|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:21 am
Roronoa-Forte: There's a three-strikes method in place for some of the rules. For sigs, they'll disable your sig twice, and if you violate the rules once more after that, they take it away permanently. I think it's fair, although I'm sorry you no longer have a sig. Why not make a new account and transfer all your gold and items over to the new account?
Aiko: I don't think it works unless the viewer has the same font installed on their computer. I just see little boxes. ^^;
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:23 am
Uhm... I guess it'll take a bit more thinking... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:23 am
Meriko Roronoa-Forte: There's a three-strikes method in place for some of the rules. For sigs, they'll disable your sig twice, and if you violate the rules once more after that, they take it away permanently. I think it's fair, although I'm sorry you no longer have a sig. Why not make a new account and transfer all your gold and items over to the new account?
Aiko: I don't think it works unless the viewer has the same font installed on their computer. I just see little boxes. ^^; And waste all 6000 posts that I worked hard to get on this account?! *melts to the ground and cries* Oh woe is me... crying "Just goes to show how this cruel, god-forsaken world can come up and bite you square in the a**." -Klunk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:28 am
I find it hard to believe that you were over by 40 pixels and they permabanned you for that alone. Although when it comes down to it, they woul have every right to. The restrictions are posted, it is your responsibility to check your sig before posting it on the site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:30 am
*types up a long PM to Cutie which is promptly eaten by a 404 error* Grahhhhh!
*waves to everyone*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:31 am
Meriko *clings to Nessy like a burr from now until April 18th* *pets the Meri-burr and cuddles her affectionately*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:31 am
*blinks*
where did i go?
aw kimi! >_<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:35 am
I once had my sig disabled on Lyoko for having the picture about... oh, say... 20 bytes. Note I didn't say kilobytes, I said just plain bytes. That's about 0.02 of a single kilobyte over the amount. >>;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:35 am
Cutie McHotpants I find it hard to believe that you were over by 40 pixels and they permabanned you for that alone. Although when it comes down to it, they woul have every right to. The restrictions are posted, it is your responsibility to check your sig before posting it on the site. Hmph. cry *needs someone to cling to* crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:38 am
I think the sig limits are EXTREMELY generous. Anyone who can't create a sig within those requirements deserves to have their sig disabled.
You can call me a hardass, but no other message board in the WORLD would tolerate 500x500 pixel sig images. As for file size...well why not be a complete jerk to people with dial-up? Keeping your sig WELL UNDER the requirements is part of being a good Gaian in my book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:39 am
Cutie McHotpants I think the sig limits are EXTREMELY generous. Anyone who can't create a sig within those requirements deserves to have their sig disabled. You can call me a hardass, but no other message board in the WORLD would tolerate 500x500 pixel sig images. As for file size...well why not be a complete jerk to people with dial-up? Keeping your sig WELL UNDER the requirements is part of being a good Gaian in my book. I can hold within the rules, but what really hurts me is I had no idea of a 3-strike limit in place. sad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:45 am
*waves back* =P Cutie McHotpants You can call me a hardass, but no other message board in the WORLD would tolerate 500x500 pixel sig images. As for file size...well why not be a complete jerk to people with dial-up? Keeping your sig WELL UNDER the requirements is part of being a good Gaian in my book. My sig is under 50kb, ...but I can't put in any more edits without random sig. xd <_< >_> Hardass. blaugh xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:50 am
Big signatures are a pain in the rear... one of my pastime occupations is reporting extra-large siggies domokun
.
.
.
Only joking, actually I only once report a really big one, over 700x700. I can see they're too large if they stretch the page, the others I don't even notice.
Perma-disabled? I had no idea... *double checks file size*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:50 am
Ahh...Meave had been warn once by a user. sweatdrop
stupid wishlist!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:53 am
Cutie: Actually, I'm on another board where there is no limit for the signatures. xD;
But the only reason I had a file size that big was because a friend of mine made me a banner in photoshop and because of how many colors were used, it just happened to be big in file size. I couldn't shrink it or reduce the number of colors myself, so I just never ended up using the picture.
*waves to Kimi*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
