|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 9:24 pm
The rose in spring Tympest The rose in spring Sephroe Zion The rose in spring If your speech ever gets to the point that it threatens the popularity of an owner, you will die. Why do you think we can send people away forever and murder them? There is no reason to believe that people like Bradley Manning and Julian Assange are still alive. You're neglecting the power of association. Do you think nobody would notice if Julian Assange and Manning were assassinated publicly or privately? The family and friends would spread that information like a plague, especially supporters of Assange. Even if nobody in the media mentioned it, it would be all over YouTube, and broadcasted by Anonymous which is very supportive of Assanage. FYI (to my knowledge) Assange is on house arrest. He even made a fake Mater Card commercial which people are sharing since his trials. Protect the internet with your life, and you will ALWAYS have able speech. Even if people cut your vocal cords and chop off your hands so you can't use sign language. You can always type a message, write documents, and mail/email them to anyone anywhere in the world. And if you are killed, people will know. The special interests won't assassinate anyone unless you are directly causing significant financial damage and limiting access to their resources. Assange and Manning weren't doing either, but what they were doing was publicly humiliating to the special interests. Words don't go far if the owners don't want it to. And just who are these "owners" supposed to be? Who's got you so convinced that consequence free speech doesn't exist? The owners are the big business owners, politicians and the assorted people of extreme wealth. The people are in control of our every lives through the forces of money directly or indirectly and this has always been the case. Long before capitalism, long before Rome and long before currency, the wealthiest of the nation were always the ones who controlled it. After all, money is power. It is more powerful than the lives of others and the longevity of nations and the bourgeois control it. Of course control like that doesn't work quite as well in a time where people have the number of choices we do today. A little research would go a long way to avoiding certain companies and it's fairly easy to develop skills like gardening to avoid supporting the associated companies. Money means nothing if people can choose not to buy. If they have so much power, why has no concerted attempt been made to prevent people from learning to do for themselves? I figure they can make it easier to purchase rather than doing, but can't actually force anyone to purchase rather than make.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:02 am
Tympest The rose in spring Tympest The rose in spring Sephroe Zion The rose in spring If your speech ever gets to the point that it threatens the popularity of an owner, you will die. Why do you think we can send people away forever and murder them? There is no reason to believe that people like Bradley Manning and Julian Assange are still alive. You're neglecting the power of association. Do you think nobody would notice if Julian Assange and Manning were assassinated publicly or privately? The family and friends would spread that information like a plague, especially supporters of Assange. Even if nobody in the media mentioned it, it would be all over YouTube, and broadcasted by Anonymous which is very supportive of Assanage. FYI (to my knowledge) Assange is on house arrest. He even made a fake Mater Card commercial which people are sharing since his trials. Protect the internet with your life, and you will ALWAYS have able speech. Even if people cut your vocal cords and chop off your hands so you can't use sign language. You can always type a message, write documents, and mail/email them to anyone anywhere in the world. And if you are killed, people will know. The special interests won't assassinate anyone unless you are directly causing significant financial damage and limiting access to their resources. Assange and Manning weren't doing either, but what they were doing was publicly humiliating to the special interests. Words don't go far if the owners don't want it to. And just who are these "owners" supposed to be? Who's got you so convinced that consequence free speech doesn't exist? The owners are the big business owners, politicians and the assorted people of extreme wealth. The people are in control of our every lives through the forces of money directly or indirectly and this has always been the case. Long before capitalism, long before Rome and long before currency, the wealthiest of the nation were always the ones who controlled it. After all, money is power. It is more powerful than the lives of others and the longevity of nations and the bourgeois control it. Of course control like that doesn't work quite as well in a time where people have the number of choices we do today. A little research would go a long way to avoiding certain companies and it's fairly easy to develop skills like gardening to avoid supporting the associated companies. Money means nothing if people can choose not to buy. If they have so much power, why has no concerted attempt been made to prevent people from learning to do for themselves? I figure they can make it easier to purchase rather than doing, but can't actually force anyone to purchase rather than make. You don't understand. You don't have any choices. You have owners. They own you. You are a slave. You want to know what your choices are? Paper or plastic, window seat or aisle, credit or debit. Very meaningless. No matter what you do in life, your money goes to the owners and in the end, people in the US are making less money while the cost of living goes up. You want to know the kind of places that had a decay like that? Sudan, Kosovo, Libya, Syria. And if you honestly think the owners wouldn't kill us, you'd be surprised to know that they already have before. Kent State, 1970. Several protesters were shot by the Ohio National guard. They were unarmed, nonviolent. What was their crime? They were protesting the Vietnam War. The hippie era was getting to the point where they were actually threatening foreign policy in the US. So what did the owners do? They killed them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:35 am
The rose in spring Tympest The rose in spring Tympest The rose in spring Words don't go far if the owners don't want it to. And just who are these "owners" supposed to be? Who's got you so convinced that consequence free speech doesn't exist? The owners are the big business owners, politicians and the assorted people of extreme wealth. The people are in control of our every lives through the forces of money directly or indirectly and this has always been the case. Long before capitalism, long before Rome and long before currency, the wealthiest of the nation were always the ones who controlled it. After all, money is power. It is more powerful than the lives of others and the longevity of nations and the bourgeois control it. Of course control like that doesn't work quite as well in a time where people have the number of choices we do today. A little research would go a long way to avoiding certain companies and it's fairly easy to develop skills like gardening to avoid supporting the associated companies. Money means nothing if people can choose not to buy. If they have so much power, why has no concerted attempt been made to prevent people from learning to do for themselves? I figure they can make it easier to purchase rather than doing, but can't actually force anyone to purchase rather than make. You don't understand. You don't have any choices. You have owners. They own you. You are a slave. You want to know what your choices are? Paper or plastic, window seat or aisle, credit or debit. Very meaningless. No matter what you do in life, your money goes to the owners and in the end, people in the US are making less money while the cost of living goes up. You want to know the kind of places that had a decay like that? Sudan, Kosovo, Libya, Syria. And if you honestly think the owners wouldn't kill us, you'd be surprised to know that they already have before. Kent State, 1970. Several protesters were shot by the Ohio National guard. They were unarmed, nonviolent. What was their crime? They were protesting the Vietnam War. The hippie era was getting to the point where they were actually threatening foreign policy in the US. So what did the owners do? They killed them. You're spinning here. Yeah, the government is over dependent on the support of big business, but unless you can prove to me with links and references that these so called "owners" exist I'm going continue living my life and making my choices. Another point where you're spinning, the Kent State protestors set fire to the campus ROTC building and, when the National Guard ordered them to disperse, refused and threw rocks. The National Guard then used tear gas and the protestors responded with more rocks and threw the tear gas canisters back at the National Guard. Yes, the National Guard over reacted by then shooting into the crowd, but the protestors were by no means entirely peaceful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:30 pm
Tympest The rose in spring Tympest The rose in spring Tympest The rose in spring Words don't go far if the owners don't want it to. And just who are these "owners" supposed to be? Who's got you so convinced that consequence free speech doesn't exist? The owners are the big business owners, politicians and the assorted people of extreme wealth. The people are in control of our every lives through the forces of money directly or indirectly and this has always been the case. Long before capitalism, long before Rome and long before currency, the wealthiest of the nation were always the ones who controlled it. After all, money is power. It is more powerful than the lives of others and the longevity of nations and the bourgeois control it. Of course control like that doesn't work quite as well in a time where people have the number of choices we do today. A little research would go a long way to avoiding certain companies and it's fairly easy to develop skills like gardening to avoid supporting the associated companies. Money means nothing if people can choose not to buy. If they have so much power, why has no concerted attempt been made to prevent people from learning to do for themselves? I figure they can make it easier to purchase rather than doing, but can't actually force anyone to purchase rather than make. You don't understand. You don't have any choices. You have owners. They own you. You are a slave. You want to know what your choices are? Paper or plastic, window seat or aisle, credit or debit. Very meaningless. No matter what you do in life, your money goes to the owners and in the end, people in the US are making less money while the cost of living goes up. You want to know the kind of places that had a decay like that? Sudan, Kosovo, Libya, Syria. And if you honestly think the owners wouldn't kill us, you'd be surprised to know that they already have before. Kent State, 1970. Several protesters were shot by the Ohio National guard. They were unarmed, nonviolent. What was their crime? They were protesting the Vietnam War. The hippie era was getting to the point where they were actually threatening foreign policy in the US. So what did the owners do? They killed them. You're spinning here. Yeah, the government is over dependent on the support of big business, but unless you can prove to me with links and references that these so called "owners" exist I'm going continue living my life and making my choices. Another point where you're spinning, the Kent State protestors set fire to the campus ROTC building and, when the National Guard ordered them to disperse, refused and threw rocks. The National Guard then used tear gas and the protestors responded with more rocks and threw the tear gas canisters back at the National Guard. Yes, the National Guard over reacted by then shooting into the crowd, but the protestors were by no means entirely peaceful. There is no difference between government and big business. They are all the same. Proof is all around you. Your slavery and your ancestor's slavery is self-evident. Right now, an officer can search your house, tap your phones and watch what you surf online without any warrant. The government can arrest you for saying the wrong thing, protesting the wrong thing, buying a gun at the wrong time or being the wrong religion. And once you are arrested, they can take you away to get tortured and executed without a jury or trial or lawyer. And it's not just today. They did the same with the Japanese Americans and since the Japanese-American population dropped, we can safely say that it was a genocide. We can also talk about wars, how not only American wars, but every war was caused by nobles and driven by money. They were also by no means armed. They pretty much got to the point that Syria got to when they started shooting at its people. Governments do not differ. Politicians like to use words like Tyrant or Fascist. In reality, there is no difference between the US, Europe and Libya. All 3 of them have demonstrated their willingness to kill their own people to prevent government change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 9:20 pm
Freedom of speech is under siege video taken down. Apparently freedom of speech is under siege.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 10:35 pm
Avoid the Pendulum Freedom of speech is under siege video taken down. Apparently freedom of speech is under siege. I lol'd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 6:08 pm
sheesh, just keep speaking up and we shall win like the dancing protests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:33 pm
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/03/02/japan-invents-speech-jamming-gun-that-silences-people-mid-sentence/?intcmp=trending
freedom of speech SERIOUSLY UNDER THREAT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:46 am
Well if you are worried about losing your freedom of speech, don't worry. You never had it to begin with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:01 pm
In the Future:
Girl- Mommy,what is Freedom..?
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
