|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:52 pm
emmfullness Crono725 I think it?s a grand religion. Full of nirvana and such. 3nodding Sure is. But, so is Hinduism. I guess that comes with originating from the same country, though. 15 But, Buddhism doesn't think that gods have anything to do with the abtainment of nirvana. Hinduism does. 16
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:53 pm
emmfullness Crono725 I think it?s a grand religion. Full of nirvana and such. 3nodding Sure is. But, so is Hinduism. I guess that comes with originating from the same country, though. 15 But I like the statues of the fat man, even if they aren't accurate. Fat men are so fun to be around.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:57 pm
emmfullness emmfullness Crono725 I think it?s a grand religion. Full of nirvana and such. 3nodding Sure is. But, so is Hinduism. I guess that comes with originating from the same country, though. 15 But, Buddhism doesn't think that gods have anything to do with the abtainment of nirvana. Hinduism does. 16 Buddhism believes in the devine nature of all forms of life. Therefore, all forms of life are connected to eachother and are all part of one supreme force. Upon the creation of Buddhism, this force would have been considered the god Atman (aht-mahn). Atman was "the All" of Hinduism. So, essentially, Buddhism took Atman and then left all the other Hindu gods and goddesses alone and ignored them as not important towards one's quest for enlightenment or "nirvana" since they were also the creation of Atman like everything else was. Buddha thought it better to go straight to the major source rather than work with the lesser gods or goddesses. 17
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:58 pm
Crono725 emmfullness Crono725 I think it?s a grand religion. Full of nirvana and such. 3nodding Sure is. But, so is Hinduism. I guess that comes with originating from the same country, though. 15 But I like the statues of the fat man, even if they aren't accurate. Fat men are so fun to be around. You'd love being around my dad! ^_^ lol 18
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:59 pm
You deny the poor girl a cool face?!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:59 pm
emmfullness Buddhism believes in the devine nature of all forms of life. Therefore, all forms of life are connected to eachother and are all part of one supreme force. Upon the creation of Buddhism, this force would have been considered the god Atman (aht-mahn). Atman was "the All" of Hinduism. So, essentially, Buddhism took Atman and then left all the other Hindu gods and goddesses alone and ignored them as not important towards one's quest for enlightenment or "nirvana" since they were also the creation of Atman like everything else was. Buddha thought it better to go straight to the major source rather than work with the lesser gods or goddesses. 17 I remember some of that from World History.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:00 pm
emmfullness emmfullness emmfullness Crono725 I think it?s a grand religion. Full of nirvana and such. 3nodding Sure is. But, so is Hinduism. I guess that comes with originating from the same country, though. 15 But, Buddhism doesn't think that gods have anything to do with the abtainment of nirvana. Hinduism does. 16 Buddhism believes in the devine nature of all forms of life. Therefore, all forms of life are connected to eachother and are all part of one supreme force. Upon the creation of Buddhism, this force would have been considered the god Atman (aht-mahn). Atman was "the All" of Hinduism. So, essentially, Buddhism took Atman and then left all the other Hindu gods and goddesses alone and ignored them as not important towards one's quest for enlightenment or "nirvana" since they were also the creation of Atman like everything else was. Buddha thought it better to go straight to the major source rather than work with the lesser gods or goddesses. 17 The thought that everything is of Atman is also why so many Buddhists are vegetarians. 3nodding 19
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:00 pm
shells_of_sand You deny the poor girl a cool face?! It was her 2nd post?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:01 pm
Crono725 emmfullness Buddhism believes in the devine nature of all forms of life. Therefore, all forms of life are connected to eachother and are all part of one supreme force. Upon the creation of Buddhism, this force would have been considered the god Atman (aht-mahn). Atman was "the All" of Hinduism. So, essentially, Buddhism took Atman and then left all the other Hindu gods and goddesses alone and ignored them as not important towards one's quest for enlightenment or "nirvana" since they were also the creation of Atman like everything else was. Buddha thought it better to go straight to the major source rather than work with the lesser gods or goddesses. 17 I remember some of that from World History. WOOT WORLD HISTORY!!! xd 20
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:01 pm
Crono725 shells_of_sand You deny the poor girl a cool face?! It was her 2nd post? it was my third, ********! gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:02 pm
emmfullness emmfullness emmfullness emmfullness Crono725 I think it?s a grand religion. Full of nirvana and such. 3nodding Sure is. But, so is Hinduism. I guess that comes with originating from the same country, though. 15 But, Buddhism doesn't think that gods have anything to do with the abtainment of nirvana. Hinduism does. 16 Buddhism believes in the devine nature of all forms of life. Therefore, all forms of life are connected to eachother and are all part of one supreme force. Upon the creation of Buddhism, this force would have been considered the god Atman (aht-mahn). Atman was "the All" of Hinduism. So, essentially, Buddhism took Atman and then left all the other Hindu gods and goddesses alone and ignored them as not important towards one's quest for enlightenment or "nirvana" since they were also the creation of Atman like everything else was. Buddha thought it better to go straight to the major source rather than work with the lesser gods or goddesses. 17 The thought that everything is of Atman is also why so many Buddhists are vegetarians. 3nodding 19 For some reason, I misspelled "divine" in that really long post. sad 21
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:03 pm
emmfullness emmfullness emmfullness emmfullness emmfullness Crono725 I think it?s a grand religion. Full of nirvana and such. 3nodding Sure is. But, so is Hinduism. I guess that comes with originating from the same country, though. 15 But, Buddhism doesn't think that gods have anything to do with the abtainment of nirvana. Hinduism does. 16 Buddhism believes in the devine nature of all forms of life. Therefore, all forms of life are connected to eachother and are all part of one supreme force. Upon the creation of Buddhism, this force would have been considered the god Atman (aht-mahn). Atman was "the All" of Hinduism. So, essentially, Buddhism took Atman and then left all the other Hindu gods and goddesses alone and ignored them as not important towards one's quest for enlightenment or "nirvana" since they were also the creation of Atman like everything else was. Buddha thought it better to go straight to the major source rather than work with the lesser gods or goddesses. 17 The thought that everything is of Atman is also why so many Buddhists are vegetarians. 3nodding 19 For some reason, I misspelled "divine" in that really long post. sad 21 That sucks. 22
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 8:04 pm
I should do some more research on Taoism.... 23
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|