Welcome to Gaia! ::

I think there's only a few places where we hit a 3 point margin. Once in the first round with a single judge, and then maybe elsewhere, but I'm too lazy to check.

All I know was, we were generally consistent with one another on team scores. It was usually in the same range you just stated, but a couple of times there would be one judge who had a bigger variance.

I think anything where the judges vary by 3 or more points without good reason is inconsistent. I can understand varying up to two points in some cases, and three in maybe some really extreme ones where dominance never came into play, but that should be rare.

Perfect Score Denied.

It does make you wonder why the results in a given category vary so much at times, but I suppose it goes to show that different people look at things in different ways.

Reread the scores, you won.

Best be ready. I'm bringing the Fury! And the Pain! And the Fear. ...And the Sorrow.

And ultimately the End.

Maybe the Joy.

What about the Ocelot?

I'm rather frustrated that it seems that no torunament judge has any concept of meta gaming and why it is bad. I just got my comments, and one of the big annoying ones was this: "Doesn't he know how a tessen works?" Regardless of whether I do or not (I don't), my character obviously doesn't, so me roleplaying it as if he does is entirely cheating. Stuff like this irks me, a player who tries to play his character, well, to character.

They probably mean you, not your character.

Which means they think you did something without understanding the underlying mechanics, which doesn't have to do with metagaming, so much as knowing what the ******** is going on.