|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 1:08 pm
blaugh I got spongebob stickers all over my face.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 3:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 5:05 pm
Razorh Yup, you make solid logic and I like the way you explained your picks. I agree that Cutting Klecko, Chatham, Don Davis, and Wesley Mallard is to trash some decent linebackers, I'm especially hesitant to see Klecko go, I like the intensity he brings. I absolutely hate your receiver depth chart. relying on David Terrell, bethel johnson and pk sam after your starters is playing with fire. If Terrell stinks and a starter gets hurt, you have no Troy Brown and no Tim Dwight. That said, I agree with a lot of your reasoning. Here's some difference of opinions, that you've already said to some, you'd be fine with: I like either Redman or Cassel as number 3 ahead of Davey. I'm not sure they'd risk losing Cassel the way they were talking about him, but they might. Then again, they might keep 4 QB's like Brady's rookire year, but I kinda doubt that one. I just want davey gone. I'm on an island believing Troy Brown is still gonna be our third receiver. God I hope I'm right ! Weaver over Fauria seems to make so much sense. I don't see us needing Mruczkowski. The rooks will be fine and coached up quickly. I want to see Ethan Kelley play a game or two before I start cutting quality players to keep him. I think both him and Mruc wouldn't get picked up if slashed. They could call them back if needed. I think our DLineman have enough versitility to do without a ton of backups. I'm just a little surprised Banta-Cain is beating out Klecko and Chatham. Not neccesarily disgreeing, just a little surprised. 1. I also WANT Davey gone, but I wanted him gone last year. 2. I share the concern with counting on Terrell, Johnson and Sam. But that is what TC and the preseason is all about. Dwight, Troy Brown or someone else still could be the #3 receiver if at least of of these guys doesn't step up. If the team had to be made up today, I would say Dwight would be a lock as you did; However, we are making predictions. 3. Both Weaver and Fauria are in the last year of their contract. Fauria is a much better player right now. He knows our system better, and he is better suited to start this year, which is all that matters for players in the last year of their contracts. 4. I don't know why you think that the OL's will get coached up quickly. Even the best OL's in the league have often taken a year to develop. With regard to Mrucz, I think he can play all the interior line positions, and relieves us of worrying about injuries. But I agree that this 9th OL spot is vulnerable. Most obviously, we might keep a 6th receiver/returner instead, as we did last year. I would note that we did keep 9 OL's last year. 5. Seven DL's is not a ton of backups. Our 34 2-gap is extremely punishing, expecially on the NT. 5 players are needed in the rotation in each game. To have two backups in case of injury is not too much. We've never kept fewer. I understand your concern about Kelly, but he's the best #7 we have, and probably as good as most team's #7. However, I'd be fine with signing a jag free agent instead. 6. Banta-Cain played well when he was in as an OLB (as did Chatham). Both are solid special team players. Banta-Cain is still a potential future starter or major contributer, and is signed through 2006. For me, Chatham has had his chance, and has been injured several times. Also, he is only signed through 2005. I'm fine if Chatham beats out Banta-Cain, but Tully would be a tough cut. This certainly could happen if Chatham is at 100%, and is viewed as a better STer than Banta-Cain. Klecko offers little this year. We would keep him in the expectation that he would start at ILB in 2006. I just don't see it. 7. The bottom line is that we have a very talented team. Upon further review, you are proabably right that Dwight should be considered the man to beat for a roster spot, especially if the spot can be cleared by curtting Mrucz.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 11:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 8:13 am
IndefiniteMatter Razorh Yup, you make solid logic and I like the way you explained your picks. I agree that Cutting Klecko, Chatham, Don Davis, and Wesley Mallard is to trash some decent linebackers, I'm especially hesitant to see Klecko go, I like the intensity he brings. I absolutely hate your receiver depth chart. relying on David Terrell, bethel johnson and pk sam after your starters is playing with fire. If Terrell stinks and a starter gets hurt, you have no Troy Brown and no Tim Dwight. That said, I agree with a lot of your reasoning. Here's some difference of opinions, that you've already said to some, you'd be fine with: I like either Redman or Cassel as number 3 ahead of Davey. I'm not sure they'd risk losing Cassel the way they were talking about him, but they might. Then again, they might keep 4 QB's like Brady's rookire year, but I kinda doubt that one. I just want davey gone. I'm on an island believing Troy Brown is still gonna be our third receiver. God I hope I'm right ! Weaver over Fauria seems to make so much sense. I don't see us needing Mruczkowski. The rooks will be fine and coached up quickly. I want to see Ethan Kelley play a game or two before I start cutting quality players to keep him. I think both him and Mruc wouldn't get picked up if slashed. They could call them back if needed. I think our DLineman have enough versitility to do without a ton of backups. I'm just a little surprised Banta-Cain is beating out Klecko and Chatham. Not neccesarily disgreeing, just a little surprised. 1. I also WANT Davey gone, but I wanted him gone last year. 2. I share the concern with counting on Terrell, Johnson and Sam. But that is what TC and the preseason is all about. Dwight, Troy Brown or someone else still could be the #3 receiver if at least of of these guys doesn't step up. If the team had to be made up today, I would say Dwight would be a lock as you did; However, we are making predictions. 3. Both Weaver and Fauria are in the last year of their contract. Fauria is a much better player right now. He knows our system better, and he is better suited to start this year, which is all that matters for players in the last year of their contracts. 4. I don't know why you think that the OL's will get coached up quickly. Even the best OL's in the league have often taken a year to develop. With regard to Mrucz, I think he can play all the interior line positions, and relieves us of worrying about injuries. But I agree that this 9th OL spot is vulnerable. Most obviously, we might keep a 6th receiver/returner instead, as we did last year. I would note that we did keep 9 OL's last year. 5. Seven DL's is not a ton of backups. Our 34 2-gap is extremely punishing, expecially on the NT. 5 players are needed in the rotation in each game. To have two backups in case of injury is not too much. We've never kept fewer. I understand your concern about Kelly, but he's the best #7 we have, and probably as good as most team's #7. However, I'd be fine with signing a jag free agent instead. 6. Banta-Cain played well when he was in as an OLB (as did Chatham). Both are solid special team players. Banta-Cain is still a potential future starter or major contributer, and is signed through 2006. For me, Chatham has had his chance, and has been injured several times. Also, he is only signed through 2005. I'm fine if Chatham beats out Banta-Cain, but Tully would be a tough cut. This certainly could happen if Chatham is at 100%, and is viewed as a better STer than Banta-Cain. Klecko offers little this year. We would keep him in the expectation that he would start at ILB in 2006. I just don't see it. 7. The bottom line is that we have a very talented team. Upon further review, you are proabably right that Dwight should be considered the man to beat for a roster spot, especially if the spot can be cleared by curtting Mrucz. Good feedback D, thanks. Couple of points - I think Weaver can play TE just as well as Fauria now. When Jed played last year he did very, very well. I think I like him better at this point. and I like his size. His age and salary also give him an edge. I think sometimes you look a little too much at when a player is signed through. With some of the fringe players, I think BB likes to take it year to year for a couple of reasons: 1) it keeps them hungry and motivated. They know it's produce or be gone. 2) if they decide to cut them, they keep the cap hit to a minimum. I don't think on a lot of these bubble roster choices it'll be decided based on their contracts but rather on what they think their current and future value is. Why do I think the OL will be coached up quickly? because I think dante does a great job. each year recently I've thought we were very thin at OL and was concerned with the talent level, and each year they've been just fine. we've lost mike compton, damien woody, gregg robinson-randall, etc. and we bring in guys nobody's heard of and we're fine if not better. Now we've spent a couple of pretty high draft picks on guys with some strong talent. I have doubt Dante will continue his magic. And even if it took a few games for the rooks to get there, we got enough good players for that to not hurt us, even without Mrucz. Just my opinion. I guess your right about training camp answering the wideout questions, just hope we sign troy for insurance. If not hopefully these signings will produce someone reliable. I'm pretty confident BB's planning on having Troy around though. See what your saying on Kelley, but for guys like him and Sam, there was more spots available for them to make it. We just drafted and signed a bunch of new guys. I think to assume they make it because they've made it before could be off. Do we have to have a 7th D-lineman? maybe. maybe not. If I could just see kelley play well, then I would be on board with carrying him, I've just never seen it, so I'm not sure the spot will be used on him. We certainly agree on the bottom line - a loaded roster and very few concerns. A lot of talent!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 8:17 am
And damn the Sox had to lose to those stupid Mariners, 14-7.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 8:27 am
Razorh And damn the Sox had to lose to those stupid Mariners, 14-7. It was a suck a** game. Gonzalez...Halama...your luck is going to run out. As I said, you can't keep relying on the scrubs. There is a point where they are going to pitch like the Tampa Bay rejects they are. Tonight they got exposed bad against a terrible team, albeit one that was due to break out at home. But now we might as well concede this game. Frankly, we probably did before it even started. Somebody wake up Lenny Dinardo and get him on the NESN jet out to the West Coast. On the return trip Cla Meredith will be headed back east in the fetal position. Seattle...Jody Jeremy Reed and Wiki Vandewegh Gonzalez, who are these guys?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 10:15 am
So... many... long... posts... brain... overloading... *dies*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 12:07 pm
Goldeye So... many... long... posts... brain... overloading... *dies* Least you're not related to 2 of them and dating the 3rd blaugh
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 1:16 pm
AKILLA As I said, you can't keep relying on the scrubs. There is a point where they are going to pitch like the Tampa Bay rejects they are. Tonight they got exposed bad against a terrible team, albeit one that was due to break out at home. But now we might as well concede this game. Frankly, we probably did before it even started. Well we can't all have Chen Men Wang and Sean Henn on our staff sweatdrop You spent your night whining about the 7 and 8 starters on the Red Sox. Amazing. AKILLA Somebody wake up Lenny Dinardo and get him on the NESN jet out to the West Coast. On the return trip Cla Meredith will be headed back east in the fetal position. Oh yeah, Halama and Gonzalez are trash, but that Lenny DiNardo sure is something special. AKILLA Seattle...Jody Jeremy Reed and Wiki Vandewegh Gonzalez, who are these guys? You don't know who Jeremy Reed is? What is going on around here lately?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 1:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 1:30 pm
HAILMARY! xd Glad to have Doug back. Looks like a nice jersey though I was thinking of him wearing #7. Then that would mean Redman would have to give up #7 by choice. Do you want my 1985 NJ Generals Doug Flutie jersey? Sell it to you for 198.00 or more. Nah I wouldn't sell it. I still got my Steven Hannah, Steve Grogan and Andre Tippet Patriots jerseys for the 80's and 70's. Go to the Pats proshop up there and look at the throwbacks.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 1:33 pm
Ally_Os Awesome idea red!
American Eagle-Awesome awesome store! They have really cute clothes, it's good quality and the prices are really reasonable. I seriously love that store.
Stitches-Yet another awesome store. Their clothes isn't as cute as American Eagle but it's still awesome. It too has good quality as well as reasonable prices. Plus they almost always have sales going on so it's awesome.
La Senza-Awesome store to get underwear from. They have so many styles and they have really cute patterns. Plus the prices are pretty reasonable and it's comfy underwear with minimal to no wedgies whee They have thongs too but I don't wear those...
Mariposa-I like their nicer stuff though their normal stuff is okay too. I hate their t shirts however since they're like the kind that show off your belly button and I hate those. They have some really cute skirts both long and short as well as cute tops and they've got reasonable prices.
Sirens-Generally I don't like the styling of most of their clothes but some of their clothes is cute and it's deffinately priced reasonabally.
Wal*mart-I hate wal*mart's clothes. Sure they may be styled like most teen stores but they're way cheaper. You may say that's good but it's poor quality which is bad.
Zellers-Deffinately better then wal*mart but still cheap clothes and cheap quality. Which is why I rarely shop there
Sears-They have cute bathing suits and cute pyjamas and sometimes their other clothes is cute but generally it's more like clothes for people who aren't teens.
Reitmans-Heh I used to shop there when I was little now I rarely go there since they only have kids clothes and then clothes that isn't really teenish so I tend to stay away from there.
That's all I can think about for now. I like Reitmans' button-downs. La Senza.. I haven't bought anything there yet. Maybe I should. *no wedgies are a good thing.*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:01 pm
Ally_Os Goldeye So... many... long... posts... brain... overloading... *dies* Least you're not related to 2 of them and dating the 3rd blaugh Yeah, there's that. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 3:21 pm
I was cleaning out my old stuff for garage sale it was hard parting with it. *sniffle* but its not garage sale day yet so I'm good biggrin
Garage is a cool store same with Bluenotes, american eagle has awesome t-shirts and stuff. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|