|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:47 pm
Maybe it would be better if we got back on the topic of the voting rule changes.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:49 pm
Dude, we've been on topic.
Everything is relevent to the current discussion.
HirunHikari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:51 pm
HirunHikari Dude, we've been on topic.
Everything is relevent to the current discussion.
HirunHikari
Mori Bokusochi I'd rather no one be bitchy. Please stop this argument before it gets worse. I stand by my previous statement...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:54 pm
Merumiharu Not really ALL NEW rules. Just clarifying old ones and tweaking NONE OF THIS IS SET IN STONE.
Current Rule4. The Game Master will not wait for everyone to vote. At the deadline, he or she will move on to the next round. If a secret character misses their turn, He or she will use a random number generator. Revisions:None
Current Rule:9. If you feel you cannot make a decent descision on whom to vote for, or do not have time, or whatever reason, you may vote with a PASS. HOWEVER. You may NOT pass more than three times in the game. The POINT in the game is to be forced to vote. If you exceed your three passes, you will be removed due to inactivity without warning. Revisions:ENFORCE THIS PLZ Current Rule:10. Once you have been shot/jailed, you MAY contine to post and speculate and whatnot, but you MAY NOT vote. Revisions:How about adding "You cannot vote for someone who is in jail or inactive or it will count as a pass"? Current Rule:13. If you miss three rounds in a row, or five rounds total, you will be removed. NO EXCUSES. Sorry. I and the GM cannot count absences and allow for vacations and such. I am sorry. It's too much work for me or them, and not fair to the other players. (If the current GM wants to change this rule, they may. However, default is no excuses. n.n) Revisions:OH SNAP HOW ABOUT ENFORCING THIS RULE? You go inactive. DEAL! Or at least inform the tallier ME when allowing someone back in the game. KK GM?!?!?!??? Suggestions?
Okay, first off, #4. I see no problems with the rule. If they don't make it, they don't make it.
Number 9 can be revised to add that voting for yourself or voting jailed or inactive. Not number 10. 10 is different.
10 requires nothing new.
13 should thus forth state that if one misses the rounds they go inactive. Should they go inactive with a good reason, such as camping against will or unable to ask a trustworthy friend, they should debate such with GM and the decision will be made from there. No hassle from any peanut gallery. The GM has the sole choice to allow the person into his/her round, not the people who like to complain other people in the game.
And about your side note about the tallier, this is where you can clearly see why everyone's getting pissed off at you. You're ATTACKING said GM for not informing you, rather than politely asking for information. That's why I'm so annoyed with you. >_>
HirunHikari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:54 pm
dfgcgvhjkfjihbnikjokijhgvfhjklgdshbjklfs
WE NEED ENFORCED RULES
Hows that for ontopic and not bitchy everyone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:57 pm
Merumiharu dfgcgvhjkfjihbnikjokijhgvfhjklgdshbjklfs WE NEED ENFORCED RULES Hows that for ontopic and not bitchy everyone?
...That's REALLY not helping a bit.
@Taro: The arguement itself was on topic. The anger management required for some is another story.
@Meru (again): Care to pick apart my suggestions?
HirunHikari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:59 pm
No fighting, please? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:00 pm
InternalHardDrive No fighting, please? sweatdrop Reiterated. Debating is fine, but fighting and attacking another is not. This is not directed at any one person, but everyone in this thread. Alright?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:03 pm
Mori Bokusochi InternalHardDrive No fighting, please? sweatdrop Reiterated. Debating is fine, but fighting and attacking another is not. This is not directed at any one person, but everyone in this thread. Alright?
This is fine. Should I outburst any further, I will leave.
HirunHikari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:08 pm
Mori Bokusochi InternalHardDrive No fighting, please? sweatdrop Reiterated. Debating is fine, but fighting and attacking another is not. This is not directed at any one person, but everyone in this thread. Alright?  O.o
Some of us did nothing! D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:10 pm
Dukes Mori Bokusochi InternalHardDrive No fighting, please? sweatdrop Reiterated. Debating is fine, but fighting and attacking another is not. This is not directed at any one person, but everyone in this thread. Alright? O.o
Some of us did nothing! D: In that case, continue to do nothing. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:16 pm
Dukes ...
Rule 4. - Good as-is.
Rule 9. - Are you counting self-votes as passes or just passes?
Rule 10. - With jailvoting... isn't it a bit obsolete anyhow? Perhaps replacing this rule with "Voting for an inactive, deceased or imprisoned person will result in your vote being considered a pass and will count against your game maximum of three passes."
Rule 13. - Maybe we should modify this; something along these lines:
"If you are inactive for three consecutive rounds or a cumulative total of five rounds, you will be removed from the game. Exceptions may be made if prior notice is given or your inability to get on is demonstrated to the GM's satisfaction. Exceptions are subject to the GM's discretion."
9- Counting self voting as a pass 10 - What? Thats what I said... 13. Isnt that what it says? HirunHikari
Okay, first off, #4. I see no problems with the rule. If they don't make it, they don't make it.
Number 9 can be revised to add that voting for yourself or voting jailed or inactive. Not number 10. 10 is different.
10 requires nothing new.
13 should thus forth state that if one misses the rounds they go inactive. Should they go inactive with a good reason, such as camping against will or unable to ask a trustworthy friend, they should debate such with GM and the decision will be made from there. No hassle from any peanut gallery. The GM has the sole choice to allow the person into his/her round, not the people who like to complain other people in the game.
HirunHikari
4. TY 9. TY 10. TY 13. Thats what it says. But the GM should announce if the are letting people do that at the beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:19 pm
Merumiharu Dukes ...
Rule 4. - Good as-is.
Rule 9. - Are you counting self-votes as passes or just passes?
Rule 10. - With jailvoting... isn't it a bit obsolete anyhow? Perhaps replacing this rule with "Voting for an inactive, deceased or imprisoned person will result in your vote being considered a pass and will count against your game maximum of three passes."
Rule 13. - Maybe we should modify this; something along these lines:
"If you are inactive for three consecutive rounds or a cumulative total of five rounds, you will be removed from the game. Exceptions may be made if prior notice is given or your inability to get on is demonstrated to the GM's satisfaction. Exceptions are subject to the GM's discretion."
9- Counting self voting as a pass 10 - What? Thats what I said... 13. Isnt that what it says? HirunHikari
Okay, first off, #4. I see no problems with the rule. If they don't make it, they don't make it.
Number 9 can be revised to add that voting for yourself or voting jailed or inactive. Not number 10. 10 is different.
10 requires nothing new.
13 should thus forth state that if one misses the rounds they go inactive. Should they go inactive with a good reason, such as camping against will or unable to ask a trustworthy friend, they should debate such with GM and the decision will be made from there. No hassle from any peanut gallery. The GM has the sole choice to allow the person into his/her round, not the people who like to complain other people in the game.
HirunHikari
4. TY 9. TY 10. TY 13. Thats what it says. But the GM should announce if the are letting people do that at the beginning. I agree with your thoughts about #13, and I in fact did. Back at the start of the game, in the "Rules about game X" thread, I made it clear that people could ask about being let back in. It's a good thing to let people know about in the case that people wish to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:20 pm
Merumiharu 13. Thats what it says. But the GM should announce if the are letting people do that at the beginning.
Okay, how would the GM know to expect someone to go on vacation to renew them if say... they had to go starting Day 2 and arrive back Day 5? I say that the GM should not state at all that they will be restricting such unless they are positive they want the people to stay gone if they leave to avoid hassle.
If the GM choses to let them back in, then it is up to them to deal with it and make the arrangements to uninactive them. This can be done by talking with the tallier and possibly saying... oh, if they jumped off a cliff due to inactivity... they recover in a hospital or something.
HirunHikari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:21 pm
Merumiharu Dukes ...
Rule 4. - Good as-is.
Rule 9. - Are you counting self-votes as passes or just passes?
Rule 10. - With jailvoting... isn't it a bit obsolete anyhow? Perhaps replacing this rule with "Voting for an inactive, deceased or imprisoned person will result in your vote being considered a pass and will count against your game maximum of three passes."
Rule 13. - Maybe we should modify this; something along these lines:
"If you are inactive for three consecutive rounds or a cumulative total of five rounds, you will be removed from the game. Exceptions may be made if prior notice is given or your inability to get on is demonstrated to the GM's satisfaction. Exceptions are subject to the GM's discretion."
9- Counting self voting as a pass 10 - What? Thats what I said... 13. Isnt that what it says? HirunHikari
Okay, first off, #4. I see no problems with the rule. If they don't make it, they don't make it.
Number 9 can be revised to add that voting for yourself or voting jailed or inactive. Not number 10. 10 is different.
10 requires nothing new.
13 should thus forth state that if one misses the rounds they go inactive. Should they go inactive with a good reason, such as camping against will or unable to ask a trustworthy friend, they should debate such with GM and the decision will be made from there. No hassle from any peanut gallery. The GM has the sole choice to allow the person into his/her round, not the people who like to complain other people in the game.
HirunHikari
4. TY 9. TY 10. TY 13. Thats what it says. But the GM should announce if the are letting people do that at the beginning. I don't know if we should count self-vote as a pass... maybe we could hold a general vote on that topic... yeah...
Anyhow, about 13, right now it's not so clear with its' information there, my version was intended to clean up the vagueness in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
