| When you were little, what did you picture yourself doing when you were older? |
| An actor/actress |
|
5% |
[ 2 ] |
| An artist |
|
12% |
[ 5 ] |
| A singer |
|
10% |
[ 4 ] |
| A ballerina |
|
5% |
[ 2 ] |
| An astronaut |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| A police man |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| A fireman |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Other |
|
64% |
[ 25 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:16 pm
Except for the minimal noise I don't think of it as necessary. Just more wastes of money.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:01 am
no kickback, minimal noise, a distance that can easily achieve 2+ miles at speeds faster than a bullet
hell it would make the American snipers job that much easier
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:16 pm
Right now, that is theoretical, like flying cars. For that kind of power, you'd need one hell of a charge, like 1.21 gigawatts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:37 am
Im pretty young at 16 years of age
I can wait another 20-30 years for those advancements to come.
speaking of which Iv been tinkering with the idea of.....lethal sound question
can Noise be weaponized to the point where it can kill a human
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:48 pm
People thought the same about flying cars, we don't have them either. Lethal, not likely, it can be harmful, but it be basically the vibration that would kill them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:03 am
yes but no were getting a LITTLE closer who knows what the future will hold.
enough to hemorage a spinal cord/brain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:30 pm
Darth Monkey speaking of which Iv been tinkering with the idea of.....lethal sound question can Noise be weaponized to the point where it can kill a human Sound is vibration transmitted through a solid, liquid, or gas. I see no reason why vibrations of a large magnitude can't be lethal. Earthquakes can basically be viewed as particular types of vibrations. We're also able to use specific frequencies of sounds to shatter glass. Theoretically all rigid materials have a particular frequency they're vulnerable to. You should look into the work of Tesla. In my opinion he's a higher caliber scientist than Edison. While Tesla was doing research on resonant frequencies he supposedly created a device that could create earthquakes. If Tesla really had succeeded in doing so then it's likely you could create a sound weapon that would shatter human bones, though you would have to use an unmanned apparatus to deploy it. Here's a brief synopsis of his experiment.Edit: sorry, I can't seem to get the quote feature to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:08 pm
Yeah, but to that same effect we can hope for transporter pods, just no reliable time frame when they'd come to be practical.
What I was talking about as a personal weapon. As a large scale, well, it'd be more a mad scientist weapon that would be eccentric. Really, it'd just be far more efficient to use a bomb, because setting up one would be hell just to have it destroyed by crumbling rubble.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:11 am
........I wanna start earthquakes
eeeeerrrg stressed advances in military technology wont come fast enough! and knowing 7 years isnt gunna help that much
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:15 am
I think they're going for things that are also cost effective too. Still developing new ways for safer recon...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:05 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:34 pm
So do something to that effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:26 am
POW!!! Confuseus got it. Also Rations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:00 am
Because they ain't tasty. You could try Grayskull recon tech, Mechaneck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
