|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 5:59 am
Went to Fabriclive on Friday and it was awesome as always.
I went to TDK Cross Central on Sunday.
It pretty much sucked. A lot of acts cancelled. I didn't get my ticket refunded because really I went to see Amon Tobin who was still playing... but the set he played was disappointing especially since he was so amazing when I went to France to see him! I've been to that place before and they seem to fill the venue at least twice it's capacity. The first time I went the music was better but there was condensed sweat dripping from the ceiling because of all the people there. gonk The drinks are expensive and the event managers there seem only to be interested in money.
I left at about 2am when it ended at 6am.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:55 pm
Snakes on a Plane-
Entertaining, but as a film it's terrible. xD And the snakes look so retarded. Especially the anaconda.
gonk @ the internet cliches.
Snakes ON CRACK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:53 am
I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THESE MOTHER ********' SNAKES ON THIS MOTHER ********' PLANE! scream
That film was legendary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:40 am
Szinriia Snakes on a Plane-
Entertaining, but as a film it's terrible. xD And the snakes look so retarded. Especially the anaconda.
gonk @ the internet cliches.
Snakes ON CRACK. Is it amusing in the fact that it's meant to be terrible?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:29 pm
Tommy the Cat Szinriia Snakes on a Plane-
Entertaining, but as a film it's terrible. xD And the snakes look so retarded. Especially the anaconda.
gonk @ the internet cliches.
Snakes ON CRACK. Is it amusing in the fact that it's meant to be terrible?
Yes of course I realised it was meant to be... that to me does not give it any sort of credit. Practically anyone could make a movie that's supposed to be terrible. The only difference is that Samuel L. was in it... that was the only impressive thing about the movie.
I was just reminded of when we went to see Red Eye and me and Hana were dead. xD Wes Craven sucks so hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:09 am
Szinriia Tommy the Cat Szinriia Snakes on a Plane-
Entertaining, but as a film it's terrible. xD And the snakes look so retarded. Especially the anaconda.
gonk @ the internet cliches.
Snakes ON CRACK. Is it amusing in the fact that it's meant to be terrible?
Yes of course I realised it was meant to be... that to me does not give it any sort of credit. Practically anyone could make a movie that's supposed to be terrible. The only difference is that Samuel L. was in it... that was the only impressive thing about the movie.
I was just reminded of when we went to see Red Eye and me and Hana were dead. xD Wes Craven sucks so hard.Oh yeah I remember. Good to see you're over your small case of death now. Was red eye meant to be terrible too? They did a good job on that one. I'm now trying to think of a good film Wes Craven has been behind... And I still must see snakes on a plane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:24 am
Tommy the Cat Oh yeah I remember. Good to see you're over your small case of death now. Was red eye meant to be terrible too? They did a good job on that one. I'm now trying to think of a good film Wes Craven has been behind... And I still must see snakes on a plane.
I think Wes Craven in some of his films must be trying to be funny. He seems to have trademark "comic relief" characters. I saw his first film "Last house on the left" and it had a couple of thick cops. (In fact he seems to like that character stereotype, which worked a lot better in the kitcshy "Scream") In that film which had quite graphic scenes including rape it seemed very out of place to include comic relief moments and characters.
He did this as far as I can see for one of two reasons:
1. He's a s**t filmmaker.
2. He's a sick, sick man...
...and a s**t filmmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:38 am
I'm loving the TV series "Heroes" at the moment. (:
At first when Hana described it to me I thought it sounded a bit rubbish. She said that there were people that discovered they had cool superhero like abilities. I asked "Like x-men?" to which she replied "Yeah I guess, but not really!" I said that it sounded rubbish.
She started watching a new episode on her computer (she had to download it as it wasn't out here - is now on sci-fi channel I think) and then I started watching too because it was actually pretty cool. (:
I'm now addicted.
Edit: I don't dislike x-men. I just thought a tv ripoff would be rubbish. xP
It's not a TV ripoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:25 am
300
heart scream cool
An excellent review if I do say so myself. mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:11 pm
Madness?
... THIS. IS. SPARRRRRTAAAAAA!!!!!!! scream scream
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:17 am
Seen it twice now, would love to see it again and again, but don't want to spend £5 each time to see it. :Sweat:
And was it just me, or did the Queen person have <********> nipples?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 3:59 am
I can't say I paid that much attention to her nipples!
I want to see it at the IMAX!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 8:12 am
You should have, they were huge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:21 am
Well next time I see I won't be able to help noticing!
I think smaller nipples are better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
