|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:42 pm
Sokoya Ramak 3,000,000 2,100,000 600,000 210,000 90,000. Fixed, Vin. Thanks.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:53 pm
I have a problem with Schrodinger's cat experiment.
I understand that if the nucleus in the apparatus decays, the cat will be poisoned and die, and that whether or not it decays is determined by "Quantum uncertainty."
However, in the period before observing the outcome it is said to be in "superposition." A state of both decay and not decay. Meaning the cat is both dead and not dead.
I don't know about you, but that sounds seriously ancient Egyptian.
|
 |
 |
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:17 pm
I wish my retard of a mother would hurry her a** up, and come pick me up from this hell hole.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:18 pm
Error: 1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. so it shouldn't be (money^2)^(1/2), but rather ( heart money^2)^(1/2) which would change the entire equation and disprove the point.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:25 pm
I dunno why you bitches cost money.
We should flip s**t around and have women buy every s**t for us.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:26 pm
I don't mind the dutch system.
=3
|
 |
 |
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:27 pm
So not true, as it based on false assumptions and logical fallacies. Even if you accept that money is evil, which it is not, then the time = money part of the equation would mean time itself is evil. So in order to argue this, you would need to build a case that time itself is evil.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:29 pm
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:32 pm
Seriously.
This is what you guys got from that post.
It's called a joke. You either laugh or you don't. You don't try to make it an intellectual debate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:40 pm
MerDefsGirl So not true, as it based on false assumptions and logical fallacies. Even if you accept that money is evil, which it is not, then the time = money part of the equation would mean time itself is evil. So in order to argue this, you would need to build a case that time itself is evil. You da ho. -fist pump-
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:41 pm
What?
It's not a joke. It's true.
If you don't believe me go ask you friend's non-abusive/good dad why his wife divorced him.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:42 pm
why? it's better than some of the other nonsense you people talk about here.
tentacle snake rape and all.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 5:49 pm
Did someone say tentacle rape?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|