Welcome to Gaia! ::

And at this.

I don't get to have fun right now because my opponent's like "AHW HANK HILL GEE GEE" and won't fight me.

All I've got to do is read other people fighting, and argue with Vintrict while he's high on kwayludes.

I just.. wanna go Super Saiyan, is that.. so.. wrong?

Vintrict, you don't know what an "experienced opponent" is, to begin listing your problems. And you fall onto the argument of everything being relative to justify your viewpoints without any tangible examples, making debating with you an exercise in futility.

You probably didn't see it because it was over at Sigil, but the "that's just your opinion" argument is terrible, like if someone at Krogers started shoving Oscar Meyer Wieners in their butthole and when you looked at them dumbstruck by what the ******** they're doing, they snap at you "THAT'S JUST YOUR OPINION. I LIKE THIS."

That's very nice, it's not a fitting argument. It's not:

-Legal. Cops'll arrest you for shoving hotdogs in your buttocks in public.
-Moral. Children don't want to see your hotdogs in your butt.
-Efficient. Eating the hotdog'll, scientifically proven, yield you more energy than putting it in your a**.
-Safe. Cold, uncooked Krogers meat in your raw a*****e could give you all kinds of illnesses.

And so on. You may then retort "THAT'S JUST WHAT YOU THINK" but, no, it's really the common observation. Common not in quality but in frequency, and backed based on such a large quantity of circumstantial and subjective evidence that it stops being circumstantial and subjective.

There will be times where we are "correct" and the masses are "wrong," yes. But this will not always occur. Nor is it even in the majority of times. If you find yourself coming to blows with others in your heartfelt opinions all the time, chances are high your stance is flawed at best, and at worst, absolutely wrong.

Absolutely "porked" by the bun length frank wieners.

More like I run into a bunch of ignorant people commonly to make those points stand out more. Then again, there's a lot of uninformed people on this board to begin with.

It's easy to claim those we disagree with are uninformed or ignorant, because then we feel more elevated in our own viewpoint. The "Knock Them Down" mentality, where in your head, you focus more on reducing the worth of your opposition so it leaves your viewpoint stronger no matter what fallacies it houses.

Like if you Vintrict, an 8 pack of wieners in your butt, strutted over to Tres' house and went "..Tres doesn't have a Nintendo system. And his house is shitty. That must mean he's wrong about my buttdogs and I'm right."

Trolling is often the same as being factually incorrect.

So I guess you were in fact successful, I guess in the same way vintrict Is often successful in riling me and everyone else up.

I don't know how I feel about Hael's portrayal of Hank.

Some things he has spot on, but I don't think he'd care about getting his jeans dirty and Peggy being mad about it because he's about to go do "Man's work." Like if someone randomly asked him to chop down a tree in the mud then he'd probably wear those mud stains as a badge of "I just did some s**t."

And I also think "Damn it, Dale." would be appropriate than "That boy ain't right."

Also would have been +10 comedy if Bill would have somehow tapped into Dale's telepathy because Bill is 1000% more annoying. Even then, Hank is such a skeptic when it comes to Dale's schemes that I doubt he would have taken the telepathy thing so easily.

Just based off of that, the other guy has nothing to fear. Hael's already lost the match before it started.

You're right actually, this isn't a 100% accurate Hank Hill.

But I won't reveal why not just yet.

That'll come up in the [PLOT].

Wow.... And you just made yourself sound like a condescending a**...

Congrats hun. biggrin