Welcome to Gaia! ::

Agreed. That scene doesn't do much to show his transformed limitations.

Size has nothing to do with Gravity.

Lets look at a Balck Hole.
matter is so compact that a teaspoon of it has the mass of a small mountain

so no Gravity has noting to do with size.

No, I think he was right saying mass instead of density. If it had the same density, it wouldn't be any different than normal matter. (a single mountain has the same density as a whole mountain range, or several mountain ranges)

If it has the same mass as the mountain range in just a teaspoon of matter, then it's density is actually far larger.


However, assuming a planet isn't super dense (if it were, it would generally be incapable of supporting life), then size does matter.
...then again, planets in the afterlife might not have to be able to support life, or follow the normal rules of the living universe. So...whatever.

I dont think you give life anof credit. Bad spelling right now. Its 0317am. And I trying not to pass out. Think of the force in the deepist parts of the ocean, yet there is sea life there.
Life forms it self to live in there invirement. I make more sense after I go to bed and get some sleep.

Great idea. I'd love to see what you can come up with.

Okay, so after taking half an honors course on Physics, projectile motion, planetary motion, and coefficients of frictions- it is safe to say NONE of this stuff makes sense. At ALL!
I'm just re-reading a little bit- and size does matter, because of two very different, yet very similar formulas:

g = v^2 / r

gravity equals velocity squared divided by the radius (of the planet in question, basically the 'size')

and mainly

g = F / m

gravity equals Force (the weight of gravity on an object) divided by mass.

The first formula takes into accounts planets like Jupiter. You might say that although it is large, most of it's 'mass' is actually gaseous material. But that has no precedence over gravity. The first law takes into account the actual 'width' of the planet, whereas the radius of the planet's atmosphere is taken into account. In layman's terms: even if a planet is gaseous, or otherwise less dense, the gravity on the planet can still be lower. Except in special cases. (Black Holes)

The second equation sums it all up. Basically, if the MASS of the planet is greater (interchangeable with size in most cases), then the force of gravity on the object will be smaller. Because the higher the denominator gets, the 'lower' the fraction actually becomes. Like 1/4 is smaller than 1/2, and 1/2 is smaller than 1/1, etc.

Not sure where this falls in with all of the above, not sure if what I said furthers or hinders Goku's achievement yet either.

In any case, I've enjoyed dropping in. biggrin

You mean like:
E=MC^2...therefore...
THIS STUFF ISN'T REAL!!!

Nah. It's very real to me.
My Physics teacher gets on my nerves though. She uses problems with Superman, Batman, Flash, etc.
And I constantly argue with her disproving the problems.
Like she says Superman has to move from point X to point Y, both on Earth, what is the minimum amount of time he can achieve this in if his initial velocity is 100 miles per hour and the distance is 400 miles.
But Superman can move at Lightspeed, so he can technically accelerate to 186,000 miles per second and get there in no time at all.

This guild has scarred me for life. And perhaps ruined my chance of aceing Physics.