|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:23 pm
Welcome! and if you don't want to change your name I can always invite your active account and remove this one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 10:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:46 am
Really? That would be great! My other name is VampiresDontSparkle. Thank you!!! Tak-Jak Welcome! and if you don't want to change your name I can always invite your active account and remove this one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:22 pm
sanity isan illusion
Thank you guys for the welcomes. Please, ignore BookWyrm217, I'll be on this name from now on. I wasn't even thinking when I signed up for the guild which name I was under at the time.
created by the truly insane
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:49 pm
But....but vampires do sparkle. crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 3:58 pm
Hiya! Although I have to disagree. Vampires don't sparkle. They burnish. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 5:59 pm
I'm sorry, but vampires don't sparkle. I also think that Meyer's is a hack. Sorry, just my opinions.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:03 pm
Just like "JK Rowling is the greatest novelist of our time!!" >_______>
Go to Youtube and type in 'I'd like to have been in that meaning harry potter.' Yeah, I totally agree with everything in there. stare
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:22 pm
Ser, we need linkage. Are you for or against HP?
And Vampires. ********'. Sparkle. I don't care what anyone says, Meyers turned an old horror story/legend into something believable and beautiful, and no one else can do it like she did. Most vampire stories, you know, only popped up after Twilight; before that there was only like, Anne Rice and Dracula and Carmella (lesbian vampires, apparently inspired Dracula). It's PERFECTLY FINE for someone to write that book, and I love it.
Just throwing that out there. It's my job to antagonize. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:53 pm
I did not like Twilight. I don't like perfect things, and while having to constantly restrain one's self from sucking sapient beings's blood at every passing moment would be a flaw in the real world, Meyer failed to make it so in her novels, to be honest, so that category includes her vampires. I don't care about the sparkling, because honestly, there are so many better things about her stuff to poke. xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:58 pm
I am against the last 3.5 books of Harry Potter. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWCYDaZHl6QAnd Twilight was very good. I read it well over ten times. But it's far too overrated, and people are much too obsessed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 8:07 pm
Ack! No antagonizing to like major debating.
Go make a thread! I can't have this place explode while captain is away.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|