|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:35 pm
Okay. Itadakimasu.
Or whatever the Japanese say.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:38 pm
I didn't know, since I went off of the picture where both legs are over the victim's shoulders. The description really wasn't that clear. In any case, it would be my left shoulder in Athena's hold.
Which is... exactly what Rampage is doing. So. If it's acceptable, I'm going to rewind and go from where Athena starts the hold.
Sound okay?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:38 pm
It doesnt really matter since in both posts she is doing the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:40 pm
... Yeah.
Now I'm just cutting out the shoulder thing entirely. Going for the support behind the ribs... up-down-boom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:13 pm
Since I was mistaken about the whole shoulder thing, and that's pretty much all we've been focusing on for half a page, I rewound to the point where you did your clamp-doodly.
Otherwise... I don't know what would happen. Reiko didn't seem to have a problem with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 8:32 pm
Well, you two stayed in the same time frame.. for no other reason other than to debate the trivial positioning of hands as though you were doing Wing Chun on the ground.
Because of this.. I told Sky that it didn't really matter since .. well.. nothing changed in either post.
Unless Athena saw your post as a thwarted attempt.. in which case.. if you deleted something you probably shouldn't have.. since.. the timeline was in fact.. progressing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:21 am
I didn't delete anything. I edited one thing that I screwed up about, but nothing was deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:32 am
Yes, screwed up. And that's why I find this particularly disagreeable. I am doing the same thing, only with my left hand only reacting to an action from her, but she is doing different things. She did an attempt, but failed, having forgotten about her action in her post before. As a result, that is something by her fault, and creates consequence for her. I don't see a reason to rewind, since I'm not at fault here.
Sorry, but it seems like I'm being punished, if you rewind, for you not following in consistency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:06 pm
What Sky is saying is...
Her response is one born of actual misunderstanding about what is going on. A "physical inconsistency" in actions.
But if you really have a problem with it.. she'll fix it.. or die.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:44 pm
I don't know anymore. It's Saturday now, so I'm sure our match won't go that far from where it's at now with the ending of the time limit. I'm relieved. Though not satisfied in the least, as a fighter. But I have learned some things in this tournament, one being to create a post style that'll make fighting hand to hand better to visualize and understand, even though I did as much detail as possible to show what I was doing. Though it made it length and made me seem all technical. Yet, I've seen Sieg from Lu Bu do it many times when he explained a complex move, so I was safe to assume that no one would find it hard to read.
Despite it all, this was a good tournament, Crawley.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:42 am
I'd fix it, but I don't know how. Like you said, my mistake was that I didn't fully understand what was being done. Since I know better now, I don't think it's fair to penalize me for not being able to understand someone else's moves, especially when I asked for clarification and didn't really get any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:56 pm
I gave you as much clarification as I could, from my posts ic to ooc. I don't really know what to say to that claim, other than I explained it the best I could. We both see no reason to be penalized, therefore, it's really back to a two-sided view on things. I don't know what to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 5:24 pm
One of you guys just lose already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:48 pm
One of you guys call the fight. We were told that Saturday was the deadline for posting.
... We're done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
