|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:53 pm
Thanks for bringing that up Missy I almost forgot about the copy thing. . . ' ';
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:57 pm
Shinsua The only reason youre being somewhat ignored is because you comment on most everything in a snarky manner. Rather than reiterate a problem, just post what you think should be done. . . At least. . .thats what I think. . . This is just text. Whatever tone not explicitly stated is created by the reader. If you want to think of it that way then I can't stop you. But all I was doing was voicing my opinion, he then . He gave me no other information than a possible guild reset and my RPC being "nerfed". If he didn't want me to defend my position then he shouldn't have shrugged off my concerns like they were irrelevant, as he does with most things I bring up. He could have at least addressed them a little more thoroughly.
Edit: I progressed the discussion, by further clarifying my viewpoint when he, in essence, ignored it the first time around. I received the exact same response. That's his fault, not mine. You don't answer someone the same way after they express their concerns in full. That in itself is completely and utterly insulting in nature.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:01 pm
Its the words you use that make it seem snarky I dont know. . .whatever. . . Its irrelevent Read our PM, that sheds alittle more light on what Im attempting to say. . .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:12 pm
You mean the ones I used when he insulted me by answering two different questions with the same response?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:16 pm
I would also like to point out that in my first post as a response to this idea I said we should have a vote on this. That was widely ignored, actually... I think it was entirely ignored.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:23 pm
I dont think we talked about it after I cleared it all up Ive got a post on 3599 that pretty much says what will be happening Im going to post a view ideas and throw a poll onto the thread Then we'll let everyone decide on what they want to do
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:35 am
My opinion and link are in the admin chat for you Shin, though I think this nerfing will lead to a pattern, I will see how bad you change Qastor but if its too low for my liking I will just have him fight Kentan unnerfed and then kill him when our match is over. Cause Qastor in my opinion is weak, if he is so strong then how come whenever he fights in his own rank he loses, if Qastors over powered than all people above Jounin are also over powered and every S rank rpc should be nerfed till its Jounin level. Not trying to be rude but Im just saying, Id rather have him dead than made even weaker than he already is, also in that case we should remove Rinnegan too cause its over powered and could beat me easily.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:29 am
*Brings in an extreme amount of cookies* ...Morning.... Happy birthday, Shin *hands shin a cookie cake*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:32 am
EnergyHawk *Brings in an extreme amount of cookies* ...Morning.... Happy birthday, Shin *hands shin a cookie cake* -steals cookie from energy- Morning xD -noms cookie while debating on stealing a piece of cookie cake-
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:38 am
*Whacks Kenji's hand* Ne, Now isn't the time to be stealing things. 'Specially Shin's birthday cookie.
I would've stayed on till two in the morning to participate in this chat, but I would have fallen asleep on my poor netbook.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:44 am
JMan 240 Shinsua The only reason youre being somewhat ignored is because you comment on most everything in a snarky manner. Rather than reiterate a problem, just post what you think should be done. . . At least. . .thats what I think. . . This is just text. Whatever tone not explicitly stated is created by the reader. If you want to think of it that way then I can't stop you. But all I was doing was voicing my opinion, he then . He gave me no other information than a possible guild reset and my RPC being "nerfed". If he didn't want me to defend my position then he shouldn't have shrugged off my concerns like they were irrelevant, as he does with most things I bring up. He could have at least addressed them a little more thoroughly.
Edit: I progressed the discussion, by further clarifying my viewpoint when he, in essence, ignored it the first time around. I received the exact same response. That's his fault, not mine. You don't answer someone the same way after they express their concerns in full. That in itself is completely and utterly insulting in nature.Here's why i ignored you every time, first your rude we hadnt made an decisions as to what would be happening in the guild yet and you jump down are throats moaning its wrong all you ever do is moan jon. "Im not being listened to silk doesn't like my opinions blah blah blah your annoying me is exactly what i meant thats why i shrugged you off because it wasnt a ffing definite so shut and jon before moaning as per usual. as a captain i dont usually act out like this but with everything i try and do you moan that i dont like you or something so i gave your more responsibility asked your opinion yet you still moaned so i cant be arsed with you your genuinely annoying me now and i dont want your opinion. Some people will have there RPC's ability nerfed end of
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:59 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:01 pm
calling all kmods admin chat.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:10 pm
What's with the profile check? Has someone been doing something they shouldn't? Or is this something you guys do normally?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|