|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:04 pm
I'm curious as to how EK gets authority to move fleets not under his control, and on top of it, fail to read my posts before suggest I don't read his.
It's kinda hypocritical to simply whine and moan about how nobody reads a post, yet they themselves don't do it. It makes me want to just simply ignore them even more.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:08 pm
PaulTheWolf5575 Cale: Good term... Stellar and EK: I have yet to add my two cents...I'm thinking that taking a large amount of smaller vessels would behoove the GLF a great deal, but if we can manage something bigger it would be nice... Everyone needs to stop thinking about taking the biggest and most armed ship available. It's fine if you can steal a couple of those ships, but don't be thinking that you need a fleet of those big ships that you want Paul. The idea is to keep it small and mobile if your facing an opponent that over matches you in strength.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:09 pm
Myself, I say let's focus on storytelling first and foremost, and not worry about number crunching at this time, yah?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:12 pm
Good luck with that one. I imagine this is just going to be a big balls contest again, because short of stellar, I doubt the "commanders" can think outside a battle involving capital ships..
i still need a fleshy PC to perform a Fatality on...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:13 pm
Once again. Glad to be a smuggler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:15 pm
Nelowulf Good luck with that one. I imagine this is just going to be a big balls contest again, because short of stellar, I doubt the "commanders" can think outside a battle involving capital ships.. i still need a fleshy PC to perform a Fatality on... If Iust ever redeems himself I will think about letting you rip him apart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:17 pm
Yeah, but I'd be better to do it on one of the people with like, 3 PCs or something. Trim the fat, let's say.
Plus, I have to hire Iust before he can redeem himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:18 pm
Nelowulf Yeah, but I'd be better to do it on one of the people with like, 3 PCs or something. Trim the fat, let's say. Plus, I have to hire Iust before he can redeem himself. True, but it never hurts working out for the way long term (as oppossed to just the long term)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:20 pm
I'm just going to wonder when the bad guys get another permanent hand. I mean, more and more are going good... time to cap the limit before its really overflowing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:22 pm
There has to be a way to get more bad guys in the Rp. Bribes maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:29 pm
Just tell anyone wanting a new character if it ain't evil, its snuffed.
Or, the balancing act of killing off good guys could also occur, but the people with multiple good guys are probably not going to want to give them up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:34 pm
I've got two neutrals and a neutral evil... Nothing to kill here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:35 pm
Like I said the minute Iust becomes good (sort of) I will give you the go ahead to kill him off. (After the mandatory redemption, of course)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:58 pm
Johnny Malone Like I said the minute Iust becomes good (sort of) I will give you the go ahead to kill him off. (After the mandatory redemption, of course) You really are an a*****e to Iust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 10:05 pm
Ral Roke Johnny Malone Like I said the minute Iust becomes good (sort of) I will give you the go ahead to kill him off. (After the mandatory redemption, of course) You really are an a*****e to Iust. Yeah I am , I like the tragic hero, always have, always will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
