|
|
there is no way to do a poll on abortion because there are too many view points to consider is something so important. |
gold 1 |
|
17% |
[ 3 ] |
gold 2 |
|
29% |
[ 5 ] |
narf. |
|
52% |
[ 9 ] |
|
Total Votes : 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:22 pm
there is clearly no arguing with you. So, why don't we just forget everything I've said and let me admit you're right. Just give the babies a chance. That's all I ask and I'm sure that the babies, who are alive, know or feel or are affected by your decisions for abortion(the term your is used as in people). I am not just spouting emotional rhetoric, but to deny that there is emotion involved, you could bet your life there is. You know what, you don't have to give blood or donate your kidney. There is a perfectly possible chance that someone else will give something. But a baby inside you completely relies on you. Are you so unfeeling that you can't understand what that means? That baby has to trust you and love you. If you betray it, then it is good it didn't come into the world because it would feel it is rejected by everyone, if not even you, its creator, could give it a chance.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 4:37 pm
Walk away from the debate if you think I'm stubborn or not worth your time, but please don't 'admit' that I'm 'right' when you clearly don't agree with me. I would much rather agree to disagree.
The thing is, I've had extended debates with some very intelligent pro-lifers who have really opened my eyes. I swayed towards the pro-life side for a while because of it. Now, I believe abortion should remain legal, as bodily integrity is very important, but I'm much more interested in reducing abortion by fighting to increase the availability of contraception, the availability and quality of sex education, support for young mothers and women who don't wish to take a break in their careers for children: women who might otherwise not want to have an abortion, etc. than I am in fighting with people whose ideologies differ from mine but who, ironically, want very similar things to me (but for different reasons).
And, yes, abortion is emotional but appeal to emotion is not a valid debate tactic. It proves nothing and should convince nobody.
And finally, there isn't a perfectly possible chance that other people will give blood, donate bone marrow or give up a kidney. In the UK, 6% of the eligible population actually give blood: six people for every hundred who are perfectly able to give blood do. There is a huge shortage of blood, and giving blood is easy, quick and almost painless. Giving bone marrow or a kidney is much more complicated and it's usually the case that people who need bone marrow or new kidneys receive them from people they know or who are in their family, partially because they're more likely to have a tissue type match but also because people in the general public are not willing to help Joe Nobody. Either way, the same basic principle is the same: if you do not give blood you are probably denying someone somewhere the chance to live, yet you are not forced to give blood; why should pregnancy be any different just because you personally 'know' the 'person' involved?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:31 pm
That is because babies are those - in this case humans - that have already been born. According to Merriam-Websters Online Dictionary: Main Entry: 1ba·by Pronunciation: 'bA-bE Function: noun Inflected Form(s): plural babies Etymology: Middle English, from babe 1 a (1) : an extremely young child; especially : INFANT (2) : an extremely young animal b : the youngest of a group 2 a : one that is like a baby (as in behavior) b : something that is one's special responsibility, achievement, or interest 3 slang a : GIRL, WOMAN -- often used in address b : BOY, MAN -- often used in address 4 : PERSON, THING
Definition 1 a(1) is the most appropriate.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:46 pm
Really good prolifers call them fetuses. Well, human makes you seem less like a person. So human, since you're life is so insignificant and you being alive might not make me feel good, how about we 'let' you die.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:38 pm
Mercution Really good prolifers call them fetuses. Well, human makes you seem less like a person. So human, since you're life is so insignificant and you being alive might not make me feel good, how about we 'let' you die. its gonna happen eventually anyway.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 2:42 pm
Mercution Really good prolifers call them fetuses. Well, human makes you seem less like a person. So human, since you're life is so insignificant and you being alive might not make me feel good, how about we 'let' you die. Why? A fetus is not a human. A fetus is not a baby. The mass of cells inside the womb is not a baby, nor is it human. It is a potential human, potential baby. As such, I will again ask, why should I die? I am certainly human; I am out of the womb, I have met all the qualifictations for life, why then is it right to kill me? How does the word human make someone seem like less of a person?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:24 pm
Mercution Really good prolifers call them fetuses. Well, human makes you seem less like a person. So human, since you're life is so insignificant and you being alive might not make me feel good, how about we 'let' you die. But it still has yet to be determined whether an embryo or fetus can be considered a living thing yet.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:32 pm
chaoticpuppet My view is once it takes it's first breath, it can be considered human, as it will finally have met all the qualifications for it to be considered a living human. Though I would like to add, that my personal views on abortion do not, at all, conflict with the fact that I believe abortion should be legal (and should be legal to the point I put above). Personally, if I were given the choice, I do not think there would ever be a case where I would personally choose abortion. I would also like to add that, even with legalized abortion, I would personally hope that the percentage of abortions would be 0%. However, like I said earlier, I want the choice of whether or not I can have an abortion. I would like to bring in the topic of the usage of contraceptives, such as a condom; as well as the illogical position of those who are for the usage of contraceptives and against abortion. What I am asking is, how is it logical to be for contraceptives (which decreases the chances of getting pregnant) and be against abortion (which decreases the chances of giving life to a potential human.) i have a question, why do you choose the first breath? ScarredImage And remind me to remark on my view of contraceptives vs abortion cuz I have more opinion on that too. so what is your opinion? SyphaBelnades Your saying that the ability to feel pain should be the line? That seems pretty logical to me. I have a question, though. I'm not very familiar with the Hippocratic Oath, but is abortion allowed by it? Sorry if this is a silly question, I'm just curious. my BROTHER says the ability to feel pain should be the line. i actually think the zygote in the line. but the Hippocratic Oath actually does NOT allow abortion, but there is a different oath physicans can take that has no such restrictions. a lot of physicans take that Oath because the Hippocratic Oath appeals to the powers of Apollo and Jupiter which disagrees with people's religions. Mercution Why should babies deserve life? Why shouldn't they? Have they done something so terribly wrong to want to live when they are conceived? fetuses threaten the mother's life, as i mentioned in the first post. yes they don't mean to threaten the mother's life, and the mother might've even helped set up the circumstances to allow her life to be threatened, like someone that joins the military, but we can not deny her the right to defend her life. i agree that making lemonade of a situation is really a wonderful and heroic thing to do, but we can't start forcing people to be heroes. we can't make people risk their life for others. this is an emotional topic, but really people need to tone it down. i'm not a mod, but getting upset with someone is not going to change an opinion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 1:50 pm
Sorry if I get upset becuase I view human life or even 'potential' human life more precious than most.
By the way, the idonotregret.com probably doesn't have to many visits from I do regretters. The people I know and the people my friends know could tell you something else. They all believed in abortion before they did it or before they learned the true extent of it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 2:42 pm
I regret not keeping my baby. My ex-girlfriend is devastated too. We had no problems until after she did it. Then we both started having these dreams. This child that we'd never seen before was crying. It was the same baby in both of our dreams. We say it die in each dream on the same night as the other had it. The child was killed in all the ways that abortion is done. At the end, the child would reappear fine and tell us that it loved us anyway.
No lies, baboos, abortion is scary s**t, and I am totally against it now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:40 pm
Kalorn i have a question, why do you choose the first breath? First of all, breathing is a qualification of life. If I cannot breathe, I cannot live too long. Secondly, I breathe one way, potential babies don't breathe that way. Furthermore, there are other standards they don't meet, I merely chose breathing as it was the first one, and easiest one to explain, that popped into my head. Mercution Sorry if I get upset becuase I view human life or even 'potential' human life more precious than most. Don't worry, it's a very emotionally driven subject. Secondly, and I cannot stress this enough, I find it necessary to have the option of being able to have an abortion; however, I in no way want or find it necessary to have an abortion, and I would hope, that with the option there, no one would get one.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 5:46 pm
hmm, abortion. If it threatens someones life in anyway then yes go ahead do it. But I am against it in other cases, I mean your taking away life and your taking away thier potential to do good. If you dont want it put it up for addoption but dont kill it. What if Martin Kings mom had an abortion? The USA would be a very different place.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 7:14 pm
Chocolate Flavor Vanilla hmm, abortion. If it threatens someones life in anyway then yes go ahead do it. But I am against it in other cases, I mean your taking away life and your taking away thier potential to do good. If you dont want it put it up for addoption but dont kill it. What if Martin Kings mom had an abortion? The USA would be a very different place. What is your stance on contracecptives? They severely decrease the chance for life to even be made. What if Martin Luther Kings mom used contraceptives?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 10:13 pm
chaoticpuppet Chocolate Flavor Vanilla hmm, abortion. If it threatens someones life in anyway then yes go ahead do it. But I am against it in other cases, I mean your taking away life and your taking away thier potential to do good. If you dont want it put it up for addoption but dont kill it. What if Martin Kings mom had an abortion? The USA would be a very different place. What is your stance on contracecptives? They severely decrease the chance for life to even be made. What if Martin Luther Kings mom used contraceptives? I'm against those too, if your going to have a sex do it for a good reason. Have a kid damnit!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:32 am
What about abstinance? What if Martin Luther King's mum had abstained?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|