! First you say, "It won't happen." Then it's, "I'd support it." Now you're against it again. You're opinion is as loose as a Thai whore. Well, you wouldn't want your character limited to sucking a duck off in just one guild would you? wow, never thought i'd say this, but i guess if freak gets one you do too. thjat was absolutely win
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:31 pm
Is the FCW/OVW to EWA.. meaning CWL is apart of EWA... Does no one READ THE GUILD? Honestly the major storyline going on in CWL is a tournament named after Yuke..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:21 pm
Here's a proposition, of sorts. Has already been touched on already.
WWE:EWA
WWFG / ?
EEW / ?
DHW / ?
The ? would symbolize a second guild joining them as part of the tournament; it opens it up to allow smaller guilds more exposure, and also allows for two guilds to take the spoils.
Alternatively ..
WWE:E / Indy Guild
WWFG / Indy Guild
EEW / Indy Guild
EWA / Indy Guild
As DHW is technically counted as indy, it could take a spot with any one else. It means that lower guilds can get involved, as well as opening the idea of brother/sister guilds again.
WWE:EWA are brother guilds to each other, on equal par, so if either of them were to take another (indy) guild owner under the wing then that smaller guild would technically be a 'sister' guild. Allows for better guild and community integration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
