|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:57 pm
I'm guilty of editing typos, too... emo I'll stop as well, but it may take me longer to post. xd Anyway, searching for clues in Shiny's posts, I came across these conversations... Shiny Gligar Cabron the Swan Shiny Gligar Cabron the Swan l-Kathulu-l True, but people also seem to be agreed to vote for Med if he can't defend himself. I don't want to, but I may vote if it starts heading that way. But for now I'll remain dormant on the vote I don't see any landslide agreement to lynch Med. Are you sure this plan was discussed...
in the thread? wink He means the people who posted about how they want to hear Med's defense. It can be easily implied that if they WANT to hear it first, that if they don't, they'll vote for him.
He's probably having surprise buttsecks though. Generally the implications are the opposite; keep him around until he has the opportunity to defend himself to avoid a hasty decision. Why do you think the Mafia tend to lurk anyway?
That's true. I mean, a simple FoS would be enough to get a defense from Medeus, whatever he needs to defend. O:
Shiny Gligar Looking back, and assuming that if they want a defense and don't get one that they will vote on Med, there was five other people excluding Wylr who wants to hear Med's defense. Stag even said she'll vote him if he doesn't defend. I dunno.
Kath said he'd bandwagon though. I'm not too worried about this as it is a very long Day One. Hell, I meta-bandwagoned. We always vote no lynch for Day one. :I I'll be more worried if he keeps this attitude up though.
The sheep would follow the wolf if he dressed like the herder. Meaning that bandwagoning is never okay. :/
Although, Wylr's vote is based almost entirely on the fact that Medeus is conversing a lot more when I'm almost positive this is the first time both Medeus and Cookie have played a mafia together. Or at least played together when they are gaying it up biggrin At first, I bolded the sentences that gave me an implication, but I decided not to and see if you guys notice anything suspicious from these posts yourselves. If you guys don't, then maybe my suspicions are nothing.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:57 pm
Scruffy, this is why you're not a prosecutor.
PS: I still don't think either Scruffy or Dragn is guilty... For some reason. Gut? GUTSMAN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:58 pm
Hobo, I'm not defending myself, I FoSing you. You quickly bandwagoned Azn's randomly generated vote, and I say that qualifies as suspicion. Your constant rambling isn't helping your case at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:01 pm
SoThatAznGirl @ZK and Kath: Yup, just adding. And not the only one who's done that so far, but I'd rather not give names, it might look mean. : ( But I've haven't seen anything legit suspicious yet. And I haven't done it before, and I won't do it again.
@Dragn: Also, there was a question from Maru to you about how you feel about Medeus, and I don't think you answered. Would you, please? Didn't see the question (may have been while I was at work? Not sure), and right now, I don't have an opinion on Medeus, though there seems to be a fair bit of buzz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:04 pm
I think it's weird how everyone is calling for people to defend themselves. I usually take a OH GOD I CAN'T TRUST ANYONE AHHH approach.
If you FoS for mistrusting someone, and ask them to defend themselves... how can you believe their defense? ;__;
Ow my brain DX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:04 pm
I just think that Glaru was trying to defend Med a little too hard. Hence my vote for Med.
And for tonight I'm heading off, no laptop capabilities and I only have an iTouch, so I'll try and check in again in an hour or so
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:05 pm
Hobo Scruffy And yet you failed to defend it when when a promted you to. And you still haven't. All game(until now) all of your posts have been baseless shots in the dark without a word of why. Even against me, whom you consider voting against, you've got nothing to back you up.
Really, trying that approach again? I told you last time that STAG's vote is not why I suspect you, it was just the segway that led to so much more to go on.
Playing it safe? Maybe when you were trying to go under the radar but now you are saying all the wrong things. You're doing a terrible job of playing it safe.
You insist you have a defense. We've yet to hear it. It's just been deflection after deflection. Now out with it; why haven't you gone through with any of your suspicions? ;; *fears the hobo*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:05 pm
 PLEASE LISTEN!I feel like everyone's ignored everything I've said about Cookie. What's up with that? D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:06 pm
My internet is SUCH a**!
Anyways, I think im pretty caught up... Whats the tally so far? There were a lot of vote/ unvote/ im-not-even-sure-what-to-do's...
Kath, I agree, that was my thought earlier on as well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:06 pm
Surfing gaia is okay on an iPhone/ iPod Touch.
Posting is suicide.
See ya, Kath-Loops!
Also, I didn't see anything suspicious in what Med wrote...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:10 pm
I_love_Inuyasha1 I think it's weird how everyone is calling for people to defend themselves. I usually take a OH GOD I CAN'T TRUST ANYONE AHHH approach. If you FoS for mistrusting someone, and ask them to defend themselves... how can you believe their defense? ;__; Ow my brain DX
@Maru: I don't see anything suspicious, but at this point, I'm tired of re-reading : (. Sorry!
@Sora: I saw, and yeah he's suspicious, but so many others are, too.
@Dragn: The question was right before day 1 results were posted, so you were on, but with all the traffic, yeah you probably missed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:11 pm
I_love_Inuyasha1 Surfing gaia is okay on an iPhone/ iPod Touch. Posting is suicide. See ya, Kath-Loops! Also, I didn't see anything suspicious in what Med wrote... Me either. I just think that with Wylr suspecting him, and then him being killed, it makes him seem guilty. But it also seems that he was Vig killed. The only way I can think of anything is that if the Vig just killed Wylr to kill him, or if Med is Tubba. But, that's just an accusation, and no actual facts to back it up. So take it or leave it, my vote will stand. And what Azn posted with Hobo is something that should be looked into.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:11 pm
dragn99 Hobo, I'm not defending myself, I FoSing you. You quickly bandwagoned Azn's randomly generated vote, and I say that qualifies as suspicion. Your constant rambling isn't helping your case at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:15 pm
J of The Wind My internet is SUCH a**! Anyways, I think im pretty caught up... Whats the tally so far? There were a lot of vote/ unvote/ im-not-even-sure-what-to-do's... Kath, I agree, that was my thought earlier on as well...
Hobo - 1 (Mizu)
Med - 1 (Kath)
Cookie - 1 (Sora)
Look into it, but a) I unvoted, b) I said why in the first place, and c) I wasn't the first to random generate. I feel like this sounds attitude-y, but I don't want it to...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:16 pm
sora4126 PLEASE LISTEN! I feel like everyone's ignored everything I've said about Cookie. What's up with that? D: I think you presented the best case tonight. I didn't suspect Cookie at all, but after reading what you said it does seem possible. I'll have to hear Cookie's defense before deciding to vote on him, though. Now, your turn: what do you think of my research? ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
