|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 5:11 pm
The Darth Vizzle The rose in spring CemeteryPirate The rose in spring The idea that you think people testing other people's theories to generate the same result is faulty, then why do you think that some idiotic youtuber is any better? That guy has no 8+ years of paleontology or archaeology. The people at TalkOrigins do. If you are talking about Obscurus, he clearly stated he doesnt even watch youtube videos, let alone trust the makers of those videos. I believe the point is that you shouldn't trust anything or anyone 100%. He's not qualified to make that judgement. And who says you're qualified to make that judgment about him? When you can't even spell judgment? Maybe next time you should stop being so butthurt just because someone doesn't share your religiosity over a certain idea or concept, that way you can avoid getting trapped in dumbass logical fallacies where you try to discredit someone just because they have a different opinion than you. Word.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 6:38 pm
i think dragons were done in by tigers, and suzakus done in by flying turtles, then the cow gods known as the moo lords took away there powers to make GMO cows............XD
*if you get mad you has no sense of humor*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:25 pm
The rose in spring CemeteryPirate The rose in spring The idea that you think people testing other people's theories to generate the same result is faulty, then why do you think that some idiotic youtuber is any better? That guy has no 8+ years of paleontology or archaeology. The people at TalkOrigins do. If you are talking about Obscurus, he clearly stated he doesnt even watch youtube videos, let alone trust the makers of those videos. I believe the point is that you shouldn't trust anything or anyone 100%. He's not qualified to make that judgement. What judgment am I making? Also this: The Darth Vizzle And who says you're qualified to make that judgment about him? When you can't even spell judgment? Maybe next time you should stop being so butthurt just because someone doesn't share your religiosity over a certain idea or concept, that way you can avoid getting trapped in dumbass logical fallacies where you try to discredit someone just because they have a different opinion than you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:22 am
The Darth Vizzle The rose in spring CemeteryPirate The rose in spring The idea that you think people testing other people's theories to generate the same result is faulty, then why do you think that some idiotic youtuber is any better? That guy has no 8+ years of paleontology or archaeology. The people at TalkOrigins do. If you are talking about Obscurus, he clearly stated he doesnt even watch youtube videos, let alone trust the makers of those videos. I believe the point is that you shouldn't trust anything or anyone 100%. He's not qualified to make that judgement. And who says you're qualified to make that judgment about him? When you can't even spell judgment? Maybe next time you should stop being so butthurt just because someone doesn't share your religiosity over a certain idea or concept, that way you can avoid getting trapped in dumbass logical fallacies where you try to discredit someone just because they have a different opinion than you. Oh Jesus Christ. Not this. Listen. An opinion is not an opinion when it's dead wrong. At that point, you are heading into the realm of reality where things are what they are.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:02 pm
The rose in spring The Darth Vizzle The rose in spring CemeteryPirate The rose in spring The idea that you think people testing other people's theories to generate the same result is faulty, then why do you think that some idiotic youtuber is any better? That guy has no 8+ years of paleontology or archaeology. The people at TalkOrigins do. If you are talking about Obscurus, he clearly stated he doesnt even watch youtube videos, let alone trust the makers of those videos. I believe the point is that you shouldn't trust anything or anyone 100%. He's not qualified to make that judgement. And who says you're qualified to make that judgment about him? When you can't even spell judgment? Maybe next time you should stop being so butthurt just because someone doesn't share your religiosity over a certain idea or concept, that way you can avoid getting trapped in dumbass logical fallacies where you try to discredit someone just because they have a different opinion than you. Oh Jesus Christ. Not this. Listen. An opinion is not an opinion when it's dead wrong. At that point, you are heading into the realm of reality where things are what they are. An opinion is an opinion regardless. A fact isn't a fact if it's wrong and that's a fact. An opinion will remain the same because it's personal in its creation. In the realm of opinions there are no wrong or right answers; just people and their theories. It is my opinion that you're annoying, but some could disagree with that based on knowing you previously or at a time when you weren't. Therefore their opinions are different. But to me, and my opinion that's not wrong, you're annoying and that's right because, to me, you're annoying. (For the record I don't think you're annoying; just an example that befits the mood of the thread) C'mon, what is Religion then? Opinion or Fact?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:50 pm
TrutherMei Don't be so quick to dismiss the possibility that dinosaurs continued to exist in human times. There are many anomalies in history that say otherwise. http://www.debate.org/debates/Dinosaurs-co-existed-with-mankind/1/ This is a pretty bad source, the guy is losing pretty nicely.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:06 pm
As for my thoughts, I have no reason to believe in any dragons or such. No fossils were found. I can't say for sure as to why.
As for dinosaurs and humans living together? That doesn't make sense. Dinosaurs had a much larger gap between them and humans, not even close enough for it to be possible. To disbelieve this would be to say humans have not evolved smooth enough through life.
I believe someone said the government was covering up the fossils? I'm sorry to be a d**k about this, but why is it that when something can't be proven, the government stepping in makes sense? The government would have no reason to disprove dragons existing. They have no power over that discovery, anyway. If they wanted to hide dragons from us, which I couldn't see why, they'd also hide dinosaurs. However, we know they existed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:58 pm
Azkeel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komodo_dragon Dragons there ya go what do I win? xd There's also the very fierce bearded dragon ninja Cheat. >_______>
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 6:18 pm
Captain_Shinzo Azkeel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komodo_dragon Dragons there ya go what do I win? xd There's also the very fierce bearded dragon ninja Cheat. >_______> Sometimes the simplest and most obvious answer is the best?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:37 am
dragons? dinosaurs? xd This thread has my vote - keep it going. 3nodding lol I adore both those magnificent, powerful creatures ^^ My nick on IRC is stego razz much of my art is fantasy junk razz but I believe it IS just fantasy (now) - for what is fantasy but just something so distant you don't believe it to be true............
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:48 pm
They don't now or never did at all before? Also, what kind of dragons are you speaking of? Big flying fire breathing magical ones? or just big lizards? o_O
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:58 pm
Captain_Shinzo As for my thoughts, I have no reason to believe in any dragons or such. No fossils were found. I can't say for sure as to why.
As for dinosaurs and humans living together? That doesn't make sense. Dinosaurs had a much larger gap between them and humans, not even close enough for it to be possible. To disbelieve this would be to say humans have not evolved smooth enough through life.
I believe someone said the government was covering up the fossils? I'm sorry to be a d**k about this, but why is it that when something can't be proven, the government stepping in makes sense? The government would have no reason to disprove dragons existing. They have no power over that discovery, anyway. If they wanted to hide dragons from us, which I couldn't see why, they'd also hide dinosaurs. However, we know they existed. You bring up a good point there but I guess it's just because the government does have a history of hiding things from us. For whatever reason, they hid the dragons from us maybe because in the sense that Dragons had access to different realms and took people into spiritual journeys? That's what I heard anyway, but in my opinion, I think dragons were killed and made extinct intentionally by something because Humans and Dragons cannot live together, Dragons would not let us live in peace and create large structures and civilizations.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|