|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:34 am
Wantcookie Cabron LaSwan Allegro Last Night's Votes: Glaru - 4 (Petrey, VDV, Dess, Swyff) Petrey - 1 (Allegro) No Lynch - 4 (Zahmen, Cabron, Rhed, Kuzo) CIs bolded. Hey STAG, why didn't you vote?
Cookie too. You were both here the whole time and neither of you were certain of the lynch.
I'd like to hear from both of you - your suspicions and your reasons for not acting. Wantcookie Well, I'm afraid I'm just not suspicious enough of anyone to vote for them to be put on the chopping block, but going without a lynch on the second day is inadvisable. I'm still convinced that Glaru is innocent, but there's no changing that now. We'd need something big to get a majority shift in votes. I think I'll abstain from voting unless I figure some things out. It might work better to watch for a little to see what people do, or to go back a few pages and reread a few things. Cabron LaSwan Yeah, I didn't like the idea of a no lynch either, but the lynch is our only weapon, and if we just sit back and let them use it against us we're ******** class="clear">
So who do you suspect now then? Or are you just gonna not be certain again and indirectly steer the lynch that way? I mean come on. It's bad enough when people don't even show up to vote - when they show up and don't, despite disagreeing with the lynch... well, if you're mafia, it makes sense that you wouldn't want to sabotage your team's efforts, but if you're town, I am so mad at you right now.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:45 am
-Dessynea- You aren't automatically working together just by talking to each other, I talked to Steffani yesterday for a while and mafia did not come up once, I talked to Amber on MSN the other night, the mafia did not come up. Zach and I have been dating for 4 1/2 years and we don't consider each other working together unless we actually are. And we live together and spend all of our time together, it is entirely possible to be in a relationship and not be in an alliance.
If you are working together, then you are in an alliance and that is something you choose do because you want to not because you are in a relationship.
Don't use your relationship as a an excuse for working together or not. Ummm, you defend Zach all the time, regardless of what team you're on, and you openly state it's because he's your boyfriend.
I'm guilty of it too. And I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but I can understand why they feel inclined to do it and I don't think it's fair to hold it against them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:48 am
I say I defend him, I also always say that we aren't in an alliance. I defend him because we are together, I don't "work with" him because we are together.
Do you see what I mean?
Zahmen is saying him and Petrey have to be working together because they talk. He is actually saying the exact opposite of what I always say. He says the are working together but he doesn't trust her, I say I trust him but we aren't working together.
What I do, is not what he is doing. Not every couple is working together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:54 am
The point I was trying to make is that they're going to want to help each other out, and it's not something that I think they should be told not to do if it makes the game more exciting for them, that's all.
I mean, fun's what we're all playing for, right? Regardless of side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:59 am
I am not saying they shouldn't help each other. I am saying if they are working together, which is totally fine because alliances are a huge part of this game anyway, then they chose to. The excuse that they are in a relationship and talk all the time and thus have to be working together is not one that I think is valid.
What I am saying is that they chose to work together, they didn't have to because they are dating.
All that being said, Petrey and I had lunch together today and I mentioned what Zahmen said to her and what I thought of it and she agreed. A relationship does not equal an alliance. She didn't say anything about whether or not they were in an alliance just that they wouldn't have to be just cause they are together.
I do play for fun, that's why nothing upsets me during games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:59 am
Cabron LaSwan The point I was trying to make is that they're going to want to help each other out, and it's not something that I think they should be told not to do if it makes the game more exciting for them, that's all.
I mean, fun's what we're all playing for, right? Regardless of side.  The enitre point of this site, your avatars, your loots, and everything you have ever done here, is for fun. Lady's got a point bros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:00 am
Cabron LaSwan Ummm, you defend Zach all the time, regardless of what team you're on, and you openly state it's because he's your boyfriend.
Don't call me by that name. Call me Wylr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:00 am
WOAH WOAH WOAH! HOLD IT! The Mafia GAME is supposed to be fun? Damn, I never knew.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:08 am
SoThatAznGirl Wantcookie -Dessynea- SoThatAznGirl Well. If someone presented an agreeable suspect, technically all of the no lynchers + abstainers could overtake the vote, but I don't think that many ppl are online right now.
You know what I love about mafia games, how even if you mention a suspect or don't, if you aren't the first person to vote for them then you are band-wagoning. Nope, you might have your own reasons, you might just not have voted for them yet, doesn't matter. You missed the chance to cast the first vote thus you are automatically incapable of unique thought. But if you're the first person to say anything, you're just trying to pin things on someone to get a lynch that isn't you so you can win as the mafia. xd
No, I think the point is that everyone who voted for Glaru should be responsible for the consequences. Is what I gather as a concensus, anyway.
Hello! Am only here for, like, 10 more minutes, and might be gone half of tonight, but I should be back before 10pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:12 am
Rhed King Cabron LaSwan The point I was trying to make is that they're going to want to help each other out, and it's not something that I think they should be told not to do if it makes the game more exciting for them, that's all.
I mean, fun's what we're all playing for, right? Regardless of side. The enitre point of this site, your avatars, your loots, and everything you have ever done here, is for fun. Lady's got a point bros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:13 am
Cabron LaSwan So who do you suspect now then? Or are you just gonna not be certain again and indirectly steer the lynch that way? I mean come on. It's bad enough when people don't even show up to vote - when they show up and don't, despite disagreeing with the lynch... well, if you're mafia, it makes sense that you wouldn't want to sabotage your team's efforts, but if you're town, I am so mad at you right now. i understand you would be mad at the people who didnt vote, me being one of them. as a townie it was the stupidest thing we could have done. i cant change that i didnt vote but i would like to explain why. i really didnt want to vote for haru because there was no real evidence against him.The only person who started to look guilty to me was kuzo because he kept pushing the lynch so hard even tho everyone kept saying there wasnt enough evidence. i was going to vote for kuzo just before end of day which is when i started to think it but then realized that i to have had a gut feeling about someone. i wasn't sure what to do and if i did a no lynch i was afraid that everyone would just say that i bandwagoned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:15 am
SoThatAznGirl SoThatAznGirl Wantcookie -Dessynea- SoThatAznGirl Well. If someone presented an agreeable suspect, technically all of the no lynchers + abstainers could overtake the vote, but I don't think that many ppl are online right now.
You know what I love about mafia games, how even if you mention a suspect or don't, if you aren't the first person to vote for them then you are band-wagoning. Nope, you might have your own reasons, you might just not have voted for them yet, doesn't matter. You missed the chance to cast the first vote thus you are automatically incapable of unique thought. But if you're the first person to say anything, you're just trying to pin things on someone to get a lynch that isn't you so you can win as the mafia. xd
No, I think the point is that everyone who voted for Glaru should be responsible for the consequences. Is what I gather as a concensus, anyway.
Hello! Am only here for, like, 10 more minutes, and might be gone half of tonight, but I should be back before 10pm.I disagree with that. I've been entertaining the possibility that the people who didn't vote despite thinking he was innocent simply wanted to avoid suspicion without screwing up the lynch for their team.
Specifically Cookie, since he just copy-and-pasted his last night's post without elaborating on his own suspicions or providing anything current whatsoever. I feel like he's trying to avoid attention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:16 am
Cabron LaSwan SoThatAznGirl SoThatAznGirl Wantcookie -Dessynea- SoThatAznGirl Well. If someone presented an agreeable suspect, technically all of the no lynchers + abstainers could overtake the vote, but I don't think that many ppl are online right now.
You know what I love about mafia games, how even if you mention a suspect or don't, if you aren't the first person to vote for them then you are band-wagoning. Nope, you might have your own reasons, you might just not have voted for them yet, doesn't matter. You missed the chance to cast the first vote thus you are automatically incapable of unique thought. But if you're the first person to say anything, you're just trying to pin things on someone to get a lynch that isn't you so you can win as the mafia. xd
No, I think the point is that everyone who voted for Glaru should be responsible for the consequences. Is what I gather as a concensus, anyway.
Hello! Am only here for, like, 10 more minutes, and might be gone half of tonight, but I should be back before 10pm.I disagree with that. I've been entertaining the possibility that the people who didn't vote despite thinking he was innocent simply wanted to avoid suspicion without screwing up the lynch for their team.
Specifically Cookie, since he just copy-and-pasted his last night's post without elaborating on his own suspicions or providing anything current whatsoever. I feel like he's trying to avoid attention. Uh, I just want to elaborate on the part I disagree with. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:20 am
lol, kay. Well, the Cookie suspicion makes sense. We'd have to put Amber in that group, too, because she didn't vote, was around enough to know what was up, and I don't remember seeing suspicions from her either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:24 am
Sweet Amber Lynne Cabron LaSwan So who do you suspect now then? Or are you just gonna not be certain again and indirectly steer the lynch that way? I mean come on. It's bad enough when people don't even show up to vote - when they show up and don't, despite disagreeing with the lynch... well, if you're mafia, it makes sense that you wouldn't want to sabotage your team's efforts, but if you're town, I am so mad at you right now. i understand you would be mad at the people who didnt vote, me being one of them. as a townie it was the stupidest thing we could have done. i cant change that i didnt vote but i would like to explain why. i really didnt want to vote for haru because there was no real evidence against him.The only person who started to look guilty to me was kuzo because he kept pushing the lynch so hard even tho everyone kept saying there wasnt enough evidence. i was going to vote for kuzo just before end of day which is when i started to think it but then realized that i to have had a gut feeling about someone. i wasn't sure what to do and if i did a no lynch i was afraid that everyone would just say that i bandwagoned It's true, you and STAG were both in the thread at the time he roleclaimed. One of you could have easily saved him by throwing a vote on No Lynch; neither of you did.
Now, you didn't post again after his roleclaim, so I can assume that you left. But STAG posted twice and still did not cast a vote. Dessy was also in the thread at the time of the roleclaim and did not change her vote.
Now, I'm not saying that it's impossible that you didn't believe him, but it's also possible that the death of the cop could have been a boon to either of you. I think it would have been too big a bluff to call for a cautious townie, and I'm suspicious of the fact that neither of you seemed to acknowledge it at all; kind of like you were hoping the lynch would go through silently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
