|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:09 pm
Dukes Padme Potter of Hobbiton Surrecrux Padme Potter of Hobbiton
But who's said that's the foundation of the game? I haven't seen it anywhere.
What if I disagree and don't think that's the foundation of the game? What if I think it's something different?
It's not an opinion, nor is it something that can be debated upon. If somebody has absolute proof of another person's role, the trust and suspicion aspect of the game is completely taken away. I really can't put it any simpler.
And no offense, but as somebody who's been playing a lot longer than myself, I seriously hoped you'd understand how the game works by now. o_o
.....
So, it doesn't take everything away. The person with a role now just has one other person who knows. So? That happens every game. It's not a big deal. There's still a desicion on who to trust. Still the suspicion of whether you can trust who you let see. It's just different.
How the game is played is an opinion.
I play the game differently than others.
Everyone plays the game differently.
Estellio Estel  So Padme... why don't we just get rid of the no screenshotting PMs rule as well then? Because I don't make the rules.
I don't know, ask Zae. Estellio Estel
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:20 am
You can interpret the game how you like, but you still fail to see my point. With that kind of evidence in hand, somebody could make or break the game for another person. Let's say you're the newsreporter, and I'm in an alliance with the sniper. You give me access to your account, and I check your inbox, only to find absolute proof of your role.
The sniper would ultimately kill you in that situation, but see, if I were to do that, I'd be unfairly taking an important aspect out of the game - clues. That's, as I said, not an opinion, nor is it something debatable. It's fact.
This is why giving people permission shouldn't be allowed. And because I've explained this far too many times already, I'm going to refrain from posting here any further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:45 pm
Surrecrux You can interpret the game how you like, but you still fail to see my point. With that kind of evidence in hand, somebody could make or break the game for another person. Let's say you're the newsreporter, and I'm in an alliance with the sniper. You give me access to your account, and I check your inbox, only to find absolute proof of your role.
The sniper would ultimately kill you in that situation, but see, if I were to do that, I'd be unfairly taking an important aspect out of the game - clues. That's, as I said, not an opinion, nor is it something debatable. It's fact.
This is why giving people permission shouldn't be allowed. And because I've explained this far too many times already, I'm going to refrain from posting here any further. I completely agree with this... The PM's are only for notification purposes, in my opinion. Hence the no Screen-caps or anything to reveal it. Knowing FOR SURE what someone's position is takes out the whole trust aspect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:08 pm
I love how people think I'm stupid because my opinion doesn't match up with theirs. heart Estellio Estel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:09 pm
///+ Buzz Bro... +///
basically it's not fair for a person to log onto somebody else's account and then tel other people and cause that person to lose, just because they trusted you enough to let you have their password xp
///+ ...Blue+///
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:51 pm
buzzkid24
///+ Buzz Bro... +///
basically it's not fair for a person to log onto somebody else's account and then tel other people and cause that person to lose, just because they trusted you enough to let you have their password xp
///+ ...Blue+///Since when has fairness been a rule?
Besides, there's an easy way to prevent it. Don't give out your password. Estellio Estel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:48 pm
Padme Potter of Hobbiton buzzkid24
///+ Buzz Bro... +///
basically it's not fair for a person to log onto somebody else's account and then tel other people and cause that person to lose, just because they trusted you enough to let you have their password xp
///+ ...Blue+///Since when has fairness been a rule?
Besides, there's an easy way to prevent it. Don't give out your password. Estellio Estel
If the game is tipped against someone because of outside influence, like looking into an inbox, people on the whole just agree that that isn't fair. You have a point that you shouldn't give out your password, but that should generally be a given
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:09 pm
 Update. Sights Set On Tommorow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
