|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:25 pm
Sey Is it just me or is there something missing in the quickbar?
Is it just me, or is Sey missing panties?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:26 pm
Mmh... my edit button works.
razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:27 pm
The Darth Vizzle The points should always be secondary to the majority when it comes to this sort of judging panel style of doing things. If judges A and B score a fight 20 v 15, and then Judge C scores it 1 v 20, does it make any sense that the one incongruent judging should trump the majority simply because they decided to deliver a sizable point difference? The scores are just numerical representations of "win" or "lose." So two "wins" should still trump one "lose" even if that one "lose" warps the scoring significantly. Because the scores just explain the win/lose, yay/nay. They - like comments - provide the reasoning for it, a break down of the decision. To an extent, I agree on that. That's why I provided the fight winner for each of my scores. In fact, this judging would have gone a lot faster if we just went by "If two judges think this guy won, then they outweigh the third judge and we can move on". But noooooooooooooo...(pronounced "neeeeew") We had to do it by grading average. :/ Honestly though, grading by average is fine so long as people are using a similar scale. That way people aren't making dramatic dips in scoring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:29 pm
Good news everybody!
I got 500k for winning the first round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Female of the Species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:30 pm
The Darth Vizzle The points should always be secondary to the majority when it comes to this sort of judging panel style of doing things. If judges A and B score a fight 20 v 15, and then Judge C scores it 1 v 20, does it make any sense that the one incongruent judging should trump the majority simply because they decided to deliver a sizable point difference? The scores are just numerical representations of "win" or "lose." So two "wins" should still trump one "lose" even if that one "lose" warps the scoring significantly. Because the scores just explain the win/lose, yay/nay. They - like comments - provide the reasoning for it, a break down of the decision.
This.
It seems familiar. biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:33 pm
The Crossed Fox Lolli, if you don't mind me asking... are you sexually repressed at the moment? Over the course of these past few days, you've either been really IC in your OOC posts, or just really need to get laid.
Are you complaining we have people being IC as succubi?
Are you ******** kidding me? [Drags Crossed Fox towards a hidden room, the very same area where he killed Vintrict.] C'mere Naruto, looks like I'm gonna have to teach you a damned lesson again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:36 pm
i swear to god, if the MAC server for LoL comes out while i'm in finland, i'm going to kill a small child.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:38 pm
We worked that way last year in HoH.
Two judges > one judge. We'd still do the point breakdown, and if a team won by points but lost to majority, the majority was what mattered. Just like if we wanted to change a rule, if we had a 2 v 1 majority, then the rule would get changed.
Point averages are great and all, but they should be purely secondary to the judge majority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:39 pm
The Darth Vizzle We worked that way last year in HoH. Two judges > one judge. We'd still do the point breakdown, and if a team won by points but lost to majority, the majority was what mattered. Just like if we wanted to change a rule, if we had a 2 v 1 majority, then the rule would get changed. Point averages are great and all, but they should be purely secondary to the judge majority.
It's too difficult to put a point value on how someone performed, and each judge can interpret it differently. There are just too many extra variables that makes a point system unreliable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:40 pm
vodka sour i swear to god, if the MAC server for LoL comes out while i'm in finland, i'm going to kill a small child. It actually looks like they're waiting until season 1, because they're changing the format and the way the client works all together. It wouldn't make sense to change it for what they use now, then have to change it again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:40 pm
Not to mention Vodka, it's not a Mac server, just a Mac client. It'll connect to the same servers we do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:40 pm
The Time Wizard vodka sour i swear to god, if the MAC server for LoL comes out while i'm in finland, i'm going to kill a small child. It actually looks like they're waiting until season 1, because they're changing the format and the way the client works all together. It wouldn't make sense to change it for what they use now, then have to change it again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
