|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:41 pm
Cale Darksun Nelowulf Good example. Better than mine... Gotta know animals. Dogs arent semisentinent. They're just really good at reading human emotions. They're not non-sentinent. Dream analasis has proven that. The only problem with dogs becoming higher ranked is they cant' tell the difference between dream and reality. Other than that major flaw, they could easily pass into low sentinence. But as with all psychology, the boundary lines are very wide and fuzzy. We know more what they aren't rather than what they are.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:43 pm
Nelowulf Cale Darksun Nelowulf Good example. Better than mine... Gotta know animals. Dogs arent semisentinent. They're just really good at reading human emotions. They're not non-sentinent. Dream analasis has proven that. The only problem with dogs becoming higher ranked is they cant' tell the difference between dream and reality. Other than that major flaw, they could easily pass into low sentinence. But as with all psychology, the boundary lines are very wide and fuzzy. We know more what they aren't rather than what they are. How can you tell that you're not dreaming? You could very well be dreaming but not aware of it and thus find yourself in the same situation of a dog, being unable to tell reality from fantasy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:45 pm
Cale Darksun Nelowulf Cale Darksun Nelowulf Good example. Better than mine... Gotta know animals. Dogs arent semisentinent. They're just really good at reading human emotions. They're not non-sentinent. Dream analasis has proven that. The only problem with dogs becoming higher ranked is they cant' tell the difference between dream and reality. Other than that major flaw, they could easily pass into low sentinence. But as with all psychology, the boundary lines are very wide and fuzzy. We know more what they aren't rather than what they are. How can you tell that you're not dreaming? You could very well be dreaming but not aware of it and thus find yourself in the same situation of a dog, being unable to tell reality from fantasy. That's not psychology though. That's philsophy, which has little impact on the discussion at hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:21 pm
On a side note, i have a theory.
The sith of the legacy era are somewhat like the Jedi of the Old Republic, short of the council. We have already known that Maladi leads the Inquisition and Torture department, while Wryyylock is public relations and a lorekeeper.
I was thinking that all Hunter Killer Jedi Teams (those sith who specifically hunt jedi) are under the tutleage of Stryfe. Sound interesting? PCs who are HKs would answer to stryfe, much like how Ferno answers (or at least in theory should answer to) Maladi.
Any takers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:28 pm
Ummm.....I'll kill Maladi? mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:14 pm
Nelowulf On a side note, i have a theory. The sith of the legacy era are somewhat like the Jedi of the Old Republic, short of the council. We have already known that Maladi leads the Inquisition and Torture department, while Wryyylock is public relations and a lorekeeper. I was thinking that all Hunter Killer Jedi Teams (those sith who specifically hunt jedi) are under the tutleage of Stryfe. Sound interesting? PCs who are HKs would answer to stryfe, much like how Ferno answers (or at least in theory should answer to) Maladi. Any takers? Makes sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:15 pm
I figure that with his build and his mentality, it would make sense...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:15 pm
Nelowulf I figure that with his build and his mentality, it would make sense... Theres precious little we know about Stryfe however.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:18 pm
At least until more data comes out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:19 pm
Same could be said about the fanon ships.
But we probably shouldn't go there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:21 pm
Nelowulf Same could be said about the fanon ships. But we probably shouldn't go there. We all know about the Fanon ships being just that. Fanon. They're just there to fill a gap in our knowledge so that we could move on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:22 pm
Of course, the entire RP is AU, so its not like any of it really matters.
No harm no foul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 11:26 pm
True.
And sounds g'd Nelo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 11:09 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
