|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:19 am
Why yes we would, Foxy! I do believe that such a match would be extremely entertaining to say the least! EXHIBITION MATCH! Brought to you by.... GRAPPLE!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:26 am
Did someone mention...
...Grapple?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:35 am
OO! -evaporates- Bwahahahaha! -reappears seated on his head- xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:43 am
...My plan was full proof. How is this even possible?!
Kaybee, that's really, well... I don't even know the word for it. But, I'm sorry you lost against that guy, of all people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:47 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:48 am
Quiet, woman, go make me some lunch.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:49 am
Well, the reason for it I suspect will depend on which judge decided to give me a 16.
If it has anything to do with being limited to a single move or attack action when put into sunlight, I'm going to lmfao. Why? Because that entitles KB to a 30ft move, instead of a 20ft move.
But, y'know, it's not like we're playing by D&D rules anyway. I just don't like being told I'm being docked points for getting out of the sun creatively, simply because the profile THEY APPROVED has the utility to do so... I mean hell ya its cheap that he can do that s**t, but I'm not the one who accepted the profile and didn't foresee that kind of s**t.
If it's just like, writing and s**t, then I'm cool with it. I still think its FISHY that two Judges thought I was winning and the other mistook me for Acropolis, but, what can I really do about it?
I can open up a loser's bracket, THAT'S WHAT I CAN DO. mad
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:51 am
If two judges thought you won, then you should have won.
The opinion of TWO judges > one judge. It should never come down to where one judge can overrule the opinion of the other two by making a large point difference.
It makes no sense for 2/3 judges to say "Fighter A won" and then 1/3 of the panel to go "Fighter B won"... and then have that 1/3 minority overrule the majority's judgment.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:53 am
As disappointed as I am I lost, I'm at the same time happy my first round wasn't filled with faggotry. In fact, it was the most heterosexual first round of them all. (Pose.)
However, this shan't be the last time Omi appears this year's GTB.
Hoh, not at all.
Not even close.
[Rubs hands together.]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:55 am
Well see, that's my issue with my score. I completely understand if they want to say Iden was the better fighter, because he did a really good job. The scores were pretty close, so I wouldn't be surprised if he won by a point or two. What I have though, is,
KB vs. Iden
24 + 16 + 23.1 = 63.1
21. 5 + 21 + 22.9 = 65.4
Winner: Iden
Where I have like... a what, 2.7 point advantage on what I consider the fairly normal judging. I'm not saying I should win by virtue of that alone, just that... one guy deciding I suck and giving me a 16 vs 21 seems really, really gay.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:56 am
..Yeah, that is pretty damn lame, I'll actually vouch for that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|