|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:39 pm
Camouflaged Exotic_Memories ther eis no prob for the original cross over of evolution, but there is proof that we did evolve from other species  Camo....l ... Just because some species resemble others in some ways doesn't mean they evolved to get that way...there are no 'missing links' connecting fossils to prove this...I don't know if they'll every find any...but as of yet...there are none...assumptions aren't proof...... l. Has Spoken... Actually, have you ever heard of a Pikea? anyways, i would be careful debating this, i just took a class which actually shows the proof of evolution
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:41 pm
Typhes Camouflaged Exotic_Memories ther eis no prob for the original cross over of evolution, but there is proof that we did evolve from other species Camo... .l ... Just because some species resemble others in some ways doesn't mean they evolved to get that way...there are no 'missing links' connecting fossils to prove this...I don't know if they'll every find any...but as of yet...there are none...assumptions aren't proof...... l. Has Spoken... The same can be said about Relegion, assumptions X really did say it best for once... its all faith in a way, its just what you choose to believe 3nodding I learned both were based on faith in school just the other day.
Wow, this paying attention stuff really helps! lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:41 pm
Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories ther eis no prob for the original cross over of evolution, but there is proof that we did evolve from other species Camo... .l ... Just because some species resemble others in some ways doesn't mean they evolved to get that way...there are no 'missing links' connecting fossils to prove this...I don't know if they'll every find any...but as of yet...there are none...assumptions aren't proof...... l. Has Spoken... Actually, have you ever heard of a Pikea? anyways, i would be careful debating this, i just took a class which actually shows the proof of evolution Camo... .l ...Funny...I just took a class disproving it...And a pikea was it's own species...the DNA is it's own....... l. Has Spoken...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:43 pm
Camouflaged Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories ther eis no prob for the original cross over of evolution, but there is proof that we did evolve from other species Camo... .l ... Just because some species resemble others in some ways doesn't mean they evolved to get that way...there are no 'missing links' connecting fossils to prove this...I don't know if they'll every find any...but as of yet...there are none...assumptions aren't proof...... l. Has Spoken... Actually, have you ever heard of a Pikea? anyways, i would be careful debating this, i just took a class which actually shows the proof of evolution Camo... .l ...Funny...I just took a class disproving it...And a pikea was it's own species...the DNA is it's own....... l. Has Spoken... What class did you take? and the pikea was the first vertabrae, its DNA is its own, but it is what all future vertabrae came from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:51 pm
Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories ther eis no prob for the original cross over of evolution, but there is proof that we did evolve from other species Camo... .l ... Just because some species resemble others in some ways doesn't mean they evolved to get that way...there are no 'missing links' connecting fossils to prove this...I don't know if they'll every find any...but as of yet...there are none...assumptions aren't proof...... l. Has Spoken... Actually, have you ever heard of a Pikea? anyways, i would be careful debating this, i just took a class which actually shows the proof of evolution Camo... .l ...Funny...I just took a class disproving it...And a pikea was it's own species...the DNA is it's own....... l. Has Spoken... What class did you take? and the pikea was the first vertabrae, its DNA is its own, but it is what all future vertabrae came from Camo... .l ... A teaching Professor Allen Vincent did @ our church...he used to be a darwinistic scientist and an Atheist...he had devoted his whole life to disproving the Bible...he discovered it was impossible...all speices were created within the first week...the fossil dating system is based on guesses...just because scientists find new fossils they try to pass them off as missing links...each species was it's own...God's creation was perfect from the start...... l. Has Spoken...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:53 pm
Camouflaged Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories ther eis no prob for the original cross over of evolution, but there is proof that we did evolve from other species Camo... .l ... Just because some species resemble others in some ways doesn't mean they evolved to get that way...there are no 'missing links' connecting fossils to prove this...I don't know if they'll every find any...but as of yet...there are none...assumptions aren't proof...... l. Has Spoken... Actually, have you ever heard of a Pikea? anyways, i would be careful debating this, i just took a class which actually shows the proof of evolution Camo... .l ...Funny...I just took a class disproving it...And a pikea was it's own species...the DNA is it's own....... l. Has Spoken... What class did you take? and the pikea was the first vertabrae, its DNA is its own, but it is what all future vertabrae came from Camo... .l ... A teaching Professor Allen Vincent did @ our church...he used to be a darwinistic scientist and an Atheist...he had devoted his whole life to disproving the Bible...he discovered it was impossible...all speices were created within the first week...the fossil dating system is based on guesses...just because scientists find new fossils they try to pass them off as missing links...each species was it's own...God's creation was perfect from the start...... l. Has Spoken... but that theory always states that the earth is only a few thousand years old. and carbon dating is highly accurate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:59 pm
Exotic_Memories but that theory always states that the earth is only a few thousand years old. and carbon dating is highly accurate And there are other questions to be asked as well but thats one always stuck in my mind
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:01 pm
Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories Camouflaged Exotic_Memories Actually, have you ever heard of a Pikea? anyways, i would be careful debating this, i just took a class which actually shows the proof of evolution Camo... .l ...Funny...I just took a class disproving it...And a pikea was it's own species...the DNA is it's own....... l. Has Spoken... What class did you take? and the pikea was the first vertabrae, its DNA is its own, but it is what all future vertabrae came from Camo... .l ... A teaching Professor Allen Vincent did @ our church...he used to be a darwinistic scientist and an Atheist...he had devoted his whole life to disproving the Bible...he discovered it was impossible...all speices were created within the first week...the fossil dating system is based on guesses...just because scientists find new fossils they try to pass them off as missing links...each species was it's own...God's creation was perfect from the start...... l. Has Spoken... but that theory always states that the earth is only a few thousand years old. and carbon dating is highly accurate Camo... .l ...Carbon dating isn't anything to go on....isn't it true they've discovered fossils that are supposed to be from one certain era in the same rock layers as species from another? That is fact...carbon dating is a a continuing cycle...one factor is based on another, that factor is based on another...etc. until the last factor has to be based on the first...Uniformitarianism is just trying to prove itself with it's own theories...... l. Has Spoken...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:03 pm
I'm not getting into this, like I said I wasn't.
Neither theory can be proved so for now... yeah. I'll stick with my rain ancestors. xd [just playing]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:04 pm
I'm gonna walk away from this debate, simply because i don't feel this is the time or place for it right now
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:04 pm
X, you know that we have the full right to blame this all on you now,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:05 pm
Camo... .l ...That's true...neither can be PROVED...but only one so far is impossible to DISPROVE...... l. Has Spoken...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:07 pm
Typhes X, you know that we have the full right to blame this all on you now,
No, it was Cabbage! gonk
He started it by saying I was a monkey!
I said, no, I'm rain! gonk
Then I asked your thoughts, and said I wont debate them!
And I havent!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:07 pm
Exotic_Memories I'm gonna walk away from this debate, simply because i don't feel this is the time or place for it right now Camo... .l ...I agree with that... 3nodding ...I don't critize anyone for what they do believe...but I will defend my own beliefs when they are in question...... l. Has Spoken...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 8:10 pm
yay for simple resolutions!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
