|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:54 pm
Been busy with work lately, how are you people? @_@
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 8:31 pm
slow, lazy and lost control of my life
ITS 4:30, THE ******** AM I DOING SUDDENLY UP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 6:17 am
Limbo baby. Hard time finding sleep lately ¯3¯
edit: wait a sec... this sorta sounds sexy. It's not :V
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:51 am
That was the shortest join request I ever accepted anywhere ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 1:10 pm
swarf zOMG Servers Offline for FixesIn order to avoid the outage we had this morning we're taking the zOMG servers offline while our computer wizards conjure server sprites to exorcise the demons of downtime. Their incantations will take 30-45 minutes and then the game will be back up.
Finally.
I can't be the only one who's been waiting for Server sprites, eh? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 3:39 pm
I like pixies better... cry
The servers were going wonky... why again? I pretty much missed this "Big Crash" that wasn't that big.
I don't think they were fixing anything in-game either... but...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:09 pm
Quintafeira12 I like pixies better... cry The servers were going wonky... why again? I pretty much missed this "Big Crash" that wasn't that big. I don't think they were fixing anything in-game either... but...
They all disappeared. We were down to one - which was about as stable as a house-of-cards - for a couple hours. It finally died, and we had no available Servers (the Server list was empty) for the rest of the night. They didn't give any details as to what the problem was, so I can't really say, but maybe it'll be a little more stable from this point on... sweatdrop
gataka You know, we could use the tech that detects specific words in posts to automate an answer to such repeat threads, a funny answer. Possibilities! :O Let's try something: "Marshall?" >.>
I like this idea, personally. I've always thought (and had these sorts of discussions with my few Gaian friends) that NPCs ought to be a little more active; unfortunately, unless there's a writer behind the keyboard, they're not allowed to post. However, using the same 'tech' you're talking about, here (what Odanodan used, no?) we could easily have various NPCs 'lurking' in various forums, automatically. I'd love it... whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:41 pm
Lazy-a** sprites. I guess they should've gone with pixies, after all. stressed
That is, the Servers are at it again... gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 4:54 pm
Red Kutai gataka You know, we could use the tech that detects specific words in posts to automate an answer to such repeat threads, a funny answer. Possibilities! :O Let's try something: "Marshall?" >.>
I like this idea, personally. I've always thought (and had these sorts of discussions with my few Gaian friends) that NPCs ought to be a little more active; unfortunately, unless there's a writer behind the keyboard, they're not allowed to post. However, using the same 'tech' you're talking about, here (what Odanodan used, no?) we could easily have various NPCs 'lurking' in various forums, automatically. I'd love it... whee
Yeah, Odanadodonadanadanodadadadan. "So I saw Landshark earlier---" "NOMNOMNOMNOMNOM" xD I've thought about such before, however it involved using chatbot tech, not Odanotech. That just crossed my mind as a weaker alternative. I also mainly had the Animated in mind: we don't expect them to be conherent, and maybe we could fight them off somehow. We're supposed to be at war. Dream big °3° I guess an ignore option would be possible for those who don't enjoy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:00 pm
gataka Red Kutai gataka You know, we could use the tech that detects specific words in posts to automate an answer to such repeat threads, a funny answer. Possibilities! :O Let's try something: "Marshall?" >.>
I like this idea, personally. I've always thought (and had these sorts of discussions with my few Gaian friends) that NPCs ought to be a little more active; unfortunately, unless there's a writer behind the keyboard, they're not allowed to post. However, using the same 'tech' you're talking about, here (what Odanodan used, no?) we could easily have various NPCs 'lurking' in various forums, automatically. I'd love it... whee
Yeah, Odanadodonadanadanodadadadan. "So I saw Landshark earlier---" "NOMNOMNOMNOMNOM" xD I've thought about that before, however it involved using chatbot tech, not Odanotech. That just crossed my mind as a weaker alternative. I also mainly had the Animated in mind: we don't expect them to be conherent, and maybe we could fight them off somehow. We're supposed to be at war. Dream big °3° I guess an ignore option would be possible for those who don't enjoy. only now did I realise it was sorta feasible.
Well, I still think the best option for normal Animated is as a Random Event (like the Magical Giftboxes) that 'drops' Orbs and (perhaps) loot. At least, most Animated - that Landshark bit is too good to pass up.
But you're right, it does sound completely feasible; and it's possible for all kinds of Forums outside this one, as well. Having Brennivin come in to 'rate' your avatar; having Ian and Louie stalking the Twilight forum; zOMG! has more unique NPCs than the mainsite, so we've got a few more options - but it could just as easily work everywhere...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:02 pm
gataka Red Kutai gataka You know, we could use the tech that detects specific words in posts to automate an answer to such repeat threads, a funny answer. Possibilities! :O Let's try something: "Marshall?" >.>
I like this idea, personally. I've always thought (and had these sorts of discussions with my few Gaian friends) that NPCs ought to be a little more active; unfortunately, unless there's a writer behind the keyboard, they're not allowed to post. However, using the same 'tech' you're talking about, here (what Odanodan used, no?) we could easily have various NPCs 'lurking' in various forums, automatically. I'd love it... whee
Yeah, Odanadodonadanadanodadadadan. "So I saw Landshark earlier---" "NOMNOMNOMNOMNOM" xD I've thought about such before, however it involved using chatbot tech, not Odanotech. That just crossed my mind as a weaker alternative. I also mainly had the Animated in mind: we don't expect them to be conherent, and maybe we could fight them off somehow. We're supposed to be at war. Dream big °3° I guess an ignore option would be possible for those who don't enjoy. No trixie? emo I'd stick with obvious stuff first like "Rings are soulbound because..." that only triggers if you use the following words: "How", "sell" and "ring"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:07 pm
Quintafeira12 gataka Red Kutai gataka You know, we could use the tech that detects specific words in posts to automate an answer to such repeat threads, a funny answer. Possibilities! :O Let's try something: "Marshall?" >.>
I like this idea, personally. I've always thought (and had these sorts of discussions with my few Gaian friends) that NPCs ought to be a little more active; unfortunately, unless there's a writer behind the keyboard, they're not allowed to post. However, using the same 'tech' you're talking about, here (what Odanodan used, no?) we could easily have various NPCs 'lurking' in various forums, automatically. I'd love it... whee
Yeah, Odanadodonadanadanodadadadan. "So I saw Landshark earlier---" "NOMNOMNOMNOMNOM" xD I've thought about such before, however it involved using chatbot tech, not Odanotech. That just crossed my mind as a weaker alternative. I also mainly had the Animated in mind: we don't expect them to be conherent, and maybe we could fight them off somehow. We're supposed to be at war. Dream big °3° I guess an ignore option would be possible for those who don't enjoy. No trixie? emo I'd stick with obvious stuff first like "Rings are soulbound because..." that only triggers if you use the following words: "How", "sell" and "ring"
Well, NPCs would need to respond in-character; Rings are soulbound because they are, not because of development concerns. They can explain that you would need to remove your soul to sell a soulbound item, but they can't give a proper explanation beyond that.
Of course, that's our job, eh? razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 5:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 3:42 pm
Ha! pirate
Don't act like I didn't call it... talk2hand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:42 pm
Red Kutai
Ha! pirate
Don't act like I didn't call it... talk2hand
you did! you did and I didn't believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
