|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:45 pm
[ KB ] -Yawn-
I'm going to have to have a discussion with everyone OOC who decides to side with KB and the like IC, in the future sometime after the Gala. It will be regarding the outcome of the battle to take place at the CITADEL, whether TJ decides to respond ICly or not. The outcome will be decided and roleplayed accordingly. I won't be forcing anyone to agree with anything IC or OOC, but I'll strongly encourage following whatever end comes out of it.
Until then, I have to be going. I'll elaborate further later. 3nodding God-damn Cradle, always typing it by mistake. sweatdrop The quoted post can be disregarded, as there will be no battle at the citadel. The battle will take place in a level playing field.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:47 pm
*Disregards Mastema's post*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:48 pm
Jim Hensley *Disregards Mastema's post* Good technicality point. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:49 pm
*Disregard's Mastema's quote of KB's plan to decimate the Citadel*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:50 pm
Jim Hensley *Disregard's Mastema's quote of KB's plan to decimate the Citadel* Your loss. *pats*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:51 pm
Not really. I'm on KB's side, and unless you plan on flinging a GM barrier up you're essentially screwed side ways, running.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:53 pm
Jim Hensley Not really. I'm on KB's side, and unless you plan on flinging a GM barrier up you're essentially screwed side ways, running. The citadel currently has the most GMed character this guild has ever seen guarding it. It makes no sense to try and have a guildwide battle there until the unit leaves. Therefore it's likely in the best interest of the guild to have such a large scale battle somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:54 pm
That wouldn't be me perchance? sweatdrop I could see how it could be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:56 pm
Marksman in the Chaos That wouldn't be me perchance? sweatdrop I could see how it could be. *pat* No, no. I meant the fifth Vanguard unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:57 pm
Okay, thats reassuring. Anywho, so I don't GM any more than I already have, Ive finished my characters story. Heh heh, it turned out pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:58 pm
The 5V is an annoyance. GMing seems to be your specialty, doesn't it Mastema?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:59 pm
Orias: He OBVIOUSLY meant me...seeing as how I'm so powerful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:01 pm
Jim Hensley The 5V is an annoyance. GMing seems to be your specialty, doesn't it Mastema? V5 was designed to play a part in the plot of the break the world. For it to play out, I needed to use a character of such immense power. I don't plan to use him against anyone IC. So start thinking straight and see how much better it would be to have a massive battle elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:04 pm
*Shrugs and chooses to ignore Mastema's idiocy*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:08 pm
Jim Hensley *Shrugs and chooses to ignore Mastema's idiocy* You're the one choosing not to see how much of a bad idea it would be to have a battle at the citadel. If I'm really as much of a god modder as you say, the you only have yourself to blame for putting up such a ridiculous idea to have a battle at my thread. So, if you want to go along with what I think the spirit of KB's plan is, reconsider your options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
